5/10
Intermittently effective, but undercut by cheap production values and an unfocused screenplay
9 August 2007
Warning: Spoilers
When you first see a film like this included in a "Drive-In Movie" 50 pack, you expect it to be fairly crummy, but "Jive Turkey" (as it is titled in this collection) turned out to have some good things going for it. (BTW, I think the "Baby Needs A New Pair Of Shoes" title is a much better one for this film. It's unclear who the Jive Turkey is supposed to be - the Italian boss played by Dekova? The informer? Who?)

Some of the acting is surprisingly effective. Fortunately, this includes the lead role. Paul Harris (as the numbers king "Pasha") is the best thing about the movie and the main reason to see it. He really is a pleasure to watch, and he pretty much carries the movie. Most of the supporting actors tend to be stiff and amateurish; but even so,the director can often get a good reading of a nice zippy line of dialog out of his supporting cast when it really counts. There is even some snappy camera work in spots, and Ernie Banks chips in with a couple of nicely understated soul pieces that complement the atmosphere the film wants to generate. This happens often enough that the movie never sinks to the of camp or kitsch.

However, the screenplay and low budget production values cripple the director's attempt to generate a compelling experience. After a moderately interesting opening scene which promises a gang war between the black numbers racketeers and "Italian" gangsters, things just settle down into a meandering plod; you never really get the sense that Pasha is in any real trouble. Indeed, it's typical of the movie's problems that Pasha's enforcer 'Serene' kills the Italian bosses right hand man in that opening scene (in a contrived but reasonably compelling way), but nothing seems to come of it, and there seems to be no lasting consequence. Come to think of it, the opening credits feature a (badly staged) massacre by the Italians that also never is mentioned again.

The rest of the movie is more of the same. It's obvious that people worked their fingers to the bone to make the most out of a tiny budget; but good camera work and location scouting can't hide the fact that the movie is obviously a 70's production trying to pretend it was set in 1956. And it's a real shame that the producer and director didn't have a good story editor to help them polish their screenplay. The final showdown between Pasha and "Big Tony" doesn't make a lot of sense and doesn't really follow from anything that came before. The "surprise" revelations about 'Serene' and the identity of the informer in Pasha's organization are meant to end the film with a bang, but I saw both those plot twists coming in the first five minutes, and again, they didn't really organically connect with the rest of the plot.

Still, I thought it was worth seeing once on the strength of Paul Harris' performance and for some moments of real interest and good film-making. I'd love to see what the Ransoms could have done with a real budget and a ghost writer to help them tighten their story ideas. As a previous reviewer mentioned, a revisionist filmmaker like Quentin Tarentino could work wonders with a remake.

Not worth seeking out, but if the "Drive In Move 50 pack" falls into your possession, this movie is worth taking the time to see.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed