1/10
So unprofessionally made. A new low.
14 May 2019
Warning: Spoilers
This must be the least professionally made documentary I've ever seen. Let's start with the acting in the reaction shots of the interviewer. Her "oh, really?" reactions are worse than Mark Wahlberg's famous "What? No!" from "The Happening".

And her voice-overs even when it's not part of an interview. They are so incredibly distractingly bad, with inappropriate pauses in the middle of sentences. Really? That's the best take? Really? You could not just re-record that voiceover?

And in every interview she's wearing a completely different outfit. No, hear me out. She has such a different clothing, jewellery, hair, and make-up that it's distracting because it makes you wonder "who is... is that the same interviewer?" when you should be thinking of the contents of the interview.

There's so much more to say about this documentary. For some magic reason it goes on a detour to talk about The Pill, for no reason that's relevant what-so-ever.

But this is just scratching the surface of what nonsense is in this thing. Logical conclusions are not followed. E.g. the argument women have more sex drive, they're just more picky. That's one completely contradictory sentence, since as sex drive goes up by definition pickiness would be pushed to the side.

But really the proof that this is the worst documentary ever made is when the interviewer actively makes her interviewee uncomfortable AND they chose to leave that in. Why would you do that to yourself? Why would you make them visibly uncomfortable? When you edit this movie WHY WHY WHY would you leave that in?!

Oh, also she pronounces "women" as "woman" half the movie.

This is the "The Room" of documentaries.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed