Successful Motion but Fragmented
9 November 2017
With "Newark Athlete" of 1891, the experimentation with the Kinetograph improves. Having already come to the success of good picture quality with "Dickson Greeting" and the Duncan trilogy the same year, Edison was now finally able to test motion abilities. In the previously mentioned "Dickson Greeting" the movement made by the hat which motion pictures pioneer William Kennedy Dickson passes from one hand to the next is slow and smoothly done; here, a different type of motion is tested. The movement of the Indian clubs that the young athlete swings is quick-moving and different from that of the previous test, and, like before, it is successful in achieving its goal.

Oddly enough, it is not known who the athlete of the title is. Even without his name, I find it already pretty strange that Edison would go to the trouble of hiring a athlete from Newark (if that's really were he came from) to come down and perform the camera test. He could just as easily have gotten one of his factory workers to mimic the role (as he did with "Men Boxing") but no. Additionally, like the other camera tests from 1890-1891, it's possible none of them originally had titles and were merely given labels for the sake of the Kino DVD set (hence the '[' at the beginning and end of the titles on the menus). How then were they able to identify this young man as being from Newark?

Lastly, I would like to point one more thing out. The Edison set disk has a different camera test from the ones available online. The test available on disk is very short, damaged and only shows a very small movement from the athlete. The library of congress film available online is a different story and features an entire swing from the clubs (and also has darker lighting than the other). I guess it is possible two tests of the same subject were taken, thus creating two different film fragments to be projected.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed