Golden Years (I) (2016)
7/10
Solidly enjoyable, with a fine cast
17 July 2022
Distinctly recalling the American film 'Going in style' that was released a few weeks prior in 2017, this bears strong similarities in its plot and themes. If anything, 'Golden years' is even more dour in broaching the horrid abuse and neglect of the elderly specifically, and the absurd, cruel inhumanity of society under the first of capitalism and arbitrary financial "markets" generally. Add on top reflection on the necessity of community, and the ceaseless, torrid, thankless demands required of workers. This film treads the same waters of comedy-drama, to be sure, though it's worth noting that the comedy is a tad more understated and sparse, while the stark, somber drama is played up more heavily. At the same time that it's a great delight to watch senior citizens putting pep in their step and spitting in the faces of genuinely villainous institutions, the sad and infuriating realities underlying the scenario somewhat restrain the entertainment to be had. Let's be honest, though - all this is just part and parcel of the story, and makes the movie all the more engaging.

In fact, I'd even go so far as to say that the greater contrast between the competing elements of the picture only serve to heighten each. Where 'Golden years' aims for humor, it's an especial joy to watch Bernard Hill, Virginia McKenna, Simon Callow, and their aged co-stars lean into the playful frivolity - a far cry from the more serious roles we've seen them in, and all the better on account of their advanced years. Factor in the pleasure of seeing Alun Armstrong in so prominent a part as Sid, at 70, and the bluster that Brad Moore happily adopts as smarmy, thoroughly unlikable detective Stringer, and the cast become the heart and soul of the feature. In the more sober moments, meanwhile, the players get a fair chance to exhibit the able skills we all know they possess. Though of course, a strong ensemble counts for little if the film otherwise can't stand on its legs otherwise - yet even for the disparity between the comedy and drama, this is very well balanced and rather capably written. The characters and dialogue are real and believable, and the scene writing that builds the title bit by bit is wonderfully varied as it propels the narrative.

With that said, if there's any slight deficiency to be found in 'Golden years,' it's perhaps in the story being told. Don't get me wrong, overall it's solid, and enjoyable. The swings in tone are sometimes a bit much, however, and while the fundamental weave of the tale is suitable, neither the comedy nor the drama are ever so robustly grabbing as to firmly command our attention. More substantively, though there's plentiful wit and intelligence sprinkled throughout, including at the climax - the climax itself is at once a smidgen inelegant in how it's executed, and like the denouement, too neat and clean in hurriedly wrapping up the story. One derives a certain smug satisfaction in how the plot plays out, but that doesn't entirely mean the storytelling is unimpeachable. By no means is this to say that it's bad at any point, but there's just nothing here to mark 'Golden years' as a "must-see" recommendation.

Whatever perceived shortcomings may present, however, ultimately the movie is just what it wants to be. It's steadily entertaining, with just enough sincere drama as counterbalance, and the all too real, dire themes at the core are ripe for cinema. When all is said and done the cast may be the most noteworthy facet, so fans of Hill, McKenna, or the others are likely to get the most out of the viewing experience. Even for the casual general audience, though, 'Golden years' is sufficient fun that it's worth checking out if you happen upon it.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed