I can't really describe much more about this film. It's annoying and just a combination of a bunch of basic editing tricks. The vast majority of techniques, transitions, and ideas used in the film were used in early movies or even early movies that were well known.
I should note that I REALLY wanted to like this movie, but at the end of the day it feels more like a demo reel of little projects and gimmicks that a couple of art students made and not a fully realized film. I don't think this really counts as a movie in any real sense of the term or concept. For instance, Man with a Movie Camera at least has a general overarching idea and concept going throughout the film and says something mildly meaningful about what a camera's role in society is and how the lens is used to capture the growth of culture.
However, this movie is just a bunch of brats being bratty in loosely connected skits. What value or interest is there in that?
I should note that I REALLY wanted to like this movie, but at the end of the day it feels more like a demo reel of little projects and gimmicks that a couple of art students made and not a fully realized film. I don't think this really counts as a movie in any real sense of the term or concept. For instance, Man with a Movie Camera at least has a general overarching idea and concept going throughout the film and says something mildly meaningful about what a camera's role in society is and how the lens is used to capture the growth of culture.
However, this movie is just a bunch of brats being bratty in loosely connected skits. What value or interest is there in that?