Tomie: Replay (2000)
6/10
"Tomie: Replay"- Certainly an improvement over the original with a few interesting moments and some solid direction. A mediocre film... but a fun one.
3 September 2016
Ah, "Tomie." The original film, based on a popular ongoing manga, is a strange little side-note in the world of horror. A cult- film that fascinatingly attained something of a strong following, and lead to a slew of sequels over the past decade-and-a-half.

I personally could never wrap my head around the apparent appeal of the original movie. It was a weird, contrived and often incompetent effort even for its bizarre content and presumably low-budget. Filled with nonsensical plot-points that I'd imagine only would make sense to hardcore fans of the source material, weird twists and turns you couldn't always follow and some generally lousy plotting. ...not to mention a few amusing "hiccups" in the production due to what I imagine were issues with the budget and time.

That being said, I do view this first sequel as a certain and definite improvement. With a more focused script and a more confident sense of visual direction, I think "Tomie: Replay" is actually a decent- enough bit of fun... filled with just enough trippy visuals, cheesy scares and memorable moments to keep you watching, even if you occasionally roll your eyes are some of the sillier moments.

It's a mediocre film. But a fun mediocre film.

Yumi (Sayaka Yamaguchi) is searching for her father- the director of a hospital who mysteriously vanished after a shocking surgery where what appeared to be a woman's severed head was removed from the abdomen of a young girl. However, as her investigation into her father's vanishing continues, soon it becomes apparent that something is very wrong at the hospital... and it may have something to do with a mythical and monstrous entity known as "Tomie" (Mai Hōshō)- a demonic force who is able to regenerate bodily damage and drive men to insanity with their lust for her.

The biggest benefits to this production that give it an edge are the focused and concise script by Satoru Tamaki and some genuinely strong visual direction courtesy Tomijiro Mitsuishi. Tamaki quickly establishes a good sense of mood, location and dynamic in his writing, and you very easily understand what's happening, no matter how crazy the proceedings may get. While it does often fall back on horror clichés and it does run off the rails here and there, at very least there's a coherent central narrative and focus, which I felt the first film lacked at times. Though I'd be lying if I didn't have some issues with a few key sequences. (I have never really been able to buy how quickly Tomie drives men mad, for instance. It's always a bit too abrupt in the films I've seen, though admittedly I have not seen all of the films.)

Tomijiro Mitsuishi helms the film, and I actually really enjoyed his work here. He's got a very keen of composition and movement, and many of his shots slither along like dreadful serpents, building tension before the strike. I was particularly taken with how he portrays the hospital, and how foreboding and alienating he is able to make such a common building in the film. It's a true shame that this seems to be his only credited directorial effort, at least from what I can tell. He's got a talented eye, fondly reminding me of early Carpenter or Craven, and I'd like to see him do some more work.

The performances are also quite strong, the cinematography is leaps and bounds beyond the original, and general production is very solid.

That being said, I do have some big issues with the film, mainly in that it never quite is able to build a satisfying sense of terror or drama and because at times it does feel like it's holding back or even just unsure of what to do with some of the ideas that are raised. I don't want to spoil anything, but the film does promise some interesting ideas in it's later half, but it never quite gets built upon in a satisfactory manner. Combined with a general lack of fear (the film seems more content with being "weird" than "scary"), and I do have to dock some major points.

Still, I can't help but really appreciate this film as a huge improvement over the original. It may not quite be a "good" film, but it's solid and enjoyable.

I give it a slightly-above average 6 out of 10. It's a good time and you could do far worse. Just don't go in with high expectations.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed