4/10
Too Wacky. Should Have Been A Bit More Serious.
6 March 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I have never really been one who likes Bond films. I have only seen a few of them and I should say that this one is probably one of my least favorites.

I'm going to start with the worst. The silliness of this movie sticks out like a sore thumb. I would have rated this movie a whole point higher, then I saw the chase scene that looked exactly like something straight out of "The Duke's of Hazard", complete with an outrageous car jump with a sound wacky effect. That was really bad.

I also feel like this movie tried to fit way too much into it. You have a funhouse, a car chase, a casino, a boxing match, a bayou boat chase, a karate sparing event, and a private island all serving as locations throughout this movie. That is way too many. Had they just stuck with some of those and improved the action that occurred in them, I think it would have made for a more successful plot.

For the positives, I did really like the villain in this movie. An assassin who uses a golden gun is a very good Bond enemy. Christopher Lee does a good job with that character. The rest of the characters in this movie, from Nick Nack, to Goodnight, to Bond himself, all work well.

With all the different locations, you would really not think this movie would be boring, but it did indeed bore me at times. The plot is a big problem throughout the film. Someone who really likes the Bond genre would probably like this movie more than I did. If I was to make a suggestion I would advise someone to seek out a better 007 film. I'm sure they would not have to look very long to find one.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed