Another installment of 'A Ghost Story for Christmas' and an ultra low budget, low production scale, low production values adaptation of a lesser short ghost story from M.R. James.
I think that the intention was to use a plainly small budget and minor production to tell a smaller story in an understated, reductive manner in an effort to create an effective drama from very short measures.
Regrettably I found this adaptation to be the least engaging of all the BBC's "direct" versions of M.R. Jame's tales, both from either the original 70's run and the intermittent 21st century series; discounting the ill judged 2010 version of 'Whistle and I'll come to you' as a far looser and unfettered effort; albeit one with redeeming features.
The scenes were not at all convincingly written or directed, with basic background as well as foreground inadequacies.
The antagonist was ably acted in most scenes but everyone else seemed to be under-directed or overacting or playing their part very broadly.
I found the ghostly elements to be weaker than I could sustain faith in....particularly the appearance of the phantom itself.
The best part in terms of my enjoyment was the one well crafted and well performed scene whereby the murderer and murdered first meet and strike up and 'relationship'. I liked that little set up.
I didn't like the framing/narration device of a modern perspective provided by a contemporary character. It seemed to me to be less believable than a failed effort at a period one would have been. Although it probably has the grain of a good idea behind it: something of a reflection of M.R. Jame's own way of telling his ghost stories in a contemporaneous manner at the time that he first told them to his select audiences, I couldn't ever get engaged with the idea here.
Overall personally I can commend the effort but not the product which simply left me bored and disbelieving for far too much of its run time.
In this instance, of such a under-nourishing story, casting a black actor in a key witness role made me think of how much more interesting a brief story would of been about his character in 1680's England rather than what was actually being offered and I actually preferred to mull this effect in my mind than be engaged by the creative vision offered here.
The morale of my tale is: if you are making a limited little story don't add something far more striking and distracting and interesting than your actual story as a minor cogg in the wheel of your narrative.
3 out of 10 from me
I think that the intention was to use a plainly small budget and minor production to tell a smaller story in an understated, reductive manner in an effort to create an effective drama from very short measures.
Regrettably I found this adaptation to be the least engaging of all the BBC's "direct" versions of M.R. Jame's tales, both from either the original 70's run and the intermittent 21st century series; discounting the ill judged 2010 version of 'Whistle and I'll come to you' as a far looser and unfettered effort; albeit one with redeeming features.
The scenes were not at all convincingly written or directed, with basic background as well as foreground inadequacies.
The antagonist was ably acted in most scenes but everyone else seemed to be under-directed or overacting or playing their part very broadly.
I found the ghostly elements to be weaker than I could sustain faith in....particularly the appearance of the phantom itself.
The best part in terms of my enjoyment was the one well crafted and well performed scene whereby the murderer and murdered first meet and strike up and 'relationship'. I liked that little set up.
I didn't like the framing/narration device of a modern perspective provided by a contemporary character. It seemed to me to be less believable than a failed effort at a period one would have been. Although it probably has the grain of a good idea behind it: something of a reflection of M.R. Jame's own way of telling his ghost stories in a contemporaneous manner at the time that he first told them to his select audiences, I couldn't ever get engaged with the idea here.
Overall personally I can commend the effort but not the product which simply left me bored and disbelieving for far too much of its run time.
In this instance, of such a under-nourishing story, casting a black actor in a key witness role made me think of how much more interesting a brief story would of been about his character in 1680's England rather than what was actually being offered and I actually preferred to mull this effect in my mind than be engaged by the creative vision offered here.
The morale of my tale is: if you are making a limited little story don't add something far more striking and distracting and interesting than your actual story as a minor cogg in the wheel of your narrative.
3 out of 10 from me