2/10
OMGs! *wretches*
5 October 2003
Warning: Spoilers
This and the third installment of this series, were directed by Chris Angel, a guy who has done absolutely nothing else in his life but 3 other unheard-of, horrid movies.

'Nuff said? Yeah. I thought so. This reeked just as bad as the third one. Okay, honestly, it was a TEENY bit better, but this really was a horrible, tedious, boring @ss movie.

Again, the stone is loose and some bubble-headed blonde has it.

'Nuff said? Yeah. I thought so again. I hadn't thought it possible, but the acting actually got WORSE! After Wishmaster 3, I thought I'd seen it all, but there's more! Rent it just to throw stuff at your TV for having to watch it. Really. The sets are a bit better, but that's the only difference between this one and the third one.

It starts out on a promising note, and then the promise is broken, almost immediately, and never once attempts to redeem itself.

Don't waste your time.

It gets a 2.1/10 from...

the Fiend :.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed