Doubtless fans of the title actor will disagree, but I couldn't find any redeeming features in this film. What starts with an interesting subject (a man given unlimited powers by God) - if we ignore the far superior "Man who could work miracles" by HG Wells, which pre-dates this trash by a hundred years - becomes an excuse for 'jokes' and the crudest humor.
But ultimately what disturbed me was that the moral seemed to be that Bruce himself was free to exercise his 'God-given' powers for his own amusement or to better his own life. Is mankind so enfeebled that it never occurs to the character - except in a token and perfunctory moment - to actually do good with his newly acquired omnipotence?
But ultimately what disturbed me was that the moral seemed to be that Bruce himself was free to exercise his 'God-given' powers for his own amusement or to better his own life. Is mankind so enfeebled that it never occurs to the character - except in a token and perfunctory moment - to actually do good with his newly acquired omnipotence?