5/10
Weirdness for weirdness' sake
3 January 2002
I love Bill Plympton's animation. I remember going to animation festivals in the early-to-mid 80's and his short-shorts being a staple. He has an active imagination, his work shows movement at all times, and his artwork even approaches beauty in its own way.

That all being said, this is a movie that could have been. The trademark Bill Plympton weirdness is all there, and it's really all the film is about. This could have easily been a twenty-minute short, and probably should have been. The same plot actions are repeated over and over again, simply to give Plympton opportunities to be more weird. These pieces -- in themselves -- are fascinating, but it makes the entire movie crawl. There IS a plot, it's just very underdeveloped.

I'd still recommend it to Plympton fans, but anyone else will be extremely annoyed.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed