6/10
Bad, but still notable!
28 July 2012
Granted this is not the best gay porn film made, but you have to admit it is noteworthy in that it features the great John Holmes in his only, to my knowledge gay film. For the most part, it is evident Holmes is not enthused with this project. I'm not sure why he made it. It could be money, etc. Lackluster performances aside, it does boast some raw sex scenes. While it's been said by some Holmes should not have made it, this also makes it more unique and somewhat campy. Some may want to view it for it's novelty as both a John Holmes gay flick or an example of really bad gay cinema. Most of the primary performers eventually succumbed to AIDS. That being Chris Burns, Joey Yale, etc. I'm sure a lot of gay men have fantasized about desirable straight men interacting sexually with other men, albeit with a little more exuberance. Yes, a bad film, but still worth a look.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed