2/10
Confusing ending
19 September 2023
Warning: Spoilers
The overall movie is good as explained in all the earlier reviews. But what happens in the end? The man is shown sitting in a chair. Why? What happened to him?

Did she take revenge on the repentant?

If yes, what happened to the others on the panel who did not regret their action?

The person who feels guilty is punished and those who felt they did the right thing are not punished, at least not so severely. Right?

Is your feeling of revenge satisfied after only one member, from the group of perpetrators, meets a violent end? Or do you go to hunt down the others as well?

The Supreme Court gives its opinion only after the additional information comes in. Anybody could have done that. Even those whom we consider as defaulters. Even we. This is not a solution to any problem. What if a third piece of information comes in later on?

Even after the Supreme Court gives its opinion, no change is made to the system.

They say the events happened according to God's will. They do not say which event occurred against His will. (If everything occurred according to His will then why bring it into discussion?)

The movie leaves many questions unanswered. The ending is very confusing.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed