Historical drama. It just so happened that this historical series ran past me at the time, but then I was not up to it, but I remotely heard pretty good reviews about it, and since I have a patriotic theme now, then why not watch this creation of the second channel? And all these eight episodes passed me in one breath, and so I decided to leave my review about him. And here is my brief opinion - The Great wife of a Great husband. There were both pros and cons in the series, and I want to dwell on them in more detail, so I finish with the introductory part.
So, the pros: Russian Russian filmmakers and TV series makers very rarely cover the fifteenth century of our history, namely the reign of Ivan the Third Vasilyevich, who was nicknamed the Great for his deeds, because he remained in the shadow of his grandson Ivan the Fourth, who continued his grandfather's work and was able to strengthen the Russian kingdom and rid the country of the hated Kazan raids, strengthened the army and he did many more things, but it was his grandfather who started it - Ivan the Third the Great, who in turn did a lot of glorious deeds, but about whom very little is said, written, filmed, well, at least this series was made.
2. The script - the series tells the story of Sofia (before Zoya's marriage) Palaiologos is the niece of the last Byzantine emperor, who lost her home and family, but it was this young princess who, having arrived in distant Muscovy, became a Russian princess and the support of her great husband in all her endeavors, because Russia still had to unite, throw off the Mongol yoke, conquer rebellious cities and principalities, and fight with a mighty western neighbor - Russian Russian Grand Duchy, arrange children and provide a dynasty, while intrigues constantly flare up, and enemies will interfere at every step, and the brave and resolute Sofia will be a reliable support for Ivan Vasilyevich, she will love Muscovy and everything Russian, and her ancestral coat of arms - the double-headed eagle - will become the coat of arms of the Grand Duchy of Moscow and then the Russian Kingdom, and now he is one of the symbols of our great state. Almost all the characters of the series are real historical figures, information about which has been preserved in quite detailed. And almost all repeat the characters of their historical prototypes. Although, I was a little deceitful, because Ivan Vasilyevich is the second main character here, along with Sofia. Each episode ends in such a way that you definitely want to know the sequel. Of course, the scenario is not perfect, but it will pull on a solid four because of its twisting and dynamism.
3. Costumes and scenery - the series was filmed in Italy (and it is visible and even felt) and in Russia, in particular in Moscow and Pskov (again) Kremlins, Novgorod and, of course, pavilions where authentic scenery of the fifteenth century was recreated. I have climbed the Pskov Kremlin and memorized every corner there (even the Pokrovskaya Tower was filmed for some episodes). The creators managed to plunge the viewer into that era, and even me, who in the Pskov episodes tried hard to pretend that it was not Pskov but Moscow. And the costumes are generally beyond praise, because they are magnificent and look like the things of the aristocracy on the aristocrats, the chain mail on the warriors look like chain mail, and the shirts of the poor look like the shirts of the poor. My respects to the costumers, because they really did their best (except for some points, which are discussed below).
4. Acting - the old Soviet school (Boris Nevzorov, Nadezhda Markina, Pyotr Zaichenko) - my respects! But even the young (Sofia Nikitchuk, Ilya Ilyinykh, Miriam Sekhon, etc.) generally cope well with the assigned roles, the majority. And I already thought that the acting school in Russia was dead, but it's not! They can surprise you!
So, the cons: 1. Historical mistakes - Ivan Vasilyevich tore up the khan's charter (basma), and the ambassadors did not have any paizi, as shown in the series. Why do the khan of the Great Horde and his closest military leaders wear rags? After all, this is to know, and the khan is from the Genghisid clan, and no one has canceled the hierarchy, no one really knows about the fate of the brave voivode Fyodor Davydovich the Lame, and of course collective images of people who were given out for real. One question - Why? I'm talking about the Metropolitan of Moscow and the Pope of Rome. There are still a lot of these mistakes, and if we list them all, then this review will turn out to be very long, and we don't need it. Well, at least it pleases that they are baptized with a double cross, and not with a triple cross.
Russian Russians did not actually show the unification of Russia with Moscow at the head (especially the confrontation with Tver), a serious conflict with the Grand Duchy of Lithuania (it was a continuation of the unification of Russian lands), namely two Russo-Lithuanian wars (1487-1494 and 1500-1503, respectively), the struggle with the Kazan Khanate, the development of the Kama region, and of course the famous Sudebnik of 1497. Sofia's story was shown almost completely, but her husband's merits were not very much, because they stopped only at the most important (from the point of view of the screenwriters) events. Personally, I would not mind sixteen episodes if they would fully reveal the identity and deeds of Ivan Vasilyevich.
3. Speech - and again we are about it. Well, we didn't talk at that time as well as now, well, there was no such thing, even if you crack. The same problem was in the "Squad", but here it cuts the ear more strongly, because "Squad" is an action movie, and "Sofia" is a historical drama, where the emphasis is on conversations and occasionally battles and important historical events. Only a few actors are trying to squeeze out some semblance of an Old Russian reprimand, but that's it.
4. The unsuccessful selection of actors - Amadou Mamadakov in the role of Akhmat - is such a bad choice that it remains to beat your head against the wall. Amadou is more of a comedic actor (cult TV series "Soldiers" this confirms), and here he looked very comical when he uttered the pathetic phrases of the ruler of a large state. Boris Tokarev in the role of Aristotle Fioravanti looked too pale, but his historical prototype was the smartest man of that time, a great engineer and gunsmith.
5. A sharp finale - the finale catches the viewer extremely unexpectedly, just in one second everything stops - and the credits (although it turned out very emotionally). And they will not tell us about the fate of the main characters, and this is at least unfair to the viewer.
A little about the main characters: 1. Ivan the Third Vasilyevich the Great, performed by Evgeny Tsyganov, is the Grand Duke of Moscow, the collector of Russian lands, who ended the Horde rule in Russia and so on. A great husband of a great country, who got a smart wife to be proud of. I didn't think that the namesake of the Gypsies would please me, and he showed strength, and pride, and anger, humility, pain, joy. Only one minus - well, he doesn't have a royal bearing! Everything is there, but the posture spoils the overall impression.
2. Sofia (before her marriage Zoya) Fominichna Palaiologos, performed by Maria Andreeva, is the niece of the last Byzantine emperor, who unwittingly turned out to be the wife of the Grand Duke of Moscow, and turned Moscow into the "Third Rome" with him, sincerely fell in love with the Orthodox faith, introduced several useful Byzantine customs, advocated attracting foreign specialists to serve Ivan Vasilyevich and in the moments of disgrace, she remained faithful to her husband and the prince, which showed genuine Christian humility and wisdom. It's not for nothing that they say that a great woman builds behind every great man. Sofia is one of those women. She sets an excellent example of wisdom and generosity, foresight and Christianity, reasonableness and modesty. And the actress played this role very well.
The series covered many events of those years (for example, the famous "Heresy of the Jews", the conflict of Ivan with his younger brothers, and so on), and for fans of the history of Russia it will be clearly useful, as well as for ordinary people completely unfamiliar with this era. A solid four, although we could have made a five, but we have what we have.
As a result, we get a good historical series about a great woman, with a good script, interesting characters, a lot of significant events in the history of Russia, good music and good acting.
My rating is 8 out of 10 and my recommendation for viewing!
So, the pros: Russian Russian filmmakers and TV series makers very rarely cover the fifteenth century of our history, namely the reign of Ivan the Third Vasilyevich, who was nicknamed the Great for his deeds, because he remained in the shadow of his grandson Ivan the Fourth, who continued his grandfather's work and was able to strengthen the Russian kingdom and rid the country of the hated Kazan raids, strengthened the army and he did many more things, but it was his grandfather who started it - Ivan the Third the Great, who in turn did a lot of glorious deeds, but about whom very little is said, written, filmed, well, at least this series was made.
2. The script - the series tells the story of Sofia (before Zoya's marriage) Palaiologos is the niece of the last Byzantine emperor, who lost her home and family, but it was this young princess who, having arrived in distant Muscovy, became a Russian princess and the support of her great husband in all her endeavors, because Russia still had to unite, throw off the Mongol yoke, conquer rebellious cities and principalities, and fight with a mighty western neighbor - Russian Russian Grand Duchy, arrange children and provide a dynasty, while intrigues constantly flare up, and enemies will interfere at every step, and the brave and resolute Sofia will be a reliable support for Ivan Vasilyevich, she will love Muscovy and everything Russian, and her ancestral coat of arms - the double-headed eagle - will become the coat of arms of the Grand Duchy of Moscow and then the Russian Kingdom, and now he is one of the symbols of our great state. Almost all the characters of the series are real historical figures, information about which has been preserved in quite detailed. And almost all repeat the characters of their historical prototypes. Although, I was a little deceitful, because Ivan Vasilyevich is the second main character here, along with Sofia. Each episode ends in such a way that you definitely want to know the sequel. Of course, the scenario is not perfect, but it will pull on a solid four because of its twisting and dynamism.
3. Costumes and scenery - the series was filmed in Italy (and it is visible and even felt) and in Russia, in particular in Moscow and Pskov (again) Kremlins, Novgorod and, of course, pavilions where authentic scenery of the fifteenth century was recreated. I have climbed the Pskov Kremlin and memorized every corner there (even the Pokrovskaya Tower was filmed for some episodes). The creators managed to plunge the viewer into that era, and even me, who in the Pskov episodes tried hard to pretend that it was not Pskov but Moscow. And the costumes are generally beyond praise, because they are magnificent and look like the things of the aristocracy on the aristocrats, the chain mail on the warriors look like chain mail, and the shirts of the poor look like the shirts of the poor. My respects to the costumers, because they really did their best (except for some points, which are discussed below).
4. Acting - the old Soviet school (Boris Nevzorov, Nadezhda Markina, Pyotr Zaichenko) - my respects! But even the young (Sofia Nikitchuk, Ilya Ilyinykh, Miriam Sekhon, etc.) generally cope well with the assigned roles, the majority. And I already thought that the acting school in Russia was dead, but it's not! They can surprise you!
So, the cons: 1. Historical mistakes - Ivan Vasilyevich tore up the khan's charter (basma), and the ambassadors did not have any paizi, as shown in the series. Why do the khan of the Great Horde and his closest military leaders wear rags? After all, this is to know, and the khan is from the Genghisid clan, and no one has canceled the hierarchy, no one really knows about the fate of the brave voivode Fyodor Davydovich the Lame, and of course collective images of people who were given out for real. One question - Why? I'm talking about the Metropolitan of Moscow and the Pope of Rome. There are still a lot of these mistakes, and if we list them all, then this review will turn out to be very long, and we don't need it. Well, at least it pleases that they are baptized with a double cross, and not with a triple cross.
Russian Russians did not actually show the unification of Russia with Moscow at the head (especially the confrontation with Tver), a serious conflict with the Grand Duchy of Lithuania (it was a continuation of the unification of Russian lands), namely two Russo-Lithuanian wars (1487-1494 and 1500-1503, respectively), the struggle with the Kazan Khanate, the development of the Kama region, and of course the famous Sudebnik of 1497. Sofia's story was shown almost completely, but her husband's merits were not very much, because they stopped only at the most important (from the point of view of the screenwriters) events. Personally, I would not mind sixteen episodes if they would fully reveal the identity and deeds of Ivan Vasilyevich.
3. Speech - and again we are about it. Well, we didn't talk at that time as well as now, well, there was no such thing, even if you crack. The same problem was in the "Squad", but here it cuts the ear more strongly, because "Squad" is an action movie, and "Sofia" is a historical drama, where the emphasis is on conversations and occasionally battles and important historical events. Only a few actors are trying to squeeze out some semblance of an Old Russian reprimand, but that's it.
4. The unsuccessful selection of actors - Amadou Mamadakov in the role of Akhmat - is such a bad choice that it remains to beat your head against the wall. Amadou is more of a comedic actor (cult TV series "Soldiers" this confirms), and here he looked very comical when he uttered the pathetic phrases of the ruler of a large state. Boris Tokarev in the role of Aristotle Fioravanti looked too pale, but his historical prototype was the smartest man of that time, a great engineer and gunsmith.
5. A sharp finale - the finale catches the viewer extremely unexpectedly, just in one second everything stops - and the credits (although it turned out very emotionally). And they will not tell us about the fate of the main characters, and this is at least unfair to the viewer.
A little about the main characters: 1. Ivan the Third Vasilyevich the Great, performed by Evgeny Tsyganov, is the Grand Duke of Moscow, the collector of Russian lands, who ended the Horde rule in Russia and so on. A great husband of a great country, who got a smart wife to be proud of. I didn't think that the namesake of the Gypsies would please me, and he showed strength, and pride, and anger, humility, pain, joy. Only one minus - well, he doesn't have a royal bearing! Everything is there, but the posture spoils the overall impression.
2. Sofia (before her marriage Zoya) Fominichna Palaiologos, performed by Maria Andreeva, is the niece of the last Byzantine emperor, who unwittingly turned out to be the wife of the Grand Duke of Moscow, and turned Moscow into the "Third Rome" with him, sincerely fell in love with the Orthodox faith, introduced several useful Byzantine customs, advocated attracting foreign specialists to serve Ivan Vasilyevich and in the moments of disgrace, she remained faithful to her husband and the prince, which showed genuine Christian humility and wisdom. It's not for nothing that they say that a great woman builds behind every great man. Sofia is one of those women. She sets an excellent example of wisdom and generosity, foresight and Christianity, reasonableness and modesty. And the actress played this role very well.
The series covered many events of those years (for example, the famous "Heresy of the Jews", the conflict of Ivan with his younger brothers, and so on), and for fans of the history of Russia it will be clearly useful, as well as for ordinary people completely unfamiliar with this era. A solid four, although we could have made a five, but we have what we have.
As a result, we get a good historical series about a great woman, with a good script, interesting characters, a lot of significant events in the history of Russia, good music and good acting.
My rating is 8 out of 10 and my recommendation for viewing!