Charles Dexter Ward (Vincent Price) arrives at a small village to visit the house he inherited from his ancestor (also Price) who died there 110 years ago.
The full title of this film is "Edgar Allan Poe's The Haunted Palace", which is not only incorrect and misleading to the audience, but an insult to H. P. Lovecraft, who had virtually no films made of his stories up to this point. Sure, in the 1980s and after Stuart Gordon championed Lovecraft... but hardly a peep before that!
Where else are you going to hear the words Cthulhu, Arkham, Necronomicon and more in one film? Talk about the Elder Gods? You are not, at least not in the 1960s. This film was groundbreaking, and Corman deserves a lot of credit for bringing the Charles Dexter Ward story to a bigger audience.
Vincent Price looks great in this film, perhaps better than ever. Certainly, this is among his most menacing roles, not only killing but threatening sexual assault. This was Debra Paget's final role, and she did excellently as the story's heroine. As Ivan Butler says, Corman has a "skill in finding beauty in the conventional misty landscapes, huge baroque rooms, unending stone-flagged passages" and more. AIP and Corman never failed to give us some beautiful sets and costumes.
Howard Maxford says the film "never quite shifts into first gear." I see his point, as the suspense is not strong and the movie seems to idle for quite a bit (to continue his analogy), but I think this can be overlooked by the great things this film has to offer. For example, the child called "it" is pretty great. So much potential here.
While this is not my favorite Corman-Price collaboration (that award goes to "The Raven"), this is still well worth checking out. Price never disappoints, and this has all the trappings of a decent film, both for its time and today. I am sad such films do not get made anymore, and that this one seems to be among the least known and appreciated among Corman's "Poe" series.
The full title of this film is "Edgar Allan Poe's The Haunted Palace", which is not only incorrect and misleading to the audience, but an insult to H. P. Lovecraft, who had virtually no films made of his stories up to this point. Sure, in the 1980s and after Stuart Gordon championed Lovecraft... but hardly a peep before that!
Where else are you going to hear the words Cthulhu, Arkham, Necronomicon and more in one film? Talk about the Elder Gods? You are not, at least not in the 1960s. This film was groundbreaking, and Corman deserves a lot of credit for bringing the Charles Dexter Ward story to a bigger audience.
Vincent Price looks great in this film, perhaps better than ever. Certainly, this is among his most menacing roles, not only killing but threatening sexual assault. This was Debra Paget's final role, and she did excellently as the story's heroine. As Ivan Butler says, Corman has a "skill in finding beauty in the conventional misty landscapes, huge baroque rooms, unending stone-flagged passages" and more. AIP and Corman never failed to give us some beautiful sets and costumes.
Howard Maxford says the film "never quite shifts into first gear." I see his point, as the suspense is not strong and the movie seems to idle for quite a bit (to continue his analogy), but I think this can be overlooked by the great things this film has to offer. For example, the child called "it" is pretty great. So much potential here.
While this is not my favorite Corman-Price collaboration (that award goes to "The Raven"), this is still well worth checking out. Price never disappoints, and this has all the trappings of a decent film, both for its time and today. I am sad such films do not get made anymore, and that this one seems to be among the least known and appreciated among Corman's "Poe" series.