To start of with I have to say I absolutely loved Susan Hills book The Woman in Black. From the theatre play to the made for British TV drama made in the 80s. Then I heard that it was remade with Daniel Radcliffe but didn't hold high hopes considering he is Harry Potter. I watched and was suitably impressed despite the little variation with the ending.
So now we come the sequel of the movie and I find myself cursing Hollywood yet again. The woman in Black is supposed to be a one off story, it works better that way. But instead the money grubbing parasites felt they should milk this for all its worth. What has been produced is nothing different from any other crap horror movie that relies on bump in the night moments to deflect it from what a poorly written story it is. There is nothing that's sets this film from other crappy made horror films. Take Blair witch project and remembers how good it was, then remember how Blair Witch 2 came and it was the worst piece of tripe over. Sadly like Bollywood, Hollywood now concentrates on quantity than quality
So now we come the sequel of the movie and I find myself cursing Hollywood yet again. The woman in Black is supposed to be a one off story, it works better that way. But instead the money grubbing parasites felt they should milk this for all its worth. What has been produced is nothing different from any other crap horror movie that relies on bump in the night moments to deflect it from what a poorly written story it is. There is nothing that's sets this film from other crappy made horror films. Take Blair witch project and remembers how good it was, then remember how Blair Witch 2 came and it was the worst piece of tripe over. Sadly like Bollywood, Hollywood now concentrates on quantity than quality