This is NOT "unbelievable garbage", as some other critics, here, would say.
I am tired of those who would compare books to the movies made from them. For God's sake, a movie is INTERPRATIVE!!! When you read "The Nutcracker Suite", do you criticize the very beautiful ballet because EVERY WORD of the original book is not adhered to?
The PERFORMANCE given by Mr. Waterston is enough to launch this vehicle into greatness. He is simply wonderful.
You can HAVE Mary Tyler Moore. But Waterston is astonishing. And he always IS.
If people insist on criticizing films because they don't "match" the book from which they are taken, I suggest that they do NOT call themselves "film lovers".
This theory has been argued for decades, but still, people do not understand.
It is IMPOSSIBLE to put every thought, every line from a book, into a film. Please get used to this.
Thanks so much. -Studiojudio
I am tired of those who would compare books to the movies made from them. For God's sake, a movie is INTERPRATIVE!!! When you read "The Nutcracker Suite", do you criticize the very beautiful ballet because EVERY WORD of the original book is not adhered to?
The PERFORMANCE given by Mr. Waterston is enough to launch this vehicle into greatness. He is simply wonderful.
You can HAVE Mary Tyler Moore. But Waterston is astonishing. And he always IS.
If people insist on criticizing films because they don't "match" the book from which they are taken, I suggest that they do NOT call themselves "film lovers".
This theory has been argued for decades, but still, people do not understand.
It is IMPOSSIBLE to put every thought, every line from a book, into a film. Please get used to this.
Thanks so much. -Studiojudio