Sadly this is a very very remote view of the lives of these people. Else everything else is manicured well in advance for the arrival of the cameras.
Also, in my mind it was some connection with "The Witness Wore Red". Yet, the participants make clear that the marriages are voluntary.
Finally, the documentary itself is very very slow. But it gives hope that a low qualifications male with many wives and even more children can lead such lives, so remote from the camps of Syrian refugees or the poverty of the remote Indian villages. Life can be so good in America. Yet, the state is omnipresent. From welfare to employment, most employment there.
So a thought unintended by the film makers who seem to be very favorable to this small community: why do the American tax payers have to pay for these people even if they disagree with this type of family?
Also, in my mind it was some connection with "The Witness Wore Red". Yet, the participants make clear that the marriages are voluntary.
Finally, the documentary itself is very very slow. But it gives hope that a low qualifications male with many wives and even more children can lead such lives, so remote from the camps of Syrian refugees or the poverty of the remote Indian villages. Life can be so good in America. Yet, the state is omnipresent. From welfare to employment, most employment there.
So a thought unintended by the film makers who seem to be very favorable to this small community: why do the American tax payers have to pay for these people even if they disagree with this type of family?