Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man (1943) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
142 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
The Underrated One
jluis198413 December 2005
Of all of the later Frankenstein movies made by Universal, this one seems to be overlooked when compared to the previous "Ghost of Frankenstein" or the campy fun of "House of Frankenstein". Nevertheless, "Frankenstein Meets the Wolfman" is probably the best of the bunch.

A direct sequel to both "The Wolf Man" and "Ghost of Frankenstein", the plot follows Larry Talbot (played again by Lon Chaney Jr.), the werewolf, who realizes that he can't die. In order to find inner peace he is on a quest for death, and Maleva, the gypsy, takes him to Vasaria, in order to fin Dr. Frankenstein. When they realize that Frankenstein is dead, Talbot finds the Creature (Bela Lugosi), now with Ygor's brain but severely damaged. When a doctor teams up with Talbot in order to help him, the Wolf Man won't be happy to discover the doctor's true intentions.

This movie is carried by Chaney Jr. who is totally inside the character of the Wolf Man. It is probably Chaney's best performance as beast, and he steals every scene he is in. As Talbot, he shows the horrible trauma of being an unwilling murderer, giving the character a greater presence that fills the screen with charm.

Bela Lugosi, as the creature, has more troubles to be satisfying, but it is important to note that most of his scenes were changed as the previous subplot of Ygor's brain was abandoned. Bad choice since the first scenes with the monster show him confused and blind without giving any explanation. The poor editing is responsible of Lugosi's apparent bad performance.

The rest of the cast is surprisingly good, with old friends like Lionel Atwill and Dwight Frye in small supporting roles. Beautiful Ilona Massey plays Elsa Frankenstein who in an odd change appears as a cold smart businesswoman vastly different from the character's traits in "Ghost of Frankenstein". Nevertheless, Massey plays the role with grace and her beauty shines in the screen.

Director Roy William Neill, known for his Sherlock Holmes movies, does a superior work than predecessor Erle C. Kenton and makes the most of his actors. Depsite the plot holes of the story and the awful changes the studio made to the original script, the movie flows with a good pace.

The whole atmosphere is an improvement that while it never reaches the levels of "Bride" or "Son", works very well and give the film a distinctive look.

Overall, a worthy addition to the Frankenstein saga, that even when it certainly could have been better, it is an enjoyable underrated movie. 7/10
30 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Frankenstein meets the Wolf Man in another fun film from Universal
TheLittleSongbird22 December 2014
Not one of Universal's best horror entries (it's not as good as its predecessor The Wolf Man, which is a very good film indeed), but it holds up well as a fun and charming film with a lot of atmosphere. It does end too abruptly for my tastes and Bela Lugosi looks very ill at ease, too sharp-featured and far from imposing as the Frankenstein monster. To be fair though to Lugosi it is not entirely his fault, as the character is poorly developed and written and you can actually tell that his screen time was intended to have been longer, hence why some of the story was in want of more explanation(the blindness was important and that was literally ignored). Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man is a very good-looking film, it's beautifully shot with eerie lighting and the sets give off a real Gothic horror atmosphere but look sumptuous at the same time. The music fits well, complimenting the thrills without sounding overbearing and stock. The script is very witty and cohesive with only with the monster where it felt incomplete, while the story is always compelling filled with entertainment and the scares positively thrill. Especially good is the opening sequence which is brilliant, so chilling and effectively atmospheric that you are excited to see what follows afterwards, to me it is one of the best openings to a Universal horror during this period and even after. The monster brawl is a lot of fun as well. Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man is skilfully directed throughout, is briskly paced, the characters are engaging without being fully dimensional and the acting is mostly solid apart from Lugosi. Illona Massey is a smouldering and unusually smart Elsa and Dwight Frye and Lionel Atwill provide entertaining support. Coming off best is Lon Chaney Jnr as Talbot aka The Wolf Man who's superb, goose bump-inducing but movingly sympathetic as well. His makeup is just as good as it was in The Wolf Man. Overall, fun, charming and atmospheric, not perfect by any stretch but well worth the watch and goes very well with The Wolf Man. 7/10 Bethany Cox
15 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not a classic, but a decent sequel.
Teknofobe706 April 2005
A year after The Wolf Man became a huge success, Lon Chaney Jr played the part of Frankenstein in the latest sequel "Ghost of Frankenstein". He was excellent in the role, and from that you can clearly see where the inspiration came from to combine the two strands and have these characters meet each other. Incidentally, Chaney also played a vampire later that year in "Son of Dracula", even though he was completely unsuited to the part, but that makes him the only actor to play all three of Universal's main monsters. Oh, and he also played the Mummy in "The Mummy's Tomb".

Anyway, I digress ... here we have Curt Siodmak, writer of The Wolf Man, returning again as screenwriter. All of the ingredients are there for a great sequel. It opens in Larry Talbot's tomb, with two graverobbers breaking in and disturbing his resting place. The moonlight comes through the window and falls on Larry's corpse, waking him from his slumber as the wolf man. He then gets taken to a hospital where he is deemed insane due to his insistence that he's a werewolf, but promptly escapes in search of the gypsy woman from the original film. She takes him to Frankenstein's town in search of his scientific expertise, and there he encounters Frankenstein's monster encased in ice ... my memory is a little hazy, but wasn't he consumed in fire at the end of the last movie? Ah, well.

It should really have been called "The Wolf Man Meets Frankenstein", because Frankenstein here is only a fairly minor character in the story. Lon Chaney Jr delivers another great performance, at least as good as that in the first film if not better. Of course, he does only have to have one mood to convey here -- desperation. Bela Lugosi, much as I love him, is a terrible Frankenstein. He's the wrong size and shape, and he clearly has no respect for the role. Thank god he doesn't appear for that long. Although having said that, it does kind of make sense that he plays the monster, as the brain of his Igor character was placed in Frankenstein's head at the end of the previous movie. Not that they have much continuity other than that.

The script certainly has it's moments, and the atmosphere of the two worlds of the Wolf Man and Frankenstein blend together fairly well, but on the whole this film just doesn't have enough interesting ideas and far too many dull moments. The set pieces are decent enough, but certainly not as striking as those in the earlier Frankenstein movies. Also, there's a fair bit of decidedly wooden acting from certain cast members, but that's to be expected from most of Universal's horror films.

This sequel is entertaining enough, but it's not half as good as it could have been. It's worth watching if you liked the original.
24 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Best of the Wartime Universal Monster Movies
ANDREWEHUNT29 December 2004
"Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man" (1943) is, in the opinion of this reviewer, the last of the really good Universal monster features. It is definitely not in the same league as the the early James Whale and Todd Browning classics (e.g., "Frankenstein," "The Bride of Frankenstein," "Dracula," "The Invisible Man," etc.). Nor is it quite as strong as "The Son of Frankenstein." But it easily rivals "The Ghost of Frankenstein" and far surpasses the two House Of films ("House of Frankenstein" and "House of Dracula"). Lon Chaney Jr. is even better in this film than he is in the original "Wolf Man" (1941). And Lugosi is an impressive Frankenstein's monster, despite the studio's decision to cut references from the film to his blindness (a condition suffered by the monster in "The Ghost of Frankenstein") and his dialogue (again, from acquiring the brain of Ygor in "Ghost"). The film is beautifully photographed, well acted and a unique departure from previous Universal monster fests in the way it teams up two legendary creatures. It's a splendid later entry in the Universal horror cycle. After this, the universal horror films left much to be desired, at least until the magnificent "Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein" (1948). I still put "Frankenstein meets the Wolf Man" in the DVD player if I'm feeling like watching what in my opinion is the studio's finest wartime horror film.
32 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Creepy Beginning, Funny Development and Lame Conclusion
claudio_carvalho21 November 2013
In Llanwelly village, two grave robbers break in the crypt of Lawrence "Larry" Stewart Talbot (Lon Chaney Jr.) to steal his possessions. When they open the casket, they find the body covered with wolfbane and they are attacked by a creature. Soon Talbot awakes in Cardiff at the Queen's Hospital recovering from a surgery performed by Dr. Mannering (Patric Knowles) and Inspector Owen (Dennis Hoey) is ready to interrogate him about recent murders.

Talbot flees from the hospital and seeks out the gypsy Maleva (Maria Ouspenskaya), who knows that he is a werewolf, asking her to help him. Talbot wants to die and they travel to find Dr. Frankenstein. Talbot transforms into the werewolf and falls into the frozen catacombs of Dr. Frankenstein's castle. He finds the Monster (Bela Lugosi) frozen and he breaks the ice and release it. Soon Talbot discovers that Dr. Frankenstein is dead and he seeks out the daughter of Dr. Frankenstein, Baroness Elsa Frankenstein (Ilona Massey), expecting to borrow his journal that contains the secret of life and death. Meanwhile Dr. Mannering arrives in the village following the blood track left by the werewolf. When Elsa lends the diary of her father, Dr. Mannering prepares the equipment to drain power from Talbot to the Monster. But he becomes insane with the power on his hands and the experiment goes wrong.

"Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man" is a movie by Universal with a creepy beginning in the environment of the cemetery and a sensational transformation of Talbot into the werewolf in slow motion. The development of the plot is dramatic and funny, with the encounter of the Wolf Man with the Monster and Talbot wishing to die. Unfortunately the lame conclusion is terrible. My vote is six.

Title (Brazil): "Frankenstein Encontra o Lobisomem" ("Frankenstein Meets the Werewolf")
20 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Very Good Sequel Blending Two Classic Monster Movies
sddavis6331 March 2008
I confess that I had low expectations when I watched this. Sequels generally don't blow me away to begin with, and my guess was that Universal Pictures was going a bit over the top in trying to milk the "monster cow" by putting these two together. I suppose that one of the great benefits of low expectations, however, is that you stand a chance of being pleasantly surprised, and I was. This was actually a pretty good movie, which has a decent, if far fetched, story line (of course it is about a werewolf and Frankenstein's monster, so far-fetched was inevitable) and it moves along at a very good pace, since there's really no need for significant character development.

Lon Chaney reprised his role as Larry Talbot here, the unfortunate man bitten by a werewolf, who was killed at the end of "The Wolf Man." In this movie, grave robbers open his casket, but unfortunately they do it during a full moon, which somehow brings him back to life. This movie introduces the significance of the full moon (as I recall in the original, it was an autumn moon that was significant.) Chaney is more heavily made up in this one, and after some unfortunate incidents in Wales, he leaves for Europe to try to find the Gypsy woman Maleva (Maria Oustenskaya) from the first movie, who he believes can help him. Instead, she directs him to Dr. Frankenstein. Unfortunately, he's dead, but his monster (played here by Bela Lugosi instead of Boris Karloff) isn't, and the movie eventually leads up to a confrontation between the monster and the werewolf - and the monster seems to get the best of the fight actually! The supporting cast in this includes Patrick Knowles as Dr. Mannering, the doctor who first treats Talbot in Wales and then finally searches him out in Europe - and who essentially is the Dr. Frankenstein of this movie. Introduced to Frankenstein's experiments, he also becomes obsessed with them which leads to the clash between the creatures. Ilona Massey played Baroness Frankenstein, the late doctor's daughter. It's pretty good, and the story works far better than I thought it would, although I thought Baroness Frankenstein was received far too civilly by the villagers who hated her father. The musical scene at the village festival also seemed out of place to me. The ending seemed unsatisfying, as well. Without giving too much away, I find it hard to believe that either creature was killed by what happened at the end, given that neither seemed able to be killed! Still, it's enjoyable, and a good job of blending two otherwise unrelated horror stories. 7/10
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fun enough, but somewhat lacking
The_Void1 October 2006
Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man may not be the most interesting film that Universal studios made in their horror golden era, but it's worth noting for the fact that it was the first of their films to merge the studio's popular horror characters into one film. There's no Dracula here, and it's actually the least famous of the three major players, the Wolfman, that takes the centre stage. Naturally, Lon Chaney Jr. has returned to play the doomed unfortunate with the curse, and as ever; his performance is good, but not to the same extent that it was in the original Wolfman film. The film was released during the Second World War, and must have been intended as something fun to take people's mind off more important issues; and it at least succeeds on that front. The plot is rather silly, and sees Lawrence Talbot (a.k.a. The Wolfman) being awakened by grave robbers. He doesn't like the fact that he's immortal and feels the need to kill people, so he sets out to find Dr Frankenstein for help. However, the doctor is dead; and Talbot finds only a relative of Frankenstein's, and the Monster...

It has to be said that there's a bit too much going on in this film, and the hour runtime isn't enough to cover it all. Aside from the main plot revolving around the Wolfman and his discovery of Frankenstein's Monster, we've also got threads involving Frankenstein's relatives, a gypsy woman, Talbot's own personal battle and the common angry/frightened villagers theme that Universal horror does so well. Frankenstein Meets the Wolfman is never boring, but if the plot line could have been streamlined; the film would have worked better. The film features the only performance from Bela Lugosi as the Monster. Lugosi was, apparently, offered the role of the Monster in James Whale's original film; and I'm glad he didn't take it, as he doesn't bring the same feel to the role as Karloff ended up doing. Series regular Lionel Atwill also makes an appearance, and I was pleased to see Dennis Hoey in the film; an actor most recognised for his performances as the inept Inspector Lestrade in Universal's Sherlock Holmes films. Overall, I have to say that I preferred the later films, House of Frankenstein and House of Dracula; but this one is still worth seeing.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Pretty Good
plato-1131 December 1999
Actually surprisingly good, considering that this movie and the previous Frankenstein Monster film (The Ghost of Frankenstein) don't really tie together. (Up until this movie they had done a pretty good job of doing that.) I love the village of Vasaria. All the villagers (who were probably supposed to have lived there their entire lives) have assorted accents. ALso because the background villagers dress in a Tyrolean style while the main characters dress in modern clothes. Lon Chaney's performance as the Wolf Man is actually better than it was in the first film because Larry Talbot has become more tortured as a result of his werewolf-ism.The actress that plays Frankenstein's daughter isn't that good at all. Overall, this is an entertaining entry in the Frankenstein series.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Loved it when I was a kid; still love it now!
Prichards123454 February 2011
Warning: Spoilers
This is really as cheeky a concept as you can get for a movie: a classic literary character from the work of Mary Shelley meets a 1940s-created Hollywood werewolf! And yet, as my ten-year old self discovered, and as my older and not in the least more sophisticated adult self realises, it's a film that really works.

For one thing, it's wonderfully atmospheric, thanks to Roy William Neill's moody direction, crisp cinematography and sincere performances from the actors. The opening shot is one of the best in Universal's horror cannon, the camera dollying over a gloomy cemetery while crows hop and croak as two grave robbers make their way to the Talbot tomb. They didn't choose the time particularly well, for it is a full moon, and all that's needed to bring the Wolfman (Lon Chaney) back from the dead is its silver-white touch on Talbot's dead hand.

Chaney is excellent as the tormented Talbot; unfortunately studio interference - the editing out of the monster's (played by Bela Lugosi) dialogue and blindness (until the end) make Bela's performance inexplicable to those not in the know. Happily we have compensations in the form of Lionel Atwill, Maria Ouspenskaya, Dwight Frye (back for a last Universal hurrah before his untimely death) and the ravishing Ilona Massey. We even have Inspector Lestrade turn up in the form of Denis Hoey. He might be called Inspector Owen in this movie, but he's got the same overcoat and bowler Hoey wears in his Rathbone Sherlock Holmes' movies.

Talbot escapes from an asylum and heads for Visaria, seeking the secret of Frankenstein's unholy science. He just wants to die and end the torture of his 3 times a month transformations. After various adventures he thaws out Henry's creation and the two quickly turn up Frankenstein's Secrets of Life And Death diary; the monster (with Ygor's brain inside him - see Ghost of Frankenstein) is also seeking to be restored to full power.

Frankenstein Meets The Wolfman even has a barnstorming musical song as the village celebrates the Festival of The New Wine, "For life is short and death is long" being verbal torture for Talbot. The monster comes searching for his new friend and certainly puts a dampener on things for the villagers!

The climactic fight between our titans of terror may have dated but it worked for audiences of the time and on the whole this is a film I never tire of re-watching.

To summarise, cheeky concept, excellent movie!
15 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Uneven, but a watchable entry
Panamint10 January 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Part of this film takes place in Frankenstein's basement. But the problem here is that mostly this is bargain-basement Frankenstein in general. EXCEPT for some of the acting, and for the atmosphere which is first-rate.

Knowles is alright but is bargain basement Basil Rathbone/Colin Clive. He's capable but bland. Ms. Massey is a cut-rate Evelyn Ankers but again, is capable and has the added advantage of a German-tinged European accent. And poor old Lugosi is wasted in a badly conceived role (oh well I guess you can't have a Wolfman sequel at the Frankenstein castle without having Frankenstein's monster at least show up).

Chaney is first-rate and vividly recreates his immortal Lawrence Talbot. He is great and not to be missed.

Three huge pluses: Ouspenskaya, Dennis Hoey and of course Lionel Atwill were three of the best character actors who ever lived and keep this film watchable.

The early cemetery scenes are fine old horror atmosphere, and I really enjoyed the highly creative ice-bound catacomb scenes featuring the two unfortunate monsters.

Plot holes, bad editing, chopped grafted together story are the misses, so I can recommend this only with reservations, mainly for the occasional streaks of brilliance to be found here.

And yes, horror fans will love it.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The Odd Couple of Anti-Monsters
Coventry23 December 2006
When grave robbers break into Larry Talbot's family crypt and demolish his final resting place, the Wolf Man is inexplicably resurrected and once again doomed to go on a violent killing spree whenever the moon is full. Larry realizes the horror he causes and wants to die, but there's no one who can help him. Personally, I would consider shooting myself through the head using a silver bullet, but that doesn't really deliver a worthwhile and long enough film, so the uncanny gypsy woman of the original advises him to travel across Europe and search for the notorious Dr. Frankenstein who holds in his knowledge the secret of life and death. By the time they arrive in Vasaria, the Baron already got lynched by an angry mob of villagers and only his monstrous creation still dwells around in the ruins of Castle Frankenstein. "Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man" is a classic Universal horror production starring some of my all-time favorite actors and, even though I can't bring myself to speak overly negative about it, it's a truly silly and redundant accomplishment. Those who are expecting to see a ancient predecessor of, say, "Freddy vs. Jason" will be sorely disappointed as the two legendary monsters don't fight each other – except maybe briefly near the end -, they just MEET like the title implies. Hence what this film is lacking is a truly evil character! Whenever the werewolf devours a new victim, he spends the next fifteen minutes whining about how sorry he is (which kind of spoils the fun of it) and Frankenstein's monster is even more pathetic as he just stumbles across the little town for no apparent reason. Larry Talbot's dedicated doctor seems to reincarnate as Baron Frankenstein for a moment, worshiping his experiments and being reluctant to destroy his creation, but this sub plot doesn't really go anywhere as it's interfered with an incredibly implausible love story. But the saddest and most painful establishment of them all is to witness how aimlessly Bela Lugosi walks around in this film... Boris Karloff wisely decided to stop associating his charisma with that of the monster after "Son of Frankenstein" in 1939 and Lugosi inherited a nearly washed up character that didn't petrify anyone anymore. Bela, once a highly respected and acclaimed horror icon, stood at the beginning of his career's downfall here and his further life story is one of the saddest ones in history. And yet, as stated before, I really can't be TOO harsh on this little film! Lon Chaney Jr tries really hard to provide his wolf man character with depth and emotion, Roy William Neill's direction is professional & fast-paced and several sequences are beautifully filmed. The werewolf's make-up effects have also seemly improved and the transformation scenes are the only times when the film is still a little creepy. I guess the most essential message this production communicates is that cinematic greed and exploitation are of all times! People are nowadays complaining about the overload of needless sequels, rip-offs and remakes of inventive horror films, but "Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man" proves that this certainly isn't a new trend.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Universal Smackdown
simeon_flake8 February 2005
One must pity the Wolf Man. Marked not only with the pentagram, but marked to never have a sequel that was all his own. A real shame, considering that even the likes of the Mummy got 'four' sequels. Universal begins their monster-mash rallies of the 1940s here, as Wolfie must share his sandbox with the "undying monster" & the two get along well for the most part, but eventually, even the best of friends will have their disputes....

The film begins on a very high note, with one of the most chilling and atmospheric openings in any horror movie. The potential was certainly here for a great 'Wolf Man' sequel that could've surpassed the original. Too bad the monster has to rear his ugly, stitched up head.

Speaking of that monster, "Poor Bela" always get the blame dumped on him for why this film had to be chopped up in post-production, the story always being that the monster with his voice was simply too "Hungarian funny", yet this film was produced by the same Universal that a year earlier made "Ghost of Frankenstein" which featured the monster with Bela's voice. It didn't bother anyone then, so what was the problem now? There has to be more to the story than "it was all Lugosi's fault". Would it be considered out of the realm of possibility to speculate that perhaps the great Curt Siodmak (the screenwriter) wrote some seriously crappy dialogue for the creature to recite that would've produced titters no matter who spoke it?

Also marring the proceedings a bit is some shaky continuity in regards to the monster's portion of the story if you're familiar with the previous 'Ghost' movie. How is it, that there's suddenly a Frankenstein castle in Vasaria (or is it Vi·Saria), when in the previous film, the villagers in the town called "Frankenstein" blew it up. And there are many instances where the screenwriter doesn't seem to know the difference between Ludwig Frankenstein & his father Henry who made the monster, as Talbot, the villagers, even Baroness Frankenstein speak as if Ludwig actually created the monster.

And yet, in spite of its inconsistencies (not to mention the heavy editing done to it), the whole of 'FMTWM' still turns out very good, and the ending clash of the monsters is very entertaining. While Frankenstein fans may be disappointed, this picture definitely works as a great 'Wolf Man' sequel & one of the top Universal romps from the 1940s. After this picture, Dracula and a few other fiends would get invited to the monster party.

8/10
41 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Classic monsters, but not a classic movie
happyendingrocks11 May 2011
Warning: Spoilers
This pairing of two of Universal's most celebrated creations is an enjoyable enough romp in its own right, but the end result musters far less excitement than either of the titular monsters capably generated on their own. Though Franky meets Wolfy boasts high production values and some inspired moments, the film ultimately never plays above what it is: an attempt to make a few bucks by capitalizing on the popularity of two iconic characters.

Lon Chaney, Jr. reprises his role as Larry Talbot, who finds himself very much alive despite the conclusion of the original Wolf Man thanks to the intervention of two grave robbers who make the foolish mistake of breaking into his crypt during a full moon. Determined to rid himself of his dreadful curse, Talbot once again enlists the aid of the gypsy woman Maleva, who suggests he seek out a scientist who could offer assistance: one Dr. Frankenstein.

Chaney once again handles the material very well, but he is hampered by a script that is not nearly as sharp as the one he was offered in his previous lycanthropy yarn. This sequel's version of Larry Talbot requires him to often lapse into histrionics, so there are scenes in the film which stray away from the horror genre and veer into straight-up melodrama, and some of the dialogue is ultimately pretty atrocious.

Portions of the film make very little sense, such as the crucial moment when The Wolf Man finds himself trapped in the makeshift castle of Dr. Frankenstein, the basement of which is apparently a subterranean snow cavern (?). When Talbot awakes in this frigid locale, he discovers the Monster trapped in a wall of ice, upon which he frees Frank and forms a tenuous alliance. Of course, the selling point for the film is the opportunity to see these two titans of terror do battle, so it's probably not giving anything away to inform you that they eventually do.

Jack Pierce's werewolf make-up is darker and more realistic this time out, but the transformation effects aren't any stronger than the camera elapses used in the original. Unfortunately, the fashionable Wolf Man makes a repeat appearance, and Chaney's clothing changes are no less confusing than they were before. The initial transformation occurs while Chaney is dressed in pajamas, but once again the shots of The Wolf Man on the prowl show him clad in the same matching attire he wore in the first film. When Chaney awakes following his full-moon sojourn, he is once again wearing his jammies, which suggests that when he becomes a werewolf he not only delays his hunt to change clothes, but also feels inclined to change back before going to sleep.

Though the idea of enlisting Bela Lugosi to portray the Monster must have sounded great on paper, he lacks the sheer size and physicality of Boris Karloff, and his performance is nowhere near as nuanced or effective. Here, the Monster is simply a monster, not a character, and though there is genuine historical and curiosity value inherent in this interesting bit of casting, it's impossible to watch the film without comparing Lugosi's stiff staggering to Karloff's imposing and indelible presence.

A cameo by Dwight Frye spices things up a bit, but most of the film merely goes through the motions, making no attempt to add anything substantial to the mythos of either marquee attraction. Their climactic showdown is ultimately far too brief and anti-climactic to live up to the promise implied by the title, and the film concludes with a dynamite-induced flood which buries both creatures, ostensibly preserving them for future sequels.

Fans of either monster will still enjoy this outing, but while the original Wolf Man and Frankenstein films offered plenty of subtext rife for examination, this outing never aspires to be much more than a disposable bit of mindless escapism. At that, it succeeds handily, but it's unlikely even the most forgiving Universal Monsters fan will revisit this misguided royal rumble very often.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Universal Fun!
terrorfan15 May 2001
Though not nearly up to the standards and fun level of "Ghost Of Frankenstein", this neat little Universal gem has it's heart in the right place! Wonderful opening sequence in the graveyard, plenty of atmosphere, typically gorgeous Universal studio sets and it's famous monsters! What more can you ask for? Chaney is superb as the tormented Larry Talbot but Bela leaves quite a bit to be desired as the monster. Universal would have been better off using Glen Strange one film earlier instead of waiting for 1944's "House Of Frankenstein". All in all, a fun film that staggers a bit after a rip-roaring start!
25 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Intriguing Title But Not That Great
Theo Robertson18 January 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This has got a great concept of matching up two of Universal's great monster creations in the same film . Unfortunately as is common within great concept movies the potential isn't fully realised

The major problem is that the screenwriter Curt Siodmak seems unable to find a different approach in order to tell the story . THE WOLF MAN was a rather threadbare plot and probably shows what a very limited concept werewolf movies are . The first half of the movie plays out like a werewolf movie then moves to Frankenstein's homeland and involves the monster

There's two very obvious flaws to the story . First off there's zero continuity to the previous Frankenstein movie where Ygor was the monster who became blind . Apparently he has regained his sight but lost his powers of speech . In fact the story could have taken place immediately after SON OF FRANKENSTEIN and no one would have been able to tell the difference . There is a myth according to film historians that Lugosi was given dialogue where he states that his monster is blind and that accounts for his performance with arms outstretched but it's obvious in many scenes that the monster still has his sight retained

The second flaw is the geographical location which is recognisably central Europe in the 1940s . Unfortunately it seems to be on a parallel world where there is no war even though this country has a fascist mindset where ethnic minorities like Gypsies are not welcome . It seems totally ridiculous that characters can move freely from England to this European hinterland . It's obvious by characters costumes that is very much a Germanzed country and it's strange that being a German Jewish émigré Siodmak didn't emphasis an anti-Nazi subtext to the tale

That said it is a fairly entertaining film if you overlook its silliness . It does have a very memorable opening sequence where two grave robbers break in to the vault of the Talbot family . Lugosi isn't as bad as his reputation suggests as the monster and the film moves at a fairly brisk pace . You do get the feeling that the film could have been a lot better than it finally appears on screen
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
enjoyable entry in horror series
HelloTexas1111 August 2008
Warning: Spoilers
For a second-tier horror film only running 74 minutes, 'Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man' certainly had a tortured history, most having to do with Bela Lugosi's much-maligned portrayal of Frankenstein's Monster. Lugosi, who was considered for the role in the original 'Frankenstein' but ultimately dropped in favor of Boris Karloff, finally got the opportunity here at age 60. Let's just say Karloff's reputation is safe as the definitive Monster. Lugosi stumbles around, flailing his stiff arms in what seems at times a parody. There were reasons for this though, which are not explained in the finished film, and which are not all Lugosi's fault. As originally intended, it would be explained that the creature is practically blind from the experiment which ended the previous film. Also, Lugosi's version would have quite a bit of spoken dialogue. Screenwriter Curt Siodmak claims that audiences in test screenings laughed at the Monster speaking with Lugosi's thick Hungarian accent. Lugosi had no less than THREE stand-ins; in fact, the opening close-up of the Monster trapped in the ice is clearly not Lugosi. Eventually, the part of the story involving the Monster was heavily trimmed in favor of a new first half dealing with the Wolf Man. Lon Chaney Jr. reprises his role as Larry Talbot aka the Wolf Man, and we are reminded that this character must be one of the most miserably unhappy ones ever to grace the silver screen. There is a certain grim humor in hearing Talbot say, "But what can you do to end MY life?" in what seems the umpteenth variation of that line. Talbot's morbid yet sometimes cheerful insistence on being put to death (in fact, about the only time he seems cheerful in any of the films) is a trademark of the character. 'Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man,' as finally released, is split almost exactly in half. The first concerns the Wolf Man's reappearance, Talbot's stay in an English hospital, and ultimately his meeting up with the old gypsy woman Maleva (Maria Ouspenskay's signature role). From there, they head to Dr. Frankenstein's castle in Germany (hell, I guess it's in Germany) to find his notebook, "The Secrets of Life and Death." After a point, they are joined by Talbot's doctor (Patrick Knowles) and guess what? He decides that he can make Frankenstein's experiment a success, because HE won't make the same mistakes. This is a perennial feature of the Frankenstein films. 'Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man' is an entertaining entry in the venerable series, despite Lugosi's lumbering portrayal and a seemingly interminable musical number halfway through the film. Though both monsters are swept away by a flood after a brief, pitched battle at the end, they would return for two more sequels and, finally, to meet Abbott & Costello.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Good Sequel to WolfMan
jomtcl10 September 2008
I Was just looking at it the other day and enjoyed and thought it was better than the wolf man much more action and suspense and the acting by Lon Chaney was great his emotional feel to the character is a one of a kind like he emphasize with the tortured Talbot like when he about to turn on the wagon with the gypsy woman talk about good acting but the story gets crazy with missing parts unexplained moments have you rubbing your head but still enough action to keep you on your seats i also liked Patric Knowles as well as the doctor mannering too bad at the end he found out too late and couldn't help talbot anyway and boy he was into a treat at the end almost getting caught in battle with the wolf man and The monster !!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Starts out as a great sequel to 'The Wolf Man'
the_mysteriousx20 October 2003
The first half hour of this film is as good as any horror film Universal made in the forties, including the original Wolf Man. Really, what doesn't work so well is the fact that the whole Frankenstein story is added to it.

Chaney is really excellent in this film. If you watch the Wolf Man films in order, his whole wanting-to-die routine is not old in this one. He has some stand out acting moments, particularly when he terrifies the happy village singer by screaming at him that he doesn't want to live forever. It is perfectly awkward, embarrassing and disturbing. This film also boasts the very best transformation scenes from man to wolf. In my opinion, the first one in the hospital bed is the best special effect John Fulton ever did.

As a Wolf Man sequel, this film does an excellent job in consistency and following up on the previous film's characters. Maria Ouspenkaya returns as the gypsy woman, with Chaney begging her to help him die as she did for her son, Bela. We find out that Sir John died shortly after the events of the first film, adding a sad feeling and a further need for Lawrence (Chaney) to die.

As a Frankenstein sequel (to Ghost of Frankenstein), this film is practically an abomination. The monster was blind and had the brain of Ygor. For whatever reason someone at the top of Universal, after filming this picture, decided to remove all of the monster's dialogue and references to his blindness. Lugosi, who played the Monster was a good choice since he was Ygor in the previous two films. Viewers of this film must have prior knowledge that the monster is supposed to be blind otherwise Lugosi's performance looks disastrous. As it is, it's not great, but it is such a poorly written part based on the completed version. We can tell the monster is blind when he walks into the village and Chaney comes up to him and grabs him on the arm and says "It's me!". Obviously, you wouldn't do that to someone who could see you!! And on top of this, there are the usual inconsistencies between the Frankenstein films i.e. long-unknown relatives show up out of nowhere, who now are supposed to know everything about the monster; the villagers love/hate relationship with the Frankensteins, etc.

It's really too bad The Wolf Man never had a solo sequel. Considering Universal made 4 mummy sequels and 3 solo Frankenstein sequels, I always wonder why they left Dracula and the Wolf Man at bay. Particularly, the poor Wolf Man. If the second half of this film continued to only follow the Wolf Man, I think it would have topped the original. As it is, this has the Wolf Man kill more and the his make-up and action are truly excellent. The whole opening at the crypt and scenes in the hospital are terrific and actually improve on the original story in how the plot is not tied down into explaining the Wolf Man legend and introducing the character.

Roy William Neill's direction is fast paced and interesting. He keeps the camera moving - the opening shot in the graveyard is a true classic horror moment. The sets are perfect and eerie. The ending is fun, with a short but memorable battle of the titans. The acting is good too, with Atwill, Hoey and Dwight Frye in his last film, lending their professional, solid support.

That being said, this is ultimately Chaney's film. I am not a big fan of his acting, but he really has the part down in this film and for once someone needs to compliment his performance as the actual Wolf Man. He always gets praise for playing Larry Talbot, but he is athletic, wild and rampant as the Wolf Man in this film and he really carries the whole movie.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Still great Universal Horror Cinema !
ducatimatz2827 December 2013
Ironic that Bela Lugosi who turned down the Frankstein Monster Role in 1931 because he thought it was beneath his acting skills and that the Monster had no speaking dialog; takes on the Role his one and only time.

Probably the least scary of the three others that did the role(KARLOFF,CHANEY,STRANGE) Even with the built up Boots he still looked small compared to the other Monster Players.If your observant you can see veteran stunt man EDDIE PARKER doing some of the more physical scenes and when the monster is first discovered frozen in the ice.

I first saw this movie on Television in 1957 when Universal was releasing their Horror Films to TV. Unless you were born in the 20's, 30's or had access to a Nostaglia theater you most likely have never seen it on anything but a TV Screen. That why its hard to judge the old horror films when your seeing Dracula, The Wolfman, and The Monster as just being a few inches tall, your not going to get the impact as if you were seeing a life size or larger Figure. After you saw the shark in "JAWS" at a Movie Theater could you possible be as terrified when it came to Television and The 25ft Great White was only a foot long. Of course as a 9 year old I was still scared but I always wondered how much more I would have been Scared seeing it at a theater.

Dwight Frye in a meager role as one of the towns people;this would be his last role in a Monster related film. after three other minor(uncredited) parts in forgotten films he died in 1943 from what Family members say was pure exhaustion from being a workaholic. Still one of the Great Universal Classics,I have it on 16mm film, VHS,and DVD...S.M.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fifth "Frankenstein" Meets Second " The Wolf Man".
AaronCapenBanner23 October 2013
Roy William Neill directed this crossover turning point for Universal Studios: Combining the "Frankenstein" series with a "Wolf Man" sequel, a bright idea, since I can see them co-existing. Larry Talbot(Lon Chaney Jr.) is accidentally revived by grave robbers, who then ends up in the hospital, a murder suspect. Four years have gone by, and his father Sir John has since died. Dr. Mannering(played by Patrick Knowles) decides to help Larry, but he transforms and escapes. Later, he reunites with Maleva, who accompanies him in his search for the one man who can help him end the curse: Ludwig Frankenstein. Dismayed to find the doctor dead, he meets up with his daughter Elsa(now played by Illona Massey) to buy her father's ruins so he can locate his notes. The subsequent arrival of Dr. Mannering coincides with the discovery of the monster, and both of them decide to help Larry, though it will once again not work out as planned, since the angry villagers have other ideas...

Good sequel is quite clever, though damaged by the miscasting Of Bela Lugosi as the monster, and some choppy editing muddling things. Still, Chaney is fine, and movie enjoyable despite these faults. A shame to think how much better this could have been though...
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Weak Part of the Universal Series
gavin694214 October 2013
Larry Talbot (Lon Chaney Jr) chips Frankenstein's monster (Bela Lugosi) out of a block of ice. When Talbot changes to the Wolf Man, the two creatures do battle.

First of all, the title is more than a little misleading. It seems to imply this is a Frankenstein story with the Wolf Man thrown in. On the contrary, it is almost exclusively a story about the Wolf Man, with a few minutes of Frankenstein's monster and a story arc with the doctor's daughter (played excellently by Ilona Massey).

As for being the further adventures of Talbot, it is okay and the script from Curt Siodmak is relatively well-written, with direction from Roy William Neill being quite good. But it goes downhill once Lugosi arrives, with his Frankenstein paling in comparison to the work of Boris Karloff. (Much of this, particularly Lugosi's wild gestures, can be explained by the monster's blindness, but this is not obvious to the audience and Lugosi's face is just not right in the way Karloff -- or even Glenn Strange -- was.)
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Fun but flawed, and don't blame Bela
stew1004 July 2000
It's true that this is a better sequel to "The Wolf Man" (in fact I like the first twenty-five minutes of this movie more that "The Wolf Man."), but it's a better Frankenstein film than "House of Frankenstein" or "House of Dracula" because the Monster has more to do here, and it's better than "Ghost of Frankenstein" just because it's more fun. Poor Bela Lugosi gets ripped all the time for what a terrible job he did as the Monster in this one, but in fairness his role was severely edited. The monster originally could talk and was blind, but the producers felt Lugosi's voice coming from the Monster was more funny than frightening, and his dialogue wasn't all that great anyway, so out it all went. It's for this reason that the monster acts so strangely in the final cut, and the Monster was supposed to be sick anyway. It was a mistake to cast the too old Lugosi as the Monster, but don't blame Bela -- he probably did the best he could, but we'll never know. I also think it was a mistake to cast Lon Chaney Jr. as the Monster in "Ghost." Both he and Lugosi were too round-faced to take over from Karloff. And the ending of "Ghost" was one of the biggest blunders in the entire series. But this film manages to survive all the mistakes and still be very entertaining. I've probably seen it fifty times in my life, and I can always watch it again.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I only want to die. That's why I'm here. If I ever find peace I'll find it here.
hitchcockthelegend8 October 2015
In an effort to revitalise their monster franchise at the box offices, Universal hit on the idea of of featuring more than one monster in a movie. Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man was to be the first of many such ventures.

Lon Chaney Jr is back as Larry Talbot/The Wolf Man, who after being awoken by unsuspecting grave robbers, is once again tortured by his curse and desperately wants an end to his misery. Seeking out the Gypsy woman Maleva (Maria Ouspenskaya), the pair of them head off to find Dr. Frankenstein in the hope of finding a solution. He's dead, though, but there's another scientist on hand for help and as the villagers once again take unkindly to someone rekindling old nightmares, all while the Frankenstein Monster (Bela Lugosi) is found preserved in ice...

It's in effect a sequel to both The Wolf Man and The Ghost of Frankenstein, though as would become the norm, Monster Frank is a bit part player in a film bearing his name. The film is delightfully brisk and with Chaney doing good work as the tortured Talbot - with the relationship between Maleva and himself quite touching - the story carries emotional weight. However, Lugosi doesn't look right for the role of the monster, Patrick Knowles' switcharoo to a mad scientist is ill thought out, while the big smack down finale is sadly all too brief.

Nobody in the film, except maybe Chaney, was done any favours in the editing and writing rooms, but it's still a whole bunch of fun for fans of the Universal Monsters series. 6/10
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not one of the best in either series
atinder20 July 2015
I didn't think it was as good as I expected to be

I thought it started off really well but as the movie went on.

I felt like something was missing from previous 2 movies for both series

I didn't really like how the movie ended far to quick for me , I felt like they a least could of done a bit of aftermath

I was not impressed with the fight scence , I was looking forward to that see but guess now away day it look a bit tame

The acting in this movie was really good from the whole cast

I am going to give this movie 5 out of 10
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed