Reviews

41 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Pandorum (2009)
8/10
An excellent SF horror flick.
29 January 2010
Warning: Spoilers
From beginning to end, this movie grabs you by the throat and won't let go. Every time a question is answered, more come up, as the crew gradually regain memories, and the few survivors exchange what little they know.

The closest parallel I can think of is not a movie, but the classic Robert A. Heinlein story "Orphans of the Sky", written in 1941. In Heinlein's book, a group of people is sent to the stars in a "generation ship", one designed to let folk live and multiply for the several generations the journey is expected to last. Unfortunately, something goes wrong, and the current passengers have lost most of the technological knowledge needed to run the ship, which is so sophisticated that it still continues to run itself. And some of the current passengers have become mutants, deadly to "real" humans.

This vessel is a bit different, having 60,000 folk in "hypersleep", and a rotating crew of 3 to run things. But something goes wrong, and a ravenous enemy roams the corridors of today's ship, possibly mutated passengers, and the few humans who are alive have memories badly impaired by too-long a sleep. There are, of course, the obligatory buxom damsel in distress, the insane crew members, and many elements of a traditional locked-in sci-fi horror movie. However, in this movie, it is very well executed, and, as said, grips the moviegoer from beginning to end.

This is a movie I will definitely watch again, if only for Antje Traue's performance as the buxom, ass-kicking damsel in distress. Wow.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Painkiller Jane (2005 TV Movie)
5/10
Fairly decent, obvious pilot for a series.
17 December 2005
Warning: Spoilers
This is the first show I've ever seen Emmanuelle Vaugier in, and she's not half bad, as an actress, or as eye candy.

The basic plot line seems to be, she's infected by a virus when she and her Army Special Ops team stumble onto a biolab camouflaged as an illegal drug factory. This virus is usually 100% fatal, but accelerates her body's healing abilities. She finds this out when she is the only survivor of an ambush as her team tries to evacuate the lab.

Naturally, Dark Forces in government and crime want to analyze her healing abilities, and create a force of unkillable warriors. For the remainder of the flick (pilot?), she's on the run, trying to figure out who's wearing the White Hats and Black Hats. She forms an alliance with a good-looking (naturally) thief and his buddies, and eventually figures out which way is up.

It is a pleasure to see Richard Roundtree again, and part of his excellence is, he is equally convincing as both good guy and bad guy (sorry, you'll have to watch the film to see which he turns out to be). Hopefully, the TV series, if it comes, will leave out some of the sappier sister/sister interactions, one of this film's weak points.

Good escapist Saturday afternoon stuff, about what you expect from SciFi's better original flicks.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
The ominous lurker, again, again and again...boooring.
13 January 2004
Dull Demi, going thru the motions. Ditto Prochnow. Ominous portents that elicit yawns. Michael Biehn trying to be dynamic, which ain't his shtick.

To quote Buffy Summers, "If the apocalypse comes...beep me."

Going back to sleep now.
9 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Firefly (2002–2003)
Only lasted 15 episodes, and has 120 comments. Wow.
9 January 2004
From what I've read of other's comments here, you either love this show or hate it. But, for a show that was so quickly cancelled by some knucklehead suit at Fox, it has certainly inspired strong feelings.

Having seen this series on DVD, in the order that Joss Whedon intended (Fox royally messed up the continuity by their inane scheduling), I've decided - it is simply superb TV. Probably the best I've seen in a long time.

Like all Joss Whedon shows, it's based on simple storytelling, with a few mystery elements to keep you thinking. But a great cast and some excellent writing make this well worth watching.

I hope the upcoming movie will resolve a couple of mysteries:

Just who is the Shepherd, really?

Just how powerful is River Tam?

In the meantime, if you can rent, buy or steal (just kidding) the DVD set, do it. Even if you're as skeptical as I was, you might be won over. As others have said, it's the Old West in outer space, with some great twists, eg, a courtesan/call girl whose profession is so highly regarded that she makes the ragtag crew respectable by her presence. Very imaginative.
19 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Showgirls (1995)
7/10
Actually, not all that bad.
31 December 2003
After reading some of the scathing reviews here, I'm almost afraid to say I actually liked this film. It's no dumber than the Austin Powers movies, and, IMHO, a lot more intelligent than the Halloween movies. And, yes, I definitely enjoy gazing upon the unclothed female form, of which there is a gorgeous plentitude here.

Demi Moore should have taken classes from Elizabeth Berkley before making "Stripper"; I've never seen a better, or more comical, on-screen enactment of a private lap dance. Poor Kyle McL must have needed a boatload of cold showers after shooting that scene a few times.

Anyway, after checking Paul Verhoeven's list of movie credits, which tend heavily toward scifi drama, I figure he made this movie as a comic change of pace. A for effort, C- for execution!

This movie gets my ultimate compliment; I might actually rent it again. 7**/10.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Why bother? 3***/10.
19 December 2003
The producers united a superb cast, with a storyline that gave potential for a wonderfully escapist adventure flick. It starts out well, with a great attention-grabber of an opening. At that point it deteriorates into mindless, confusing drivel, too painful to detail here. My only question is, how could the director totally waste superb talents like Mr. Connery and Peta Wilson? Who wrote this cr_p, a corporate focus group? Deeply disappointed.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cold Case (2003–2010)
Excellent show.
14 December 2003
Low-key, well written and very well acted.

Kathryn Morris is a find, and the supporting cast is way above average.

Anyone who really likes CSI and Without a Trace will enjoy this gem.
47 out of 58 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tru Calling (2003–2005)
Excellent Eliza, poor writing, mediocre cast.
21 November 2003
After watching two episodes, I've decided Eliza Dushku deserves better than this. She is far and away the best part of this series.

The supporting cast is straight out of 90210, exuding California cool, and the storylines so predictable that...well, why bother watching?

Too bad, a fine actress wasted on dreck probably written by a focus group. They need a new paradigm (sorry, couldn't resist the corporate meeting cliche).
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A wonderful poem on film.
1 November 2003
Just a simple little film, wonderfully done. An Irish ballad in pictures, a skillful rendering of legend and family.

Sort of "Quiet Man" meets "Ring of Bright Water."

If the folks who butchered "Mists of Avalon" had only hired John Sayles...
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Irreversible (2002)
2/10
A total waste of time.
12 October 2003
The first 25 minutes consists of all the scenes going in circles, so that people are walking on floors, walls and ceilings in turn - why, I don't know. The director ain't no Stanley Kubrick, all it does is make folks dizzy. Between that and the dim lighting, not to mention the too-loud "background music" which sounds exactly like a beehive, the average intelligent viewer has no clue what the heck is going on.

Do we really need to watch a guy ride a stretcher in an ambulance for 2 minutes, with no dialog?

What a waste of 60 minutes of my life. I stopped watching at that point, even the delectable Monica Bellucci couldn't save this mess.
11 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
For All Time (2000 TV Movie)
9/10
Story of love and second chances - Outstanding!
5 April 2003
The folks who've commented on this movie earlier have said it all, much better than I could. Mary McDonnell leads a fine cast, with Bill Cobbs outstanding as the Conductor who offers Charlie another chance at happiness in life. This film borrows some ideas from "Needful Things", and a healthy dose from the classic Twilight Zone episode "A Stop at Willoughby", stirs, blends well and produces an evocative masterpiece.

Great movie for a date - heck, you can always watch the end again in the morning, if you get distracted.
17 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Deadly Love (1995 TV Movie)
6/10
A tragic love story, told simply and well.
7 March 2003
Quite simply, the age-old, always new story of two people who fall in love, a love that is doomed from the start.

He's a homicide detective, a man who brings killers to justice. She's a vampire, a deadly predator who must kill to live. And they fall deeply in love, as he begins to learn her true nature.

Not a chick flick per se, just an exceptionally good TV film, with a superb cast. No one does vulnerable strength better than Susan Dey.

I gave it a 7 out of 10. Decide for yourself.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Arena (I) (2001)
3/10
Lots of nudity, not much sense.
11 February 2003
From what I could see, the only reason this movie exists is to give some very beautiful Playmates multiple opportunities to display the nude female figure divine. Regretfully, the nude scenes are (for me anyway) pretty much destroyed by poor editing; the constant cuts and pseudo-artsy close-ups become very distracting after a while. Maybe they were trying to avoid letting us see the silicone <grin>?

The "actresses" can't act, even with their clothes off! Most of the characters are obviously speaking a different language overdubbed in English. As for the storyline, well, it's got so many holes in it, I wouldn't even know where to begin. Even the fights are poorly staged, their impact destroyed by dumb closeups and dizzying, confusing scene jumps.

Too bad, with a little effort, it could actually have been a fairly decent movie. The first step would have had to be, give the Playmates some acting lessons. Both vertical and horizontal.

One positive note: the scenes in which the women struggle to learn the fighting arts are actually quite well-done. You get the feeling the actresses enjoyed learning how to fight, and put themselves into it, without any phoniness.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dragnet (2003–2004)
Excellent.
3 February 2003
This show takes a cast of top-notch pros (like Lindsay Crouse and Erick Avari, just to name two) and uses their talents to the hilt.

The storytelling is taut and well-paced, the secondary characters very well-written (check out Cleo the hooker in "Silver Strangler").

In a word, I like this show.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dragon Fighter (2003 Video)
4/10
Actually, not bad for a straight-to-video flick.
6 January 2003
Warning: Spoilers
Once I ignored some of the implausibilities, this was actually a fairly decent horror/monster flick. So, I'll give some of the good points first: - the dragon was quite convincing, especially as she prowled through the tunnels looking for lunch (hint: she likes humans). - the action was fairly non stop, and, after a weak beginning, I got quite absorbed in the storyline. - sorry to say, I was kind of rooting for the dragon - she was probably the most convincing and consistent character in the movie.

Now for the implausible stuff **maybe some spoilers**: - if you were hunting a fire-breathing dragon in 1100 AD, would you charge into its cave with a barrel of gunpowder under your arm? Duh. - a female character with an all-American name, blonde hair and obvious Slavic accent, trying to pretend she's Spanish? Huh? - a lead scientist whose Slavic accent you can cut with a knife, and he's supposedly born in Chicago, educated in USA? - a military helicopter pilot who does his own repairs, flies a huge transport copter with no other crew, and is an expert marksman and combat soldier to boot? OK. Uh huh. I won't even mention his giving 3 different call signs in 2 minutes while communicating with his base.

It's still better than some of the Japanese monster flicks from the 60's, but not by much. If we're lucky, we won't see Dragon Fighter 2, though naturally the ending left that possibility wide open. Or, maybe, they'll hire a real director next time.

In spite of everything, I gave this flick a 4 out of 10. Add 2 more if they rewrite the plot, and Dean Cain gets eaten in the first ten minutes. <grin>
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
36 Hours to Die (1999 TV Movie)
7/10
A very good TV movie.
28 December 2002
I watched this flick from beginning to end, and enjoyed every minute.

Granted, there are a few implausibilities (all the killers dressed in black, with long black raincoats?), but it was easy for me to ignore the minor glitches and just kick back.

Saul Rubinek makes a very good villain, just enough over the top not to be totally implausible. And with Kim Cattrall and Carroll O'Connor adding their nickels' worth...

Enjoy.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Starts out at ***, ends up at 1/2*.
15 December 2002
A strong beginning segues clumsily into a dark and confusing middle.

  • Plot devices spring up out of thin air, with little rhyme or reason. EG, the powerful daddy, the buddy with nautical connections, ad nauseam.


  • For most of the film, the lead actors seem to swallow the majority of their lines, which are anyway spoken so low as to be unintelligible. If I hadn't had closed captioning, I wouldn't have understood half the dialogue. Is this a thing with "artsy-house" films?


  • Does Gabriel Byrne have narcolepsy here, or does he simply wish he were in a more intelligent movie?


Too bad, if it had kept up with the strong beginning, this could have been an excellent film. What a waste of talents like Robert Loggia and Bob Peck.

Summary: better than any sleeping pill.
12 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Revenge (I) (2000)
7/10
Much better than I expected.
12 November 2002
In spite of some obvious flaws, notably an over-the-top villainess (whom I still found myself rooting for), this film kept my total attention from start to finish.

Negative note: why does anyone cast Anthony Michael Hall as anything other than a corpse in a box?

The storytelling is good, the direction crisp, and Alexandra Paul is a pleasant surprise to me (sorry, I never watched Baywatch or Melrose Place - to me, Tom & Jerry cartoons had much greater entertainment value. Hey, what can I say? I'm a guy).

My recommendation: kick back, relax and enjoy. It's better-than-average entertainment, and didn't strain my aging brain cells. And Alexandra is very easy on the eyes.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
In spite of its flaws, a film that grabs your total attention.
27 October 2002
Many others have analyzed this film's flaws, and they are there. I won't enumerate them.

But, this is the first time I've seen Asia Argento on film, and, guess what? She is definitely an ACTRESS. Basically, she is this movie, and she carries it off excellently. I couldn't stop watching, as she lead through one transformation to the next, in her descent into madness. Whoa!

One quibble: the ending is weak. Someone as imaginative as Dario could definitely have done much better. But, that said, I still give this film an 8 1/2. A disturbing masterpiece.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Anna's Dream (2002 TV Movie)
8/10
Surprisingly good movie for PAX Network.
20 October 2002
There is so much going on in this movie, it would be hard to capsulize everything, so I won't even try.

Lindsay Felton does an outstanding job as the newly paralyzed Anna Morgan, and as the movie's narrator. She comes across as a real person, with hopes, fears and frustrations like everyone else. The film spends time introducing her family, and, quietly, subtly and intelligently showing us a bit about each person, in a realistic way.

Perhaps my only quibble about this movie would be, Anna is described as a champion gymnast before her injury. Having seen what sylphs most female champions are, it's hard to believe someone as abundantly endowed as Anna...OK, stopping now.

It's an excellent little slice-of-life movie, with a fairly realistic portrayal of dealing with paraplegia (eg, the constant shifting of weight in the wheelchair, to avoid pressure sores and circulation problems). Perhaps the movie's strength is, the wheelchair is only part of the story. The family is the main story.

OK, if that's not clear, just watch it for yourself. It's not syrupy or Disneyfied, just honest, gentle storytelling.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A tough movie to watch, but more than worth it.
21 September 2002
As a youngster, I collected all the Robert E. Howard stories I could find, and I have the entire Conan series in paperback, most published around 1970. The forewords in most of these books gave a brief, often shockingly inaccurate description of Howard's short, unhappy life, and his suicide at age 30. One callous editor even made the comment in the foreword about the loss to fantasy writing when `he blew his silly brains out.' (sic)

This movie, based on Novelyne Price's book, is a moving account of his relationship with the only woman he ever dated. And, while it makes it clear how much his mother controlled him, it avoids the mistake of becoming too deeply psychoanalytical. Instead, it simply tells the story, and tells it clearly. Renee Zellweger, minus blonde hair and Hollywood glamour, is a genius at conveying a complete sentence of feeling with just a look, and overcomes the fashions of the 30's to look glowingly beautiful. Vincent D'Onofrio brings Robert Howard to the screen, in all his complexity, as both a very likable and totally frustrating character.

It was hard to watch, as the relationship blossomed, and then foundered. I found myself wishing they could make it work, even when I knew it was doomed. It's neither an upbeat movie nor a three-hankie weeper; it's just life. Probably why the suits in Hollywood couldn't figure it out.

I gave it a 9. 'Nuff said.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A compelling little film, in spite of plot deficiencies.
15 September 2002
Warning: Spoilers
**This review contains some spoilers**

I'll start by saying I gave this movie a 7 out of 10, largely on the strength of Megan Gallagher's beautiful performance. This actress carries her years very well, and the fine character lines on her face only add to the depth and maturity of her portrayal here.

The film begins with P.I. Jack Fletcher and his partner getting involved in a shootout, during which a bullet fragment `grazes' Fletcher's optic nerve, leaving him blind. (Naturally, any daytime drama fan knows what will happen later on, with a `graze'). Rebecca Rose (Megan) becomes his trainer in coping with sightlessness, and is obviously immediately, intensely attracted to Fletcher.

We also meet Rebecca's sister, Bedelia (the lovely Roxana Zal), who is a total recluse since an incident of childhood incest rape. Bea (Bedelia's nickname) is totally dependent upon Beca, unable to function in the world of reality, and feels terrifyingly threatened whenever Beca gets seriously involved with a man. All of this is laid out elliptically, almost in passing, and the writers refreshingly give the viewers credit for enough intelligence to put things together for themselves.

Beca obviously has some problems of her own, as she begins to spy on Fletcher, taking advantage of his blindness to be near him, in his house, without his knowledge (or does he suspect it, perhaps; some vague hints are offered in his behavior). She is there, hidden, when a thug comes for a revenge killing, and kills the heavy with a knife to the back while he is speaking to Fletcher. (One knife stroke, in the back, through ribs and all, directly into the heart(?), and the guy croaks on the spot - uh huh). She then drags the body out of the house, and dumps it, while Fletcher is trying to figure out what's going on, from the sounds alone.

She continues to spy on Fletcher. In a well-done scene, she noisily closes the front door of his house, staying inside. Fletcher begins looking to the door, clearly sensing something, and begins moving toward her. Then he passes a vase of fresh flowers, and picks them up to sniff, looking like a man who's found an answer. The shift and play of expressions on Beca's face, from nervousness, to fear and then relief, is totally gripping, as she clearly realizes he smells her perfume.

There's also an ex-girl friend of Jack's, who still has feelings for him, and begins to expose Beca's misdeeds.

All these elements come to a head in the film's climax, which I won't reveal, except to say it's not completely obvious; there are a few surprises at the end. But, throughout, Megan Gallagher gives a compelling, gripping performance, and carries me right along with her. It's a shame she has never found her niche again, since her days with Dabney Coleman.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The TV series was much better.
1 September 2002
Warning: Spoilers
I was a huge fan of the Highlander TV series, at least in part because of the welcome leavenings of humor it gave the characters.

If the TV series, on average, got an 8 out of 10, this movie gets a 3. Not least because it totally ignores the plotlines already laid out.

Case in point: immortals do not, ever, fight or kill each other on holy ground. In the TV series, on at least one occasion, it mentions a huge disaster (the destruction of Pompey) taking place when two immortals violated this prohibition.

In this movie, however, *spoiler* a squad of immortals kills another group of immortals on holy ground. Ho hum, just another day at the slaughterhouse.

Please.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Too many implausibilities to maintain suspense.
25 August 2002
Warning: Spoilers
This review will contain some **spoilers**, but I won't give away the ending.

I'd like to start by saying IMHO, Courteney Cox is a very fine actress, and one of the saving graces of this movie. But her portrayal of a woman who has been blind since age 11 is sadly lacking; too much fumbling, and acting helpless when it is not called for, and then doing something like quickly sitting in a chair pulled out for her, without brushing her hand over it to place it. This distracts the viewer, making the plotline lose some of its punch. (Maybe my experience with a blind friend is making me too critical).

Briefly, the plot is that a killer is raping, then brutally slashing young college women to death. Our blind heroine, Emmy, is raped in her bedroom at home, then spared when her husband comes home unexpectedly. Yet later in the movie, the dastardly villain unhesitatingly stabs a security guard to death, with two other people less than 20 feet away. Not someone who would be scared away by a wimpy husband's sudden return.

In between, the writers/director manage to load in a bunch of other cliches, like the cops who leak private details about the blind witness to a brutal, uncaring press. And the defense attorney who tries to convince the jury she cooperated with her rapist. Etc. I'm not sure where this movie lost its punch, but after about 15 minutes, I totally lose belief in the blind damsel in distress. The rest of the plot is typical TV Chinese menu, one from each column. When I got tired of watching Courteney trying to act her way through this mess, I simply tried to keep the yawns to less than one a minute.

I thing it was supposed to be a pilot for a series. Thank the Lord, it never happened.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Crossing Jordan (2001–2007)
Forget the plots, and enjoy the characters.
13 August 2002
Warning: Spoilers
This is definitely a character-driven ensemble show, and you either like the characters, or you don't.

The interactions between the characters are outstandingly well-written, too numerous to mention. Just one example: the complicated, support/fight relationship between Jordan and her father, which rings so true.

My only negative comment is about some of the plotlines, which take contrivance to a new low. Just for an example, **spoiler**, a producer offers to make two assistants in the ME's office stars of their own TV show; a week later, the show is on the air. Even I know it takes a lot more than a week to start a TV show; heck, it takes a community theater group months to set up a one-act play (I speak from experience).

But it's still a damned good show, and the writers have created a believable, enjoyable group of characters. It ain't Ibsen, Thank God, but it's pretty darned good.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed