Briana Loves Jenna (2001 Video)
1/10
my negative personal view on Briana loves Jenna
14 March 2002
My opinion is very clear but not shared by many!

This film is everything but erotic and the overkill on editing made it look like an MTV video clip instead of what it should have been: a porno. The cast, including Jenna, acted totally uninspired. The sex, boring without intensity, looked staged and at times unreal. I like to watch sex that expresses something like passion but here I watched people having sex for money. This was not f***ing on the job, but f***ing as a job. There was a lack of enthusiasm I seldom witnessed in a porno and grounded in porno as I am as I have seen a few thousand films in 17 years, this really shocked me. From Jenna and her crew I expected something extraordinary beautiful but instead I watched the opposite. Most negative things about this production are the constant interruptions, caused by the numerous cuts and film-tricks and the really terrible lighting (too dim / too bright). It distracted my attention from the sex and that is something which only happens to me if the sex is not hot enough.

Or in this particular case: Mr Willy didn't move an inch!

The many experiments spoiled my appetite. What could have been a first class porno turned out to be a boring film with an unmotivated cast. This film is no masterpiece and therefore it deserves no high marks. This feature is what I would call a very cheap copy of an Andrew Blake production. Andrew Blake however knows to combine sex, art and editing, in a way Jenna, Sterling and their team have to learn.

Performing a porno is totally different from directing and editing one. Fortunately more people (also editors at major studios) shared my thoughts and therefore there must be some truth in what I write.

With the reputation of Justin Sterling, the raw video materials must have been good, there's no doubt about that but due to the artistic minds/ideas of both editors: Jenna Jameson and her finance Mr Sterling, the real attention was not paid to the sex (as it should have been) but they did focus everything on the cast and the settings.

This film is the first of a series and in my view the experiment already failed. Some people only like the movie as it shows them Jenna after having been away for two years. As a film critic I only look at the end result and not at the cast. Despite of being a fan, the film could not convince me and is in my view the third worst production she made. (Phantasm, because of the sex and Wicked Weapon as it is also shows an overkill on editing).

I voted this film with 1 for one reason only: it has absolutely nothing which excites me. As a Jenna fan (since 1993) I feel disappointed about this production and hope that the next in these series are much much better.

Some people may see this negative review as an attack but I only wrote about what I felt watching this movie: disappointment and no excitement.

Yours truly,

Spetz
17 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed