Belly of the Beast (2003 Video)
5/10
Probably the most B.S. I've ever seen in an action movie
30 May 2005
Warning: Spoilers
"Belly of the Beast" isn't a great movie nor is also a bad film. I watched this film under the insistence of my friend because he said this movie was terrible so I had to see for myself. This turned out to be a pretty decent action flick. Seagal does okay in his umpteenth straight-to-video outing. It's seems as if Seagal is going to be the next king of straight-to-home video movies. In this film, the plot is nothing great, but the action scenes are pretty decent. The main problem with this film is that it was too unrealistic at points. ****CONTAINS SPOILERS**** For example, Steven Seagal had never ever moved that fast on screen. Especially in the scene when he jumped through the window and fell on his back. You know that was a stunt double. If Seagal had of tried that stunt himself, he would've ended up in the hospital for about 4-6 weeks. What about that crap when the guy was shooting arrows at him and he takes out a sword and slices the arrows in half as they're being shot at him. This film is not bad, it was just unrealistic at times but hey what action movie isn't? Instead of being called "Belly of the Beast" this film should've been called "Bullsh*t of the Beast" cuz it was so much of that going on in the movie.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed