My review focus is less on the acting and more on technical details. Just watched 3/30/17. Spoiler alert....! Details about plot to follow.... When the forensic spouse lifted a fingerprint from her husband's wine glass and ran it in the system, she discovered a match already in the system that revealed his true identity and criminal past. Later they say due to her running this fingerprint, they arrest her husband because NOW they have a partial match to the fingerprint on a piece of evidence. However they had run the partial fingerprint earlier and had no matches. HELLO, if he was in the system already as a criminal, his fingerprint would have come up the first time they ran it and it would have nothing to do with her running his fingerprint from the glass. After all, that fingerprint she entered matched the one in the system tied to his past criminal history.
Other details were missed like if you suspected your husband was a serial killer and you dumped his stuff and found a storage locker key, you would not leave the dumped contents on the bed for him to discover you had found it and tip him off.
It was not believable that the detective who lost his wife would not remember his wife had ropes tied on her hands in four strands in the exact same manner as the recent killings, especially when the Forensics partner kept saying it reminded her of another crime scene. And he certainly would not argue a point like that being her imagination when you know as a detective it would be branded into his memory that was how he found his wife.
Other details were missed like if you suspected your husband was a serial killer and you dumped his stuff and found a storage locker key, you would not leave the dumped contents on the bed for him to discover you had found it and tip him off.
It was not believable that the detective who lost his wife would not remember his wife had ropes tied on her hands in four strands in the exact same manner as the recent killings, especially when the Forensics partner kept saying it reminded her of another crime scene. And he certainly would not argue a point like that being her imagination when you know as a detective it would be branded into his memory that was how he found his wife.