Review of The Burmese Harp

The war theme was quite popular during the post-war period in different kinds of arts, especially film production. Therefore, we can observe lots of films, which were under strict censorship of governments, about the particular battles, persons or big events with a purpose to agitate a patriotism and undermine the reputation of the ex-enemy. Therefore, on the background of these films, Kon Ichikawa tried to shoot a film about the war, without single propaganda for or against anyone. Instead, he "filled" the film with the abstract thoughts about life, which are tightly connected with Buddhism, during the war and, literally, lots of songs and hymns. That is why you could get it as Japanese musical about war with some deep meaning. Due to the shooting date, I cannot properly assess the picture and sound quality: the main thing - you see and hear something. However, there is no doubt about the cast. The play of every soldier of Captain Inouye's group was felt as a representation of real soldiers of WWII because you could see individual thoughts and feelings towards particular events around them. Moreover, Rentaro Mukini, who had a starring role, showed the exemplary model of commander, who cares about the people's lives more than heroic actions with the clear death of the whole troop. Still, Mr. Yasui, who played the central personage of the whole film - Mizushima, made a great effort to persuade the audience that there could be a sudden enlightenment and decision to stay at Burma, despite that you have a chance to go back home. Sudden decision to become a monk. Certainly, the director was inspired by Zen Buddhism, especially the Rinzai school and its idea of gradual enlightenment. According to broad claim, this film was as recognized Buddhistic, due to the several signs as the speech of the monk "Burma is Buddha's country". But, I could not agree with it. The presence of temples and monks adds certain level spirituality and, in this case, serves as vital bond in the screenplay for more dramatic upshot rather than a sacred message to the audience. To sum up, the audience of this film is certainly sufficiently narrow. If you want to be in this group, you must have: 1) certain interest in the World War II history; 2) desire to watch the 2-hour-long black-and-white grainy film; 3) patience toward simple and obvious plot. At the end of watching, you can surely say that you watched worthy Buddhistic film from respected Japanese director.