The story isn't uninteresting, but I would have loved to have been there to press the publisher. She was convicted of offshoring profits rather than paying them out. She NEVER even comes within a light-year of actually addressing this conviction (and she lost the appeal) but is whining about her life has been destroyed by this little old lady, so she sets out to ruin HER in revenge. What I wanted to know was "So, publisher, you DID in fact rip this woman off for millions in profits, right? So why would I trust ANYTHING you do or say?" Also, a birth certificate and school certificate indicate SOMEONE went to school there and was named a certain thing. It is NOT proof that Misha is this same person. There is no way at this remove to prove or disprove that based on a birth cert and school records. As for the different names in different editions of the books ... did Misha do the translating? No, the publishing companies do that. So why is the criminal publisher claiming this was something Misha did? Did Misha rewrite her book in different languages? Who does that? No one does - the publisher does. So ... they may both be liars, but the narrative is FULL of infuriating holes and huge leaps to conclusions not supported by the evidence.
Review of Misha and the Wolves
