The genre of women-in-prison movies has never been my favourite type of exploitation movie. You know the deal: young woman goes to a prison (usually in a jungle somewhere in Asia or South America), she was probably framed and is innocent, there are tough lesbians in the prison and the warden punishes the inmates with devices and techniques inspired by sadomasochism.
Oh, and I forgot the main reason anyone watches these: shower scenes. What would a WIP movie be without one of those? That's right: basically pointless. You watch for nudity, and maybe the kinkier among you watch for the bondage situations the warden inflicts on the inmates. And it all culminates in an escape attempt.
"The Big Doll House" could be described as notable for two unimpressive reasons: it's an early example of this particular subgenre, which would go into overdrive in the '70s, and it's actually quite toned down by contrast to the rest of them.
For one thing, there's no full frontal nudity. Some of the actresses in the shower scene are clearly not even naked - you can see glimpses of underwear. The filmmakers apparently didn't have the neat idea of elevating the camera, or just angling it up, so you can't tell they're not really naked.
There's not really much to say about "The Big Doll House" other than that; the rest applies to all other WIP flicks as well. In this one, the warden is a lesbian, so we don't really get that from the other inmates, nor are they depicted as being all that vicious, apart from one scene at the very beginning where the protagonist has her hair dunked in a toilet bowl. The movie kind of forgets that right after it happens, and they all band together. It does that a few other times, though I have already forgotten the specifics: it has what feels like an episodic story-structure, but I'm not sure if it's supposed to. A lot of events seem isolated because they have no effect on the narrative; another example that just occurred to me is a mudfight between Pam Grier and some other girl.
The movie is also pretty badly acted. The actresses all seem dazed, as though they'd been hypnotised. The only stand-out is, yes, Grier, in what I think was her first speaking role. Some of her lines are delivered pretty badly too, but she just has a presence, inflected with power and intelligence. The actresses who play the other inmates are all completely forgettable.
There is, of course, also Grier's perennial counterpart Sid Haig, playing his usual sleazoid role. Those two were good together; the other performers, and the script they're performing, is just so pedestrian that it gets in the way.
Oh, and I forgot the main reason anyone watches these: shower scenes. What would a WIP movie be without one of those? That's right: basically pointless. You watch for nudity, and maybe the kinkier among you watch for the bondage situations the warden inflicts on the inmates. And it all culminates in an escape attempt.
"The Big Doll House" could be described as notable for two unimpressive reasons: it's an early example of this particular subgenre, which would go into overdrive in the '70s, and it's actually quite toned down by contrast to the rest of them.
For one thing, there's no full frontal nudity. Some of the actresses in the shower scene are clearly not even naked - you can see glimpses of underwear. The filmmakers apparently didn't have the neat idea of elevating the camera, or just angling it up, so you can't tell they're not really naked.
There's not really much to say about "The Big Doll House" other than that; the rest applies to all other WIP flicks as well. In this one, the warden is a lesbian, so we don't really get that from the other inmates, nor are they depicted as being all that vicious, apart from one scene at the very beginning where the protagonist has her hair dunked in a toilet bowl. The movie kind of forgets that right after it happens, and they all band together. It does that a few other times, though I have already forgotten the specifics: it has what feels like an episodic story-structure, but I'm not sure if it's supposed to. A lot of events seem isolated because they have no effect on the narrative; another example that just occurred to me is a mudfight between Pam Grier and some other girl.
The movie is also pretty badly acted. The actresses all seem dazed, as though they'd been hypnotised. The only stand-out is, yes, Grier, in what I think was her first speaking role. Some of her lines are delivered pretty badly too, but she just has a presence, inflected with power and intelligence. The actresses who play the other inmates are all completely forgettable.
There is, of course, also Grier's perennial counterpart Sid Haig, playing his usual sleazoid role. Those two were good together; the other performers, and the script they're performing, is just so pedestrian that it gets in the way.