I watched it because Freeman and Hackman were both in it. They did not disappoint. I didn't like the interrogation too much because I kept thinking why would a predominate attorney allow himself to be questioned like that. Certainly a real attorney would know his rights against self incrimination. It was the twist at the very end that re-framed the whole film and took it into a totally different direction I was not expecting. Then it made sense why Hackman allowed himself to be interrogated. Funny how the last few minutes of the film changed my opinion about the film and made me like it.
Review of Under Suspicion
