Violated (1984)
1/10
Is this supposed to be a joke?
3 July 2003
Warning: Spoilers
Well, stupid me, tracked this movie down because of John Heard. Little did I know, I was in for the hardest thing I've ever done in my life. Sit through this movie. I really hope you publish my review IMDB! Maybe it will help some people.

*Spoilers*

First of all, well, there's so many things wrong with this 'movie'.

1. In the 'rape scenes', the men have their pants on, and in no part do they unzip them.

2. NO ONE in the movie can act. No one. Maybe the little boy. But the girls are just so stupid.. you can tell they are reading their lines (which are just sadly poorly written) off the cards

3. The dialogue is just embarrassing. In one scene, the girl is naked in her room, and her brother comes in, and I won't say anymore, it's just an awkward scene. And so stupid.

4. STARING JOHN HEARD???? If staring means he's in it for TWO MINUTES towards the end, with a cap on, so you can't even really see him that much? Whatever. They just tried to sell the movie to (saps like I was) saying he starred in it because they knew they wouldn't have a movie otherwise.

5. The relationship between the woman and the cop is just creepy. That goes back to poorly written characters though. When we first meet him, he tosses a baseball up and down ANNOYINGLY.. and they develop a relationship (?) When she's supposed to be 18, and he's really unattractive and in his 40's?

6. The characters.. The cops saying "Give it up" and etc, when the girls say they were raped, that's annoying.

That's just starting off to say what's wrong with it! Don't be like me. Don't rent or buy this because you like John Heard. OR, if you want a sleazy/rape movie (If that's YOUR thing). It's not for either, it's just stupid. 1/10.
8 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed