5/10
I was surprised by one detail.
22 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
What detail surprised me? Normally this type of films, they usually take more along the racist road, but this time no, this time the film is not going around, white against black, if not all drifting towards a plea against the death penalty. The funny thing is that on all sides we see that this is requested, except for the defense lawyer.

The truth is that it is not a bad movie, but it does not become a great movie, more than anything because I do not believe many of the things. The lawyer and the lawyer should not have passed the casting. She has neither strength nor anything and there are moments when I focus more on other aspects of her face than on her performance. The defendant is very content, but can lead not to believe it very easy.

The films of trials are usually boring and must be done very well. This is not the case. Moments of judgment are not the best taken. I do not really like photography. When you try to put the light through the windows, the photograph is horrible. He does not know how to do it. The moments on the street look more like a movie for television than anything else.

The management is not great either. It does not get boring, but it's very close. It is very repetitive. He does not know how to do anything but close-ups.

You will see it and well you have not wasted the time, but almost
2 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed