Is it the writing team? The producers? An undisclosed source of financing for the production? Who was it that had connections to M. A. D. D., or an association of driver's ed instructors, to shape the film? The premise is plain enough, and promising, but of whatever else the concept may be, I wasn't anticipating a public service announcement being adapted into a thriller. All this is to say that 'The gladiator' is more than a little heavy-handed in broaching the issues of driving safety and drunk driving; of course these matters are very important, but one doesn't expect such emphatic, unwieldy treatment in a full-length feature, least of all one made by Abel Ferrara. Then again, this was a TV movie, and further proves it with use of music (score or soundtrack) that's a tad kitschy, curt editing (for commercial breaks), and major forthrightness in many regards. None of this inherently reflects on the quality of the picture, but if one isn't prepared to engage with such fare then it's best to not even stop to take a look.
Ferrara is a filmmaker I generally trust; not all his films are equal, but he can broadly be relied upon for solid entertainment. Whatever it was about this project to influence its course, there's no getting around the ungainly inelegance that characterizes a lot of the proceedings. The acting, above all, is often rather blunt, and lacking of tact or nuance. Though technically capable, Ferrara's direction in this case also comes off as a little forced and contrived, so many scenes struggle to feel authentic. Factor in the music that's enjoyable in and of itself but increasingly feels over the top as it's employed, and dialogue and scene writing that's undeniably ham-handed and overdone (including but absolutely not limited to the romantic element), and the viewing experience is surely walking on thin ice. Make no mistake, the stunts are fantastic, and the effects are well done; there are earnest (if relatively minor) thrills to be had from the core substance of the narrative, and it's cathartic to see some rotten people get just desserts. Such value is necessarily weighed against those aspects that raise a skeptical eyebrow, and these are possibly greater in number.
What's arguably most surprising about 'The gladiator' is that beyond the central conceit, the feature also tries to give thoughtful rumination on vigilantism, its worth and its folly. This facet is very welcome, and in fact I'd have liked it if the screenplay dealt with it more. There are two problems, though. First is that when this tack is broached most directly, it's with an exactness relative to other scenes and dialogue that's too on the nose for its own good. Second, with a runtime of just over ninety minutes, I don't think there's enough context of the protagonist's activities to most meaningfully give weight to the meatier topic, and as it stands such pondering is given such minimal, passing treatment that it comes off as a little gauche. And here's one more thing: the climax is surely the single best part of the picture, if imperfect. Yet at large the last fifteen minutes or so feel rushed, and overfull, as though there was a last-minute recognition of how much plot still had to be resolved but the production had definitive limits on how much time it had to do so.
More so than not I think 'The gladiator' is well made, with honest intent and fine craftsmanship, not least from crew behind the scenes. It's a curious mixed bag, however, in almost every way, and in some such regards unquestionably leaves a bad taste in one's mouth. If the writing were handled more delicately and mindfully, that alone would have improved the end result by leaps and bounds, to say nothing of more sincere choices for the music, and more careful editing and direction. Ultimately I don't think this is bad, but nor is it anything that demands viewership. If you happen to come across it it's a decent way to spend 94 minutes, though one must be prepared for the less than ideal treatment of most everything herein, and even at that I wonder if I'm being too generous in my assessment. Probably recommendable for diehard fans of Ferrara or others involved, 'The gladiator' is a modestly satisfying good time, but if you're going to watch, just know what you're getting into and temper your expectations.
Ferrara is a filmmaker I generally trust; not all his films are equal, but he can broadly be relied upon for solid entertainment. Whatever it was about this project to influence its course, there's no getting around the ungainly inelegance that characterizes a lot of the proceedings. The acting, above all, is often rather blunt, and lacking of tact or nuance. Though technically capable, Ferrara's direction in this case also comes off as a little forced and contrived, so many scenes struggle to feel authentic. Factor in the music that's enjoyable in and of itself but increasingly feels over the top as it's employed, and dialogue and scene writing that's undeniably ham-handed and overdone (including but absolutely not limited to the romantic element), and the viewing experience is surely walking on thin ice. Make no mistake, the stunts are fantastic, and the effects are well done; there are earnest (if relatively minor) thrills to be had from the core substance of the narrative, and it's cathartic to see some rotten people get just desserts. Such value is necessarily weighed against those aspects that raise a skeptical eyebrow, and these are possibly greater in number.
What's arguably most surprising about 'The gladiator' is that beyond the central conceit, the feature also tries to give thoughtful rumination on vigilantism, its worth and its folly. This facet is very welcome, and in fact I'd have liked it if the screenplay dealt with it more. There are two problems, though. First is that when this tack is broached most directly, it's with an exactness relative to other scenes and dialogue that's too on the nose for its own good. Second, with a runtime of just over ninety minutes, I don't think there's enough context of the protagonist's activities to most meaningfully give weight to the meatier topic, and as it stands such pondering is given such minimal, passing treatment that it comes off as a little gauche. And here's one more thing: the climax is surely the single best part of the picture, if imperfect. Yet at large the last fifteen minutes or so feel rushed, and overfull, as though there was a last-minute recognition of how much plot still had to be resolved but the production had definitive limits on how much time it had to do so.
More so than not I think 'The gladiator' is well made, with honest intent and fine craftsmanship, not least from crew behind the scenes. It's a curious mixed bag, however, in almost every way, and in some such regards unquestionably leaves a bad taste in one's mouth. If the writing were handled more delicately and mindfully, that alone would have improved the end result by leaps and bounds, to say nothing of more sincere choices for the music, and more careful editing and direction. Ultimately I don't think this is bad, but nor is it anything that demands viewership. If you happen to come across it it's a decent way to spend 94 minutes, though one must be prepared for the less than ideal treatment of most everything herein, and even at that I wonder if I'm being too generous in my assessment. Probably recommendable for diehard fans of Ferrara or others involved, 'The gladiator' is a modestly satisfying good time, but if you're going to watch, just know what you're getting into and temper your expectations.