From the start, my decision to see Foe was only for actors. And , at the end, grace to image, acting , some good scenes and obvious noble intentions of director, , I was more than content about it.
The story... . The story is the familiar one - in night, the stranger with a proposition changing the life of a couple. But the house, the beautiful work of Saoirse Ronan and Paul Mescal , the slow rhytm and the poetry of image were only things I expected them. And this makes for me Foe as a beautiful film - maybe perfect option after a tough work day-. The twists - one confuse and childish, the other predictable but confirmed by the last scenes, are the weak parts of film. Like few couples tries of Aaron Pierce to make his character realistic.
In short, just I liked. The story is only a pretext , obvious. And, indeed, the film seems made only for fans of actors or cinematographic poems. But, it is enough. So, just beautiful.
The story... . The story is the familiar one - in night, the stranger with a proposition changing the life of a couple. But the house, the beautiful work of Saoirse Ronan and Paul Mescal , the slow rhytm and the poetry of image were only things I expected them. And this makes for me Foe as a beautiful film - maybe perfect option after a tough work day-. The twists - one confuse and childish, the other predictable but confirmed by the last scenes, are the weak parts of film. Like few couples tries of Aaron Pierce to make his character realistic.
In short, just I liked. The story is only a pretext , obvious. And, indeed, the film seems made only for fans of actors or cinematographic poems. But, it is enough. So, just beautiful.