Isle of Fury (1936) Poster

(1936)

User Reviews

Review this title
20 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Bogie tangles with an octopus.
gullwing5920034 May 2005
Warning: Spoilers
An interesting south seas island adventure & romance with a young Humphrey Bogart in a uncharacteristic early leading role as a fugitive on the run but now living an honest & reformed life as a romantic adventurer. The movie has a rather good plot with some twists & surprises, a young handsome detective sent to get Bogart is suspected of being a fugitive & we discover later that Bogart is the real fugitive instead. Bogart is very convincing & authoritative & even romantic in his role, a foreshadow of things to come. He even sports a mustache. This film bears a slight resemblance to "Red Dust", it has all the earmarks of a Clark Gable vehicle. The only weak aspect of the film is the ridiculous & laughable scene where Bogart gets attacked by an octopus while diving during a pearl hunting expedition. Bogart later denied ever making this movie, but the evidence is there & has survived. The scene would've had much more stronger impact if Bogart got attacked by a shark instead of an octopus. This movie will appeal to die hard Bogart fans as well as to film buffs of B movies & obscure, forgotten movies. For only 60 minutes running time it's worth a viewing if you can find it. Good Luck!!!!!
21 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"If a man wants to hide himself from the world, isn't this an ideal place?"
classicsoncall26 June 2005
Warning: Spoilers
With a quick "I Do" and a hasty good bye kiss, Val Stevens (Humphrey Bogart) takes off to save a handful of sailors caught in a furious tropical storm off the island of Tankana, the "Isle of Fury" of the title. With a look that asks "Did I do the right thing?", wife Lucille (Margaret Lindsay) questions her circumstances even more following the rescue of Eric Blake (Donald Woods), a handsome man who begins to fall for Lucille as the film progresses. In a desperate attempt to keep his pearl diving business alive and pay off their island home, Val is blind to his new wife's insecurity, and even encourages Eric to spend time with Lucille as he recuperates.

The moral conscience of the film is provided by Doc Hardy (E.E. Clive), a friend of the Stevens', who inserts sage advice at appropriate times, even recounting at one point the Biblical story of David and Bathsheba. It was David who sent Bathsheba's warrior husband off to war to be killed, so he could take up with the widow.

In the film's back story, Tankana's nearby island natives are refusing to dive for Val, following the disappearance of two villagers in the waters off the island. To prove there is nothing to fear, Val himself dons diving gear and heads for open water as the watchful natives stare in anticipation.

Pay attention as Val and Eric prepare to head off to the natives' island. As Eric greets Val with "Good morning, Skipper", Val responds to Eric with a hearty "Good morning Val". Neither actor batted an eye, nor apparently did the director, as the scene remained in the film.

Val's deep sea dive turns unintentionally funny as just behind him and unseen, a rather awkward looking octopus is revealed to be the cause of the natives' fears. Going hand to tentacle in unarmed combat, Val is a sure goner when his lifeline and oxygen supply both rip free of the fishing boat. Eric proves heroic, diving into the deep to defeat the beast and save Val from certain death.

In a gesture of generosity, Val offers Eric a 50/50 partnership in the diving business to remain behind, but heeding the good Doc's advice, Eric knows he must return to civilization. After all, Eric is the law, and Val was his fugitive quarry, on the run from authorities following the death of a man, though it's not clearly established whether Val was actually guilty or not. What matters is that Eric doesn't think so, having seen Val act with honor and integrity on Tankana.

Though still early in his career, Humphrey Bogart had appeared in about a dozen films by the time "Isle of Fury" was released. Following his career progress through the early films, one recognizes a more and more confident actor, though this film suffers from awkward editing at times. That's no less a recommendation though, do see it if you can find a copy of this unreleased Warner Brothers adventure, or stay attentive to classic movie cable listings.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Cheesy AND fun
samhill52156 December 2009
This quickie from Warners packs a lot in its short one-hour running time. Just about everything is thrown in, love, betrayal, greed, jealousy, danger, monsters, etc. etc. I could go on and on! And then there's Bogart with a mustache of all things. He doesn't look too comfortable in it and his performance is a bit wooden and even amateurish but who cares. Margaret Lindsey manages to look positively child-like despite that husky voice of hers. If you get the chance look for her in "Please Don't Eat the Daisies" in a worthy cameo as a prima dona. In my humble opinion she was a most underrated actor. E.E. Clive is reliable as the wise doctor. Donald Woods is probably the weakest link here but again, who cares. There's so much going on the performances are almost irrelevant. There's even underwater photography and a cheesy octopus. This is great escapist fun and well worth seeing.
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bogart's Worst Film
drednm22 July 2005
This laughable 60-minute stinker offers pre-star Humphrey Bogart as a South Seas pearl merchant married to Margaret Lindsay. There might have been a decent story here, but it's been hacked to pieces. During the wedding there's a shipwreck, and washed ashore are a sneaky captain (Paul Graetz) and strange passenger (Donald Woods). Hilarious scene with the louvred door... The storm howls outside, but the slatted door keeps out all the wind, rain, and noise! Anyway, Woods and Lindsay seem to hit it off right away while Bogart is blithely unaware. Storyline includes striking pearl divers because of the "devil fish" and thieving natives. E.E. Clive is droll as the preacher, and Gordon Hart plays the weird grandfather. Bogart battles an ugly moustache and possibly the worst-looking octopus in film history. The acting is terrible across the board, with Gratez and Hart coming off worst. Lindsay and Woods are boring, and Bogart is just plain miscast. The plot twist at the end does little to save this one.
17 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
For Bogart Completionists
chasreg1142 April 2016
Warning: Spoilers
This is not Bogart's worst film-that honor is reserved for Swing Your Lady-but Isle of Fury is a serious contender. In a perfect world, this would have starred Gable for Bogart; Mary Astor/Jean Harlow for Lindsay; anonymous WB pretty-boy in the Donald Woods role.

Thoughts/Remarks/Observations:

* The octopus here makes the octopus in Bride of the Monster seem like it came from a Spielberg epic.

* Bogart does many, many things well-but sporting a pencil-thin mustache and/or a pith helmet are not among them.

*E.E. Clive was either very adept at playing drunks, or actually was drunk for most of the film.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Bogie vs the octopus
guswhovian6 September 2020
Businessman Val Stevens (Humphrey Bogart) is recently married to Lucille (Margaret Lindsay) when he rescues Eric Blake (Donald Woods) and Captain Deever (Paul Graetz) from drowning. Eric sons falls in love with Lucille, but Eric may not be what he seems.

Isle of Fury is a pretty stereotypical Somerset Maugham plot coupled with a stereotypical South Seas island romance. None of the actors are very good, with the possible exception of E.E. Clive as a Bible-quoting doctor and Paul Graetz as the blackmailing ship's captain.

A mustached Bogie gives probably the worst performance of his career as Stevens, and the romance between is Donald Woods and Margaret Lindsay is silly, as the two have no chemistry whatsoever.

However, the highlight of this otherwise totally forgettable film is the sequence where Bogie battles an octopus - it has to be seen to be believed.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Remake Of The Narrow Corner
bkoganbing30 September 2008
Isle of Fury which starred Humphrey Bogart, Margaret Lindsay and Donald Woods is a remake of a previous Warner Brothers feature, The Narrow Corner based on a novel by the same name by W. Somerset Maugham. The original film came out in 1933 and starred Ralph Bellamy, Patricia Ellis, and Douglas Fairbanks, Jr. in the roles played by Bogart, Lindsay and Woods respectively.

Knowing how things operated at Warner Brothers and also having seen both the original and remake they did of The Dawn Patrol, I'm willing to wager half the next month's rent that whole chunks of the film, all the action sequences are just carried over from the original film. That's just how Jack Warner did things over at his studio.

I'm also willing to bet knowing the original source is Somerset Maugham who also wrote that racy epic Rain baed in the South Seas that the original since it was before the Code was a great deal spicier. The new version is 9 minutes longer and probably the spice has been removed.

Warner Brothers never got anywhere near the South Seas, probably the film was shot in Catalina. The plot concerns Bogart and Lindsay who are being married as the film opens when news of a foundering sailing ship off their island and hung up on a reef brings a call for rescue. Only two get rescued, the captain Paul Graetz, and a mysterious passenger Donald Woods.

Bogart and Woods hit it off and become friends and Lindsay and Woods hit it off even better. Both Bogart and Woods however have something in their respective pasts.

The part that Bogey plays is something he might have done later on with bigger budgets. This film was done on the cheap, the special effects are crude by today's standards. Today of course the movie going public would demand location shooting in some place like Fiji or Samoa.

It's B picture from Bryan Foy's B picture unit at Warner Brothers so take it for what it's worth.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Just take it at face value
vincentlynch-moonoi2 April 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I just watched this a second time, and I'm going to upgrade my rating a bit.

I am trying to keep in mind that the year was 1936. I can believe that Bogart once denied he ever made this film. Hardly the highlight of his career, but on the other hand, it was a B picture and the first time he got star billing.

I admit that the scene where the octopus is attacking Bogie (yes, really) is pretty fake looking...but maybe not so bad considering the year involved.

I will admit that with a little better writing and a little better cinematography, this film could have been pretty decent. A man with a less than stellar past is on the lam in the South Seas where he has turned over a new leaf (that's Bogart). At the beginning of the flick, he is getting married to Margaret Lindsay. In a storm (some good footage here), a ship wrecks on the reef, and a young man is saved (Donald Woods). That young man is secretly there to arrest Bogart, but he becomes his friend and falls in love with his wife.

Bogart is "okay" here. Except for an awful moustache! Margaret Lindsay probably did the best acting in the film. Although Donald Woods was not too bad. E. E. Clive was perhaps getting too old. Paul Graetz as the captain...how did he ever get in pictures?

The reason to watch this film is to see the birth of a career, at least in terms of star billing, even if it is a B picture.

Just don't go into it with high expectation. Accept it for a what it is. And have a little fun.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
If you've ever wanted to see a truly bad film starring Bogart...
AlsExGal26 October 2012
...this is your film. I'm giving it four stars just based on the fact that the three leads - Humphrey Bogart, Margaret Lindsay, and Donald Woods managed to carry this thing as well as they did. The film opens on a wedding between Val Stevens (Humphrey Bogart) and Lucille Gordon (Margaret Lindsay), with Lucille having all the enthusiasm of someone who is using her life savings as a down payment on buying a house that she just doesn't like. The way WB has Bogart made up will make you realize why she feels that way if you don't just laugh out loud - bad perm AND bad mustache with bad perm. Donald Woods is the mysterious handsome stranger that shipwrecks on Val and Lucille's tropical island and almost interrupts the ceremony. When Woods' character regains consciousness after being rescued, he instantly begins giving reluctant bride Lucille bedroom eyes. If you think you know where this thing is headed from the beginning you'd probably be right, so I'm going to stop right there and let you watch and find out what happens. Just don't nod off and miss the hilarious scene of Bogart wrestling with a fake octopus that looks like it is right out of Ed Wood's Bride of the Monster.

I've seen Bogart in some odd films given his later film persona - the rather experimental "Midnight" and the early talkie "Bad Sister" - but this is the only truly bad film in which I've seen him, and by bad I mean dull and predictable.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Were going to be here until the boat comes in!
sol12183 December 2009
Warning: Spoilers
**SPOILERS** Base on the W. Somerset Maugham novel "Narrow Corner" the 1936 movie "Isle of Fury" has to do with a mixed up love triangle between Tantana island's pearl salesman Val Stevens, Humphrey Bogart, his newly wed wife Lucille, Margaret Lindsey, and the mystery man of the film Eric Blake, Donald Woods.

It's Eric who showed up at Tantana unexpectedly when the ship he was on was grounded on the island in a violent Pacific typhoon. With Eric as well as the ship's Captain Deever, Paul Graetz, saved by the valiant and fearless Val he soon was captivated by Val's new bride Lucille whom he hopelessly fell madly in love with. Val for his part never suspected any hanky panky going on between Eric and Lucille even going so far as offering Eric a job on the island that would keep him and Lucille close together when he went out, on his boat, on pearl diving expeditions. What Val also didn't suspect is exactly why Eric was on Tankana in the first place! This had to do with something that he did back in the states that he's been running from the last two years!

Humphrey Bogart, as the valiant Val Stevens, looking trim and fit as well as salty, from diving for pearls and fighting a giant octopus, tries to start a new life for himself on the South Pacifc island of Tankana but his somewhat dark & shady past keeps him from doing that. It's later in the film that we find out that Capt. Deever had some idea of what his passenger Eric Woods was really after in going to that out of the way island in the Pacific and it wasn't for it's sunshine and coconuts.

***SPOILERS*** Deever trying to stir up trouble, in order to make whatever his his plans were much easier, between Val & Eric plants this false and vicious rumor that Eric was sleeping with Val's old lady Lucille. Val whom Eric had earlier saved from being killed by the killer octopus now goes to confront, and kill, both Eric and Lucille for what they were doing behind his back! It's then that the psychotic and kill crazy Val is talked out of doing what he planned to do by Doc Hardy, E.E Clive, who knew the truth behind Val's flight from justice back in the US. Doc also knew that Eric had come to the same conclusion to what he did about Val being the Innocent victim or pasty in the murder of Richard Lord: whoever he was!

The one thing standing in the way of Val's freedom from a life sentence or execution by the state was the greedy and money hungry Capt. Deever who had shown earlier, in trying to rip off Eric's billfold, what a low down skunk he was. Luckily for everyone in the movie, except Capt. Deever, old man Chris Anderson, Gordon Hart, who was hiding in the bushes, and drinking his spiced gin & tonic, just happened to show up unannounced at the scene. Coming up on him from behind Chris put Deever's sinister plan, together with himself, in turning Val over to the police, for a hefty reward, on ice!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Not very good...
hemisphere65-121 February 2021
They must have filmed half of the script and just called it a wrap. Poor writing and acting abound, and the mustache is worse than the octopus! Skip this one unless you really love Bogart.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Fantastic Film!!
HawksRevenge2 December 2009
This film aired today on TCM and the transfer looks great. Bogart, Lindsay and E.E Clive perform in a high seas adventure with Bogart as a pearl merchant. Lots to look at here with a short running time. This was one of warner's pictures of the week with a great cast, director, and cinematographer Fantastic Film (**** Out Of *****)

Look for many warner extras here in bit roles. I am surprised that there are as many low rated "Whiners" how they thought this film was terrible, but a true Bogie fan would never call any of his films bad. There is no reason for trashing any of his films, but if I did I would consider all his films great except his non Warner's films that must have been independent productions...
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Bogie in conventional-leading-man mode
marcslope25 July 2022
Humphrey Bogart, exposing a lot of midriff and riddled with a silly mustache, is a conventional good guy in this Warners quickie, never a comfortable place for him to be. (This was around the same time he made "The Petrified Forest," cementing his usual snarling-bad-guy persona.) He's OK, and so are leads Margaret Lindsay and Donald Woods, in a cheap-looking riff on an old Somerset Maugham story. They're all on a tiny South Seas island, where Bogie, newly wed to Lindsay, runs a pearl diving operation that's threatened when the natives refuse to dive, citing an unknown underwater danger. That turns out to be an octopus, one that looks like it's from a Roger Corman '50s special. Meantime, Lindsay is conflicted over her allegiance to Bogie, whom she married out of obligation and respect, and Woods, who generates more heat. There's no neat way to resolve that conflict, and the movie just kind of ends. Meantime we have casual racism, studio-bound sets clashing with what's probably stock location footage, a philosophical, Bible-quoting doctor (E. E. Clive), and a satisfying plot twist near the end involving why everybody's on that little island. It's not exactly good, and the director. Frank McDonald, was one of Warners' lesser directorial lights, but it's fast and uneven and entertaining.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Not bad but certainly not very good either due to its extreme predictability.
planktonrules10 January 2010
This is a remake of "The Narrow Corner" and I have seen several variations on the film (such as "Tiger Shark" and "Danger Lights"). So, from the onset I found the material very familiar and very predictable. In fact, beginning at the very first scenes featuring the wedding and the shipwreck, I already knew exactly what would be happening later in the movie! The only unusual thing about this B-movie was seeing Humphrey Bogart as the poor husband--and with a very cheesy fake mustache. Why he was given such an uninteresting and thankless role is simply because he was not yet a star. By 1936, he'd been in quite a few films but almost exclusively in bit parts and walk-ons. Though he'd been in Hollywood for about five years, he really hadn't yet made a name for himself.

As I said before, the film starts with a wedding on a tiny island in the Pacific. When a boat crashes in the reef, in comes a more handsome and interesting man (Donald Woods) and the new wife is captivated. However, the husband is a sap and he doesn't realize how serious this is and befriends Woods--to his regret.

Overall, this is a very simple B-movie with little (other than the novelty of seeing Bogart in a crappy film) to positively distinguish it. And, on the negative side, there is a silly rubber octopus that just needs to be seen to believed. Not horrible but certainly not very good either.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fair Drama with Nice Cast
Michael_Elliott7 January 2010
Isle of Fury (1936)

** (out of 4)

A rather bland love triangle set in the South Seas as Val (Humphrey Bogart) and Lucille (Margaret Lindsay) are married during a rough storm and minutes later there's a boat crash and Eric (Donald Woods) washes ashore. Soon all three become friends but Lucille begins to have extra feelings Eric as she starts to realize that she'll never fulfill her dreams on this island. This here is a remake of the 1932 film THE NARROW CORNER, a film I haven't seen so I can't compare the two. With that out of the way, this film here makes for some slight entertainment but in the end pretty much everyone can skip it unless you're fans of the cast. The biggest problem is, once again, the screenplay which was clearly not given too much attention, which I guess can be understood since this was meant to be the second film on a double bill. The screenplay never really knows what it wants to do because one moment we're on an adventure and then the next we're tied up in a love triangle that never really seems to work either because more attention is spent on Bogart and Woods instead of Woods and Lindsay. The film is certainly confused in what it wants to do but like many "B" movies it's at least smart enough to throw everything in and just hope something sticks. This film throws in a real crazy sequence where Bogart dives down to get some pearls and is attacked by a large octopus and soon enough Woods is underwater fighting it as well. I'm not sure what it is but no matter what movie you're watching it's always a plus when a killer octopus shows up. As far as the performances go I wasn't too thrilled with Lindsay who seemed to be sleepwalking throughout the film but I did enjoy Bogart and Woods. I thought these two actors really kept the film moving as they had a nice chemistry together and you have to love Bogie's mustache. The ending is pretty weak but the film only runs 62-minutes and makes for a decent time killer, although only fans of the stars should really seek it out.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A famous American Vice-President once said . . .
oscaralbert15 December 2018
Warning: Spoilers
. . . "What this country needs is a good five cent flick in which 'Bogart' wrestles an octopus." Always willing to do its patriotic duty, Warner Bros. soon released ISLE OF FURY, in which "Humphrey" does just that. This always eponymous film studio also takes advantage of FURY to warn American men that "Once she's seen Hawaii, she'll yearn for Paris, France." Fickle "Lucille," the bride of Bogart's "Valentine" here, hits upon any dude washing ashore, hoping such beachcombing will get her to a Mainland. (It's like Eve telling Adam, "Gardens might be nice for SOME ladies, but they give me the hives.") The sole reason that Val makes Lucy his missus in the first place is because she's literally the ONLY chick on the whole island. (If you're skeptical, just check the cast list for ISLE OF FURY.) Initially, Lucy is similarly limited (unless she wants to commit incest or miscegenation). However, Val soon learns that the fun goes out of shooting fish in a barrel when another barrel hits the beach. Warner warns viewers NOT to count their fish before they hatch, unless they don't mind sleeping with the octopi.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Boring and Predictable
utgard142 March 2014
One of Humphrey Bogart's worst movies. Bogie plays a man hiding out on a tiny Pacific island. He also sports a silly mustache. Don't feel too bad for him, though. He's married to beautiful Margaret Lindsay. Stranger Donald Woods shows up in a storm and immediately falls for Lindsay. Bogie, playing the stupidest husband ever, is the last person to figure it out. It's a poor movie that seems interminably slow for an hour. Bogart fans will want to see it for his mustache and to see him wrestle an octopus like a boss. But ultimately it's a boring, predictable endeavor that is a remake of an earlier film I haven't seen.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Bogart tangles with a bad script and an octopus...
Doylenf2 December 2009
Despite looking very much like a B-film and a rush job by Warner Bros. to produce an early Bogart film, ISLE OF FURY has enough intriguing elements in the story to make it worth watching if you're a Bogart fan. Even then, had enough presence to be worthy of better projects than this.

It's filmed on a small budget with a number of fake island sets except for a few outdoor scenes but gets off to a good start with a storm at sea and the introduction of a few strange characters. One of them is DONALD WOODS, rescued by Bogart's men from a storm when his boat is torn apart.

Woods takes an instant shine to Bogart's new wife (MARGARET LINDSAY) with just a suggestion that the relationship between Bogart and Woods hints at something in their past that neither wants to talk about. The romantic angle is handled awkwardly in the script and not played with much intensity by the trio involved.

The plot thickens and various incidents lead to a conclusion with but one surprising twist. Overall, the feeling is that the ending is more than a little abrupt without enough explanation about the characters or their motivations.

Strictly a surface telling of a story based on some original work by Somerset Maugham. None of the supporting roles are particularly well handled.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A future star shows why he became a star.
mark.waltz1 June 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Somerset Maugham's "The Narrow Corner" haf its second film version at Warner Brothers within a span of three years. This time, it has been reduced to a B film, cut down to an hour's length yet every bit as exciting and even faster paced than the original. It tells the story of diving boss Humphrey Bogart on a lost island in the Pacific, newly married to Margaret Lindsay and too busy to have a real marriage. When they rescue Donald Woods during a storm, the last thing that Bogart expects as his wife to fall in love with Woods. The squid later stolen bye Ed Wood for "Bride of the Monster" makes an appearance in the film, or at least I think it's the same squid, causing fear in the minds of the natives who refused to dive, causing Bogart to make the dive himself. of course as boggart becomes wise to what's going on with his wife, his attitude changes, making him as dangerous as Duke Mantee in "The Petrified Forest".

While the film is action-packed and certainly luscious to look at, it is obvious that a lot of the sets are paintings and that the squid is as phony as Tarzan's rubber crocodiles. Lindsay and Woods have absolutely no chemistry, and Bogart's feisty performance allows him to easily steal the film, the very same year that he became a full-fledged star with the film version of "The Petrified Forest". There's a religious theme with one of the older men on the island using the story of David and Bathsheba to provide a warning to Woods about stealing another man's wife. That was done more profoundly in the original version which as a film had better casting among the second leads. The appearance of the seemingly dancing squid creates a few unintentional chuckles, but overall this is too entertaining and a major milestone in Bogart's career to pass over.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Surprising Find
dmhawkeyeguy13 January 2024
Being a Bogart fan, I had to check this one out. The poster and publicity shots were intriguing. This didn't look like a Bogie picture at all. This was quite enjoyable. The only thing subpar was the budget and production values. The story line, based on a novel by W. Somerset Maugham, and the performances were all first rate. The story includes more than one man of mystery, a love triangle, a bible-quoting doctor, a heroic sidekick, double-crossing, Bogie working against a deadline, and a tension-filled ending. For performances, you have an early Bogie role showing his hopeless romantic side but featuring him being rescued instead of the other way around. Margaret Lindsay and Donald Woods create the other two angles in the love triangle and are quite likeable in their roles. E. E. Clive is perfect as the resident doctor, dispensing medicine and advice in equal doses. Yes, the special effects are laughable and the storm could have been staged better. But unlike some of his other early films, this is one less known Bogie film that bears repeated viewing.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed