The Lost Missile (1958) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
41 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Not bad - fine example of 50's Science Fiction movie fare
bdl74311 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
The Lost Missile was one of those movies I used to see on Saturday afternoon TV as a kid - it used to scare the heck out of me!

SPOILER - For some reason, a missile that flies at 4000 miles an hour appears from outer space over the (then) Soviet Union - they fire an interceptor missile at it, which knocks it into the atmosphere. The missile leaves a million degree heat trail which vaporizes everything in its path. The movie is primarily concerned with knocking it down.

The acting is somewhat melodramatic at points The story, typical for its time, has (for us nowadays) cheesy special effects - the missile looks like a drawing which to someone has added a flashing light bulb for a tail. The movie uses a lot of stock Defense footage - we see F-89 Scorpions, which carried a large number of unguided missiles in two wing tip pods, firing at the rocket, as well as F-86's, F-100's, F-94, B-52, B-36 - you name it! For anyone who is interested in vintage jet fighters and bombers, this is priceless!

One interesting note - if you're so inclined, look up Project Pluto sometime. This was a USAF project to develop a nuclear powered cruise missile that would fly at Mach 3 at treetop level - slightly over 2100 mph. There were those who thought that the radiation from the engine would poison vast areas of real estate. VERY similar to the movie, which came out a year later.
24 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Were supposed to get married this afternoon and all you can think of is a hydrogen warhead!
sol12182 April 2009
Warning: Spoilers
***Spoilers*** With the report of an unknown missile strafing the earth at 4,200 MPH it becomes vital for the nations on earth to stop it before it destroys all life on the planet! But How!

Top US nuclear scientist atomic physicists and aeronautical engineer Dr. David Loring, Robert Loggia, has to postpone his wedding plans with his fiancée and fellow scientist Joan Woods, Ellen Parker, at the prestigious Heavenbrook Atomic Labs outside New York City in order to stop the runaway missile from setting the world on fire! This has the disappointed future bride drop David like a hot potato not realizing, which as a nuclear scientist Joan should have, that the preventing of the earth from being destroyed is far greater then her wedding plans. In fact if these's no earth there sure as hell won't be a wedding!

As the renegade missile sweeps across Canada jets planes, from both the US and Canada, are scrambled to either force or shoot it down. With it's fantastic speed of 4,200 MPH the missile generates heat of over one million degrees which knocks out and burns to a crisps any plane that comes within five miles of it! When Dr. Loring finally comes up with a fool-proof plan to knock the unknown missile out of the sky his fellow scientist at the Havenbrook Labs Dr. Joe Freed, Philip Pine, suddenly has seconds thought about downing the damn thing! Having found out, were never shown how, that the missile is being operated by aliens from space Dr. Freed wants to have it and its alien crew saved for future studies, in the knowledge that the aliens can provide the human race, in scientific advancements!

As if things aren't going bad enough for Dr. Loring in his attempt to stop the lost missile, with a baby nuke that he devised, from obliterating the earth he together with Joan are carjacked by these 1950's greasers, or leather jacketed teenagers, on their way to the nearest USAF missile site. The unaware teens not knowing what their dealing with by being exposed to the plutonium, from he baby nuke, in Dr. Lorings' jeep soon end up being fatality radiated by it!

***SPOILERS*** With time and the films' meager budget quickly running out Dr. Loring makes it to the missile launch site with the baby nuke and knowing, by being exposed to it, that his life is kaput willfully sacrifices himself by putting the radiation emitting baby nuke into the missile's, known as Jobe, nose-comb. It's then that Jobe does its job, by knocking out the runaway missile, in saving the earth until another day or another movie like "The Lost Missile" comes around.

Skillfully spliced and integrated stock footage makes "The Lost Missile" hit its mark in keeping its audience glued to the screen without the special effects, of the 1950's, that the film so obviously lacks. There's also the film debut in the movie of African/American actor Hari Rhodes, who's extensive film credits include Samuels Fullers' "Shock Corridor" and the made for TV movie mega mini-series "Roots", as-according to the movie credits-the Black Man at the piano.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A classic from the '50s
ebiros218 April 2009
When I saw it as a kid, I didn't understand the premise of the story, and as an adult, I still have problem with the premise that a runaway missile from space starts to circle around the earth by sheer chance. I guess that's what makes this movie one of a kind. If you go beyond the incredible coincidence that this missile just happened to find earth and randomly started killing its inhabitants, the movie is pretty good sci-fi from the '50s. They try to make things look factual by using stock military footage, and use pseudonym of actual existing institution like Havenbrook (which is an obvious reference to Brookhaven National Laboratory).

The scary part of the movie is the glow you see over the horizon as the missile approaches, and the sound it makes. The movie is somewhat leaning towards horror genre in this respect, and what happens to the main protagonist as he attempts to stop the runaway missile. If you've seen this movie once, you'll never forget it - which makes this movie one of the sci-fi classics from the '50s.

If you can find it (as it's getting easier with so many posting of old movies on the internet), this movie is worth a glance.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Underrated
Michael_Elliott3 May 2009
Lost Missile, The (1958)

** 1/2 (out of 4)

Rarely talked about "scare" film has Robert Loggia playing a scientist who has an hour to try and create something that will stop a runaway missile that is reaching temperatures of one-million. The missile is destroying everything in its path and it's heading towards New York City. I was pleasantly surprised to see how great the actual story of this film was but sadly the budget is just so low that they can't do as much with it as I'm sure they had hoped. The movie contains a great story and one can't help but think this film would have certainly scared people back in the day who feared something like this would happen. The movie, due to its low budget, features a lot of stock footage, which gets old after a while but the movies central story is still top-notch. Loggia does a very good job in his role and it's always great to see this underrated character actor. Ellen Parker is also pretty good in her role of Loggia's fiancé. What really separates this film from plenty of others is that it's not scared to kill people. I won't ruin anything but there are several downbeat moments that you really don't expect to see but this here helps keep the suspense going because you know the film isn't scared to bump someone off. Again, it's a real shame that a major studio didn't pick up this story because with a few more on the budget it could have been something really great. As it is, this remains an underrated "B" movie.
16 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Ottawa - I Remember It Well
BaronBl00d4 October 2009
Very, very cheaply made sci-fi thriller from the Golden Age of the 1950s that surprisingly is much better than you might initially expect. Yes, its is undeniably cheaply made. Yes, many of the actors are sub-par. Yes, the story doesn't always make sense nor is it cohesive. Yes, there is plenty of stock footage for a film that isn't even 75 minutes long. What does it have going for it? Well, the story is entertaining as we follow the exploits of a hydrogen missile or some alien missile as it blazes its way from Alaska through Canada on its way to New York City turning everything it passes over nothing more than a burned cinder. Another reviewer noted that the film is not "scared" to kill people. How true and that is something very unique for a film like this and from the 1950s. It is refreshing(in a twisted way I guess). Robert Loggia does a credible job as the lead - an overworked scientist who is married to his job, fallen in love and out of favour with his fiancée Ellen Parker who is his co-worker as well. we get all the stereotypes one might imagine, but loggia nd even Parker show us enough depth of character to care. the scenes with the people huddling together to escape death are oddly convincing and the mood of the film stays tense throughout. this is not a great science fiction film by no means, but it is better than its budget would initially suggest.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
THE LOST MISSILE (Lester William Berke, 1958) **
Bunuel197628 June 2006
I had never heard of this one before it turned up on Cable TV. It's very typical of late 50s sci-fi: sober, depressing and not a little paranoid! Despite the equally typical inclusion of a romantic couple, the film is pretty much put across in a documentary style - which is perhaps a cheap way of leaving a lot of the exposition to narration and an excuse to insert as much stock footage as is humanly possibly for what is unmistakably an extremely low-budget venture! While not uninteresting in itself (the-apocalypse-via-renegade-missile angle later utilized, with far greater aplomb, for both DR. STRANGELOVE [1964] and FAIL-SAFE [1964]) and mercifully short, the film's single-minded approach to its subject matter results in a good deal of unintentional laughter - particularly in the scenes involving an imminent childbirth and a gang of clueless juvenile delinquents!
12 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Its like the newspaper the gift came wrapped in was more valuable than the gift.
max von meyerling1 April 2009
Really it's a dreadful cheat of a film. Its 70-minute running time is very well padded with stock footage. The rest are non descript exteriors and drab interiors scenes. The plot exposition is very poorly rendered. They are all just perfunctory scenes sort of strung together. There is no attempt at drama in scene selection but rather drama is communicated by the intensity of the actors. Please don't ask.

The plot concerns a rocket radiating a million degree heat orbiting earth five miles up threatening to destroy the earth. It's a real time menace that must be diverted if a custom built H-bomb can be fashioned and placed in an experimental rocket within an hour. Nothing very much here to report except for a mad speech by a scientist against the project because there might be some sort of life aboard and think of the scientific possibilities but this speech made by the obligatory idiot liberal was pretty much passé by then.

What saves this film, somewhat uniquely, IS the stock footage. I've never seen a larger selection of fifties jet fighter aircraft in any other film. This is by no means a complete list but just some of the aircraft I managed to see. There's a brief interception by a pilot flying, in alternate shots, an F-89 Scorpion and an F-86. First to scramble interceptors is the Royal Canadian Air Force in Hawker Hunters and F-86 Sabre Jets (or Canadian built CF-13s) and even a pair of CF-100 Clunks.

Then for some reason there are B-52s, B-47s and even B36s are seen taking off. More padding.

"These Canadian jets are moving at 1200 miles an hour". I don't think so since one of them appears to be a WW2 era Gloster Meteor, the rest F-80s. The Meteors press the attack and one turns into a late F-84F with a flight of early straight wing F-84s attacking in formation.

There's a strange tandem cockpit version of the F-80 that doesn't seem to be the T-33 training type but some sort of interim all-weather interceptor variant with radar in the nose. These are scrambled in a snowstorm.

An angled deck aircraft carrier is seen from about 500 meters. It launches F-8U Crusaders, F-11F Tigers, A-5 Vigilantes and A-3 Skywarriors. The Air Force scrambles F-86s and F-84s and more F-89s then you've ever seen in your life as well as F-100 Super Sabres and F-102 Delta Daggers.

The F-100s press their attack with sooooo much padding. The F-89's unload their rockets in their wingtip pods in slo mo. The F-86s fire, an F-102 lets loose a Falcon, even some F-80s (F-94s?) with mid-wing rocket pods let loose. There is a very strange shot of a late model F-84 (prototype?) with a straight wing early model F-85 above it in a turn, obviously a manufacturer's (Republic Aviation) advertising film showing the differences between the old and the new improved models of the F-84 ThunderJet. How it strayed into here is anybodies guess.

There is other great stock footage of Ottawa in the old days when the capital of Canada was a wide spot in the road and especially wonderful footage of New York City's Times Square during one of the Civil Defense Drills in the early 50s.

I think we also have to deal with the notion that this was filmed in Canada with the possible exception of the auto chase seen late in the picture as the Pacific seems to be in the background. The use of a Jowett Jupiter is somewhat mind-boggling and there is a nice TR 3 to be seen also. Canada must have been cheap and it is rather gratuitously used a lot in the background.

As far as the actual narrative of the film there is little to recommend it other than the mystery of just who Ellen Parker is giving the finger to at the end of the picture. And she most definitely is flipping someone off. Could it be, R as in Robert Loggia? The director who dies before this film was released? Her career as this was her last credit?

Its like the newspaper the gift came wrapped in was more valuable than the gift.
13 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
There's this missile you see...and it's lost...umm...
Vigilante-4078 March 1999
The Lost Missile is an interesting little film. It is fast-paced, as all the action occurs in a simaculum of real time (at least as real as an hour and a half could feel back in the fifties). It tries for a documentary-feel...but since there is a story going on with characters, it doesn't quite make it.

For all this rapid development, the movie is somewhat dull when viewed nowadays, falling prey to "stock footage syndrome". There is innumerable shots of bombers and fighters taking off...I think more time is devoted to that than dialogue.

The plot is simple...an unknown missle enters the Earth's atmosphere and glides into an orbit 5 miles above the planet, which would normally be fine, but the missile has a field of million degree heat emanating from it, carving a five-mile wide swath of destruction on the ground below whereever it goes. It destroys part of Canada (including Ottawa) and nearly gets New York City except for the heroic sacrifice of Robert Loggia.

With the rapid developments, no effort is made to determine the source of the missile (and probably this would not be able to be done anyway), and this movie seems to be a showcase for the effectiveness of the US early warning system for missle attacks if nothing else (though any defense effort is pretty much pointless against this menace).

Loggia is stoic in his role, displaying feats of emotion that defy his character depth. Still, it's interesting to see him act as a young man, having seen him so often in more mature roles.

The special effects are actually pretty good. The missile, though interestingly designed, does appear like something off an episode of Space Patrol. The blending of the missile's fiery effects with the stock footage and city footage is accomplished fairly believably.
21 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Not that bad, but it sinks due to an overuse of stock footage AND poor special effects--even for a 1950s sci-fi film.
planktonrules13 April 2009
Warning: Spoilers
The story idea behind THE LOST MISSILE isn't bad at all, but unfortunately the story does get a bit dull towards the middle and the overuse of stock footage as well as poor special effects sink this film to the sub-par level.

The film begins with a missile heading towards the Earth. In a panic because it's about to strike the Earth, the Soviets manage to deflect the object. This isn't necessarily good, however, as this seemingly unmanned craft has a vapor trail that destroys everything in its path AND the ship is now in a low orbit over the planet. In other words, with each pass it makes, a swath of death follows--one that could potentially kill us all!! So, it's up to the good scientists of the US (led by a very young and hardly recognizable Robert Loggia) to formulate and plan to save us--and especially save New York that is in its immediate flight path! Unfortunately, they aren't able to save Ottawa (I've never been there, so I can't say whether or not this is a big loss) but thanks to good old American know-how, they are able to eventually destroy this harbinger of destruction!!

So, as you can see, the story idea isn't bad and rather original. But, so many old clips of fighter planes and guys manning radar scopes gets a bit old and it seemed like padding. Overall, a decent but hardly inspired film that extreme fans of the genre may like--all others, see it at your own risk.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not the greatest, but gets the job done
ScottR2164 May 2014
Warning: Spoilers
I remember seeing this a few times as a kid during those Saturday afternoon monster movie shows. I have to say that THIS one always stuck with me. Not that it's that good or well made - it's NOT - but the premise. Blazing death coming at you at 4K mph? How could you run? How could you shelter? Basically you couldn't. THAT is the brilliance of this film - it creeps you out.

Part of what sets this gem apart is that unlike most "happy happy joy joy" American films of the time, this one shows people who don't stand a chance actually dying. Kids, women, people in shelters - there's no last minute helo rescue or a sudden rainstorm that saves families cowering in alleyways... they're doomed and they stay doomed.

Well worth a watch - and compared to a LOT of films of that era, this one is actually interesting and different.

Keep an eye out: when the nervous scientist's pregnant wife is taking shelter in her bldg's basement, there's an angry bald guy complaining... every person in the room with me watching had the same reaction: "hey, that's the bald guy from the basement in Night of the Living Dead!"

One thing - you would NOT want to be standing near Robert Loggia when a lot of heat builds up. Not going to say his acting is wooden, but if you look REALLY hard, in the background is a bunch of Amish guys chasing him so they can build a barn out of him. The man's a deciduous forest worth of wood.

Of course this film would've been PRIME for Mystery Science Theater 3000... but then, every film ever made would be better getting riffed by Mike and the Bots. Perhaps Rifftrax can take care of this glaring omission!
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Nostalgic Fifties Shock Cinema
vfrickey29 November 2008
I remember watching "Lost Missile" (actually throwing a fit until my brother and several cousins at whose home I was an overnight guest agreed to watch it with me - I was, from time to time, the Eric Cartman of the 1960s - sorry, guys) and being somewhat embarrassed when the sustained wave of million-degree heat emerged as a plot device - even as a second-grader I knew that a mere missile just couldn't carry the energy around for that much heat or devastation over more than the duration and limited radius of a nuclear detonation.

My inflicting that turkey on loving relatives was a self-punishing crime.

The film's production values were very good. The acting isn't bad (apart from the Shatnerism of the actor who played a governor's aide that someone else here mentioned).

But the idea of a missile Easy-Baking the surface of the Earth by means of the heat of its exhaust... no.

How'd the people at "Mystery Science Theater 3000" miss "The Lost Missile," anyway?

It's a great classic of unintentional comedy - watch it if you want something to drink beer to some weekend.
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Haven't Seen It Since It's Release.
Magellan Grey10 July 2002
I found it a very interesting film and at the time a bit frightening. Not a dull movie at all, but I would love to see it again to see if I feel the same. I have great appreciation for science fiction and horror films of the 1950s. They show great imagination even without the hype of technological advancement. They are creative because they had to be innovative with what existed at the time. This was a cold-war era film about a missile that got locked into a deadly low earth orbit by the Germans trying to shoot it down at it initial close approach. With the speed the missile was circling the earth at, the shockwave and the frictional activity created air temperatures in excess of one million degrees.
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
sWow. One of the darkest 1950 American scifi films.
ebeckstr-120 July 2019
Almost shockingly dark, apocalyptic 1950s Cold War terror fest. Many films of this era disguised their Cold War paranoia and terror within fantasy science fiction allegories. Alternatively, The Lost Missile is almost literal in its depiction of the nuclear threat.

This dread-laden tone is supported by earnest acting, and, as other reviewers have noted, far better than average integration of stock footage with original material. The movie is also effectively paced to create greater suspense than one would expect from this kind of film, given how poorly executed so many of its counterparts were. Yes there are moments of high melodrama - it is a far from perfect movie - but narratively, and as a cultural artifact of that era, it is an entertaining and fascinating watch. I've actually decided to buy it, and think it would be a worthy addition to any aficionado's 1950s scifi film collection.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A starring vehicle for Robert Loggia
kevinolzak3 April 2019
Warning: Spoilers
1958's "The Lost Missile" remains a rarely seen United Artists release whose existence must have been conceived around its reams of military stock footage, also done for other cheapies like "Invasion USA," "Phantom from Space," "The Deadly Mantis," and "The Giant Claw." Screenwriter Jerome Bixby ("It! The Terror from Beyond Space," "Curse of the Faceless Man") shared authorship with John McPartland and thought little of the finished product, not helped by the sudden death on the first day of shooting of director William Berke (one previous genre effort, 1952's "The Jungle"), his son taking over to finish on time. A missile of unknown origin is redirected by a misfiring rocket into an orbit only five miles above the earth, traveling at a rate of 4000 miles per hour and generating scorching heat of a million degrees. No planes are able to get close enough to destroy it before disintegrating, and everything it passes over is burnt to a cinder, its course set to travel from the Arctic through Canada and then New York City, giving the residents barely an hour to evacuate. The human drama is severely undercut by the heavy reliance on stock shots, roughly one third of its scant 70 minutes, yet the novel race against time premise is enough to maintain interest (if barely). Top billing goes to Robert Loggia, going on to a lauded career lasting seven decades, his dedicated scientist able to find a solution placing a hydrogen warhead into a specially designed rocket quick enough to reach its target in the nick of time. Another recognizable face belongs to Thomas E. Jackson, veteran police detective of countless Bs such as "Mystery of the White Room" and "The Face of Marble" (he also has brief roles in two other latter entries, Roger Corman's "It Conquered the World" and "Attack of the 50 Foot Woman"). Hari Rhodes ("Conquest of the Planet of the Apes") has a silent bit as a piano player, and the dark haired little girl in the underground bunker is Gina Gillespie, later to play the young Blanche Hudson in "What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?" (and in a memorable THRILLER hosted by Boris Karloff, "Mr. George").
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
atomic doom - from space yet!
march9hare1 April 2004
Released (some would say "escaped") in 1958, "The Lost Missile" is, de- spite it's many flaws and shortcomings, a fairly interesting tale about a wild missile, apparently of extraterrestrial origin, loose in the Earth's atmosphere and frying everything underneath it with a million-degree exhaust. The biggest problem with this film really isn't the film's fault: it suffers from being rather too ambitious for its budget. While this is true of many fifties sci-fi films, this is not to say that there are other flaws which cannot be so easily dismissed' to wit: the acting. Robert Loggia plays Dr. David Loring, the tragic hero, and turns in a performance that is played with such lethargy and apparent disinterest that it makes you wonder if he was wondering "what was I thinking?" The rest of the cast play their parts like second- or even third-string summer stock. Oh, yeah: there's also the cliche'd frazzeled scientist ("My wife's having a baby, and I can't be with her!!"), lots and lots of stock Dept. of Defense shots of scrambling fighters, and some surprisingly good effects rendered by then-Master

of the Art Jack Glass. By far, the most hilarious performance is rendered by the Governor's aide. This guy looks like he just found out that his wife is cheating, his single daughter is pregnant, his son has the clap, he has prostate cancer, the car needs a new tranny, and the bank is foreclosing on his mortgage. . .all at the same time!!! Coming in a close second is the TV singer. This guy couldn't carry a tune in a semi! Seriously though, while "The Lost Missile" may not be a great film, it isn't quite a bad one, either. It's fast-paced and does hold your interest, which is more than I can say for "Phantom From Space". That one.. .OY!!
18 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A time-line even Jack Bauer couldn't keep
tangent-cc1 April 2009
Warning: Spoilers
This had all the makings of a very good film -- good actors (Robert Loggia, Ellen Parker), a good plot (mysterious missile from space threatens to burn up the planet) and lots of stock footage (if the Air Force had film of jets firing rockets, it was used). Unfortunately, it is ruined by too much melodrama and an impossible time-line.

The movie concerns a missile from space that is attacked by the Soviets and inadvertently diverted into a low atmospheric orbit. At under five miles and at a speed in excess of 4,000 miles, it emits an exhaust of a million degrees, burning up everything on the ground, including glaciers, Distant Early Warning (DEW) line bases and Eskimos.

Every attempt at destroying the missile fails.

The first flaws in this film appear early on. While we don't expect much from low-budget films, some things can't be forgotten -- like a little research. For instance, both the Soviets and the US fire anti-ballistic missiles that home in on the missile with unerring accuracy. However, the first successful ABM tests weren't done until March of 1961 by the Russians.

There is too much melodrama. Dr. Loring (Loggia) and his assistant Joan Woods (Ellen Parker) play their romance with about as much wood as a log cabin. Parker's character cries and boo-hoos at Loggia's sacrifice like she was at a screen test. Loggia is about as heroic as a bored businessman. A scientist (Phillip Pine) hams it up so much he makes William Shatner look like a thespian. A bus driver continually spits out end-of-the-world crap in scene after scene. The only good actor is the film narrator, played by veteran character actor Lawrence Dobkins ("Naked City").

All of this could be overlooked if it wasn't for the time-line. After the missile's info is sent to DC, the Pentagon brings in a group of scientists. A general (Larry Kerr) announces that the missile will hit New York City in 63 minutes. After this, there are discussions by scientists and there is a deadly lull as word is sought from ambassadors to see if the missile is an attack from the Russians and if a response is necessary.

The film shows the military being fully scrambled. Civil Defense people leave work and go to their stations. Eight million people scramble to fallout shelters while school buses pick up millions of kids (and we get to see the whitest New York City I've ever seen, though watching 50's sci-fi films made it seems like this was the standard). The press is kept in the dark for tens of minutes. Then, incredibly, a man at the Pentagon announces that the missile will hit Ottawa, Canada in 51 minutes! All of the aforementioned action happened in 12 minutes! Then, to add fuel to the fire, Loggia somehow thinks of a way to stop the alien missile. He slowly produces a caseload of plutonium, loads it in a jeep and takes it from DC to a distant missile base to put it atop a missile. Along the way, he is knocked off the road by a wild driver, breaks down and then is carjacked. He finally gets the plutonium back and drives to the base to arm the missile. Again, all this in the same 63-minute time frame.

The movie also irks the viewer by making it seem as if Ottawa might be saved, only to show men, women and children get roasted. The missile is then said to have five minutes to reach New York. Loggia is still driving to the base (4 more miles to go). He gets to the base and arms the missile, a two-minute countdown is then announced. All within five minutes. The boroughs of New York should have been at least scorched.

By the way, the missile is destroyed if you haven't guessed. The ABM warhead destroys it with a massive plutonium-based nuclear blast. Five seconds later, the blast dissipates and all is clear. Yeah, they caused a nuclear blast equivalent to 100 Hiroshimas on the outskirts of New York City and nothing happens.

The film had all the elements necessary to be a good B film, but wasted them. Loggia played his character so lamely you didn't care that he sacrificed himself in the end. You didn't care about the other characters, not even the smarmy scientist played by Pine. The tension that should have moved the film along just wasn't physically possible in the time-line allowed (it still wouldn't be today, not even with Jack Bauer).

This film is very difficult to find. As far as I know, it hasn't been re-issued on any medium and for good reason. I don't know if the film meant to be or if it was standard practice, but there's a scene where the government sends all of the best scientists, military men and businessmen into deep shelters, saying they're too valuable to lose. There isn't a single woman or minority in the bunch. Hari Rhodes is the only black man in the film and he gets a brief bit playing a piano. It was worse than "27 Days" where an alien gives five Earthlings the chance to either save or destroy the planet and he doesn't include any blacks or Hispanics.

I saw this on a special Sci-fi night on Turner Classic Movies and I don't expect it to show up again. If you do find a copy of this somewhere, you might want to put it up on Amazon.com.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Isis would love to get a hold of one of these
bkoganbing21 September 2014
We never do find out who sent The Lost Missile if it was aliens or some earth power who was utterly mad. Boy would Isis like to get a hold of one of these.

This missile looks like one of your rocketship from some old science fiction movie, only it emanates heat of a million degrees as it passes over the earth destroying all in its path. Imagine an snow covered tundra region burned to a crisp as it passes over. That's what this thing does. No one to contact and reason with about The Lost Missile, humankind must bring whatever scientific knowledge to bear to destroy this thing. It takes out Ottawa in Canada and is heading for New York.

A bigger budget with some nice production values and this could have been a science fiction classic. As it is the best parts are the vignettes of ordinary people trying to cope with a sudden impending catastrophe.

The Lost Missile is worth a look only to see how much it could have been improved.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not bad
Leofwine_draca22 March 2019
Warning: Spoilers
THE LOST MISSILE feels a bit like a Hollywood disaster movie along the lines of DEEP IMPACT albeit with a tiny budget and a dated '50s style. A youthful Robert Loggia is the scientist hero who must intervene when America is threatened by the titular out-of-control object. Cheesy effects abound here, along with a lot of talk and the usual scenarios in which people try to survive impending doom and peril. It's a little sluggish to be all that entertaining, but it's not bad.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Great little movie...60 years ago.
ozmaozoz23 August 2019
Great little movie...60 years ago. The duck and cover era. A low budge movie that deserves praise in movie making. Mistakes many, but worthy.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Classic? Underrated? Good Sci-fi??
thestarkfist9 August 2017
Warning: Spoilers
What movie did you guys watch? Quick rule of thumb, if the movie starts out with a deadly serious-voiced narrator and he continues to appear throughout the flick in order to tell the audience what's going on because there's no way in hell that they'd be able to follow it without him....you're not watching a classic, unless what you're talking about is a classic piece of crap! Another clue that a movie is a big waste of time and money is if it requires tons of stock footage just to drag the time out so it can qualify as a feature length presentation. The only padding trick this pile of dreck lacks is a visit to a nightclub where an attractive lady eats up another 5 minutes belting out a peppy show tune. Dreadfully under-budgeted and saddled with lackluster direction, the movie features brief clips of some poorly conceived and executed "special" effects sandwiched between long, drawn-out episodes of "drama" that would have been laughably bad on a daytime soap opera. The acting comes in two flavors: deadpan and overblown. Maybe the reason that all the sci-fi geeks like this flick is because it features an appearance of that beloved science fiction stereotype; the scientist that wants the deaths to continue in the vain hope that they can communicate with the alien menace!! What fun! Near as I can figure the moral of this movie is that all the selfish women out there should stop bitching that their scientist husbands and boyfriends are too busy working 7 days a week building lots of nukes to be by their side for the birth of their child or marry them! C'mon ladies! The ending is unintentionally hilarious as our scientist hero drives a rod of deadly plutonium through the panicked streets of New York City in order to deliver it in time to their new super duper Job rocket, the only rocket able to get close enough to the alien missle to blow it up. One would get the impression that the transportation of dangerous radioactive material through am major metropolitan area is routine. Believe me, it's not. It has never been allowed, ever. Now, mind you, they have already established that helicopters are transporting all the eggheads out of NYC in order to protect their brilliant skulls, but nobody thinks to fly the plutonium to its destination. Ludicrous. So, wouldn't you know that while our hero speeds along the highway with his deadly cargo he runs smack dab into that other beloved stereotype of 50's movies; the gang of hot rod delinquents, complete with greased back hair and switch blade knives. The gang steals the jeep and the box containing the deadly rod. When the hero catches up with the jeep the box is open and the gang has vanished. Exposing himself to lethal doses of radiation our hero drives to his destination and manages to arm the Job just before he gives up the ghost. I was wishing that everybody involved with this bore-fest could have been stuffed into the jeep with him! Avoid this one unless you need a cure for insomnia.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Missile from Hell
richardchatten14 September 2017
It's not exactly 'The War Game', but 'The Lost Missile' probably put the wind up anyone who saw it in 1958. It begins with an acknowledgement of assistance from the Departments of Defence and the Army, Navy and Air Force, which means that the sometimes disturbing things the film shows received official blessing; and its copious use of stock footage throughout often make it feel like a public awareness film constructed around a fictitious plot.

It's a real curate's egg of a film, lurching abruptly from the clumsy to the highly effective on a scene by scene (and even shot by shot) basis. The actuality footage is frequently fascinating and skilfully edited (with added weight lent by Gerald Fried's stentorian piano score), although the shots of the missile itself look like a drawing. The dialogue is occasionally quite pointed and there is a surprisingly large cast of speaking parts, the quality of whose acting is as variable as the rest of the film. When the scenes involving hero Robert Loggia themselves finally leave the confines of the studio, his final outdoor scenes gain considerably in punch.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Counting down to the last minute before a hydrogen war.
mark.waltz22 February 2016
Warning: Spoilers
This cheaply made science fiction disaster film is so low budget that it goes from poverty row reputation to blue light special. Mostly indoor scenery with cheaply filmed shots of possible animated rockets represent an alien attack. Obvious stock footage looks like a bad newsreel or school made documentary. Few efforts to make this a human drama where a scientist's fiancé breaks up with him because she thinks that he values science more than her, while a pregnant wife of an army officer struggles to get in touch with her husband. But in spite of how badly made this is, there is something moderately endearing about it, made with such innocence that you can't totally hate it.

How many future film makers must have seen this as kids and been inspired to make better versions of the same story could be interview questions because elements of plot do developments of this are used in every disaster film that I've seen over the past 20 years. Some scenes are pretty shocking, literally as one panic stricken character finds while trying to escape down a New York City subway track. Acting is mostly amateurish and the pacing at times is painfully lethargic. This doesn't seem like a theatrical film, but obviously got some big screen release even though it probably looked ten times poorer than it does on television. Narration makes me call this Plan Six from Outer Space.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Drumbeat of Dread
LeonLouisRicci25 December 2012
Undeniably tense and frightening, an extremely low budget film that is a clever combination of fantastic Air Force and Civil Defense stock footage with effective, chilling special effects. This is quite an achievement of creativity overcoming limited resources.

The movie is a sleeper. It is underrated and ignored. But you could bill this with Dr. Strangelove (1964), and Fail-Safe (1964), and screened with the right attitude it would fit in quite nicely as an example of a Primitive Art entry in the Doomsday genre.

This is a heart pounding picture that pulsates with despair and a drumbeat of dread that is missing from most of it's fun and fanciful 1950's Sci-Fi/Horror cousins. This is a dead serious scenario that is creepy and its pseudo-documentary style will have you diving under your desk as the radiated missile makes it's way around the Earth destroying everything in its path.

There is also an enormous amount of some rarely seen stock footage that has got to be of interest for military history buffs. It lends an eerie atmosphere of atomic paranoia that persisted in the early days of the cold war that dissipated somewhat after the Cuban Missile Crisis.

On a lighter note. There is ONE scene that cannot be forgiven and is a minor flaw in this otherwise attention to detail scare-fest. It cannot be imagined that a Woman would go into labor and give childbirth without her or someone else removing her earrings.

Maybe this was left in to give this otherwise incredibly intense movie some levity in a wink, wink, nod, nod kind of way that says this is just fiction. Let's give these filmmakers the benefit of the doubt. They deserve it for this fine effort.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Better production value than many of its type
Bowserb4627 February 2021
I almost gave this a 7. Call it 6.5 for me anyway. A lot of action shots mixed with a whole lot of stock footage, including some things you almost never saw and now they're obsolete. Aircraft I could I.D.: P-80, F-86, F-100, maybe an FJ2/3, B-36, B-47, B-52. Missile: A Nike Ajax launcher with 4 or 5 missiles. A Nike Hercules (just briefly...I could be wrong about this one. And the old standby, a captured German V-2 or derivative. Aside from that a lot of far more detailed and believable technical stuff than the usual panels with lights and gauges.

Yes, the premise of the movie is its weak point. But aside from that? Not bad, and available on Amazon Prime. Kudos to Amazon for bringing back a lot of these old scifi "classics." And Robert Loggia went on to a pretty decent career.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
How Roadside Hoodlums Endangered The World
davidcarniglia11 June 2019
Warning: Spoilers
An orbiting missile leaves a path of destruction. We have only so much time before New York City is wiped out. On our side we've got Drs. David Loring and Joe Freed (Robert Loggia and Phillip Pine), Joan Wood (Ellen Parker), General Barr (Larry Kerr), and Ella Freed (Marilee Earle).

But there's another problem: we're on the verge of a nuclear war with the Soviet Union. Probably because they think the missile is ours. Anyway, their attack missile diverts the alien missile into the ominous five mile orbit, leading back to the first problem. To deal with it "the big brass from the Pentagon is here now" say our scientist boys and girl.

The Soviets determine that the missile wasn't ours offer all, so we're spared nuclear winter. I've already have enough of the narrator, he's introduced their guys, out guys, even the buildings. It's our turn for an attack, this time an air-to-air strike. Time out for an update from the actual cast: at the 'lab' the engaged couple David and Joan are arguing about "marrying a hydrogen warhead". Back to stock footage action, RCAF F-86s and Meteors sortie to intercept the missile.

Then we get introduced to the Joint Chiefs of Staff, while Dave ponders the warhead v. wife dilemma "It's the job, it gets all of us," offers Joe. Well, Joe's wife is about to give birth--so pick out a name and get on with stock footage or something. Phone calls between Ella and Joe, and Joe and the JCS. She's actually upset when he has to sign off to get back to his job, which concerns, possibly, the future of planet Earth.

Never have I wanted so much to be in a meeting of bureaucrats. But I don't get why they're talking about war. If the Soviets are smart enough to figure out the mystery missile isn't ours; don't we also know it isn't theirs either? "I said no comment!" Says the Secretary of Defense. So, by now, all of the nuclear powers have denied knowledge of the UFO. Why are we deciding what to do when the missile's already been attacked twice (three times counting the Soviet attack)? Somebody authorized those strikes. Preparation as though for war. We're :30 minutes in, and almost nothing has happened since the first attack. Aha! Dave has an idea that a 'baby warhead' can get through the UFO's heat shield and destroy it. Meanwhile, the RCAF jets are incinerated.

Things on the ground supposedly blow up in the UFO's path, but there doesn't seem to be any noticeable interaction between the UFO and earth. More cool stock footage: F-80s and 86s take off from a base, Crusaders from a carrier. "This is situation red!" People are supposed to fill pots and pans with water. If they're going to evacuate, why bother? Now the governor says that there's no danger of war--the UFO is the loose-cannon. If it's not enough to have the narrator interfere, we also hear local authorities tell us everything else from speakers.

I'm just going to accept the fact that this movie inaugurated a new genre: the fictional documentary. The subway shelter scenes are actually not bad; the birth of Ella's baby is going on. There's some tension as Joe has succumbed to that delusion common in this sort of movie--it's not just a missile, it's a spacecraft...so, 'we can learn so much from the aliens' kind of thing. Dave is steadier, more rational, only "a nation of homicidal maniacs" could've sent the ship. We attack again.

No dice, but more cool planes. That, apparently, was Phase I. "Phase II negative" as well. What's the point of the guy in the sports car speeding around? Another explosion on the ground that bears no relation to anything above, but we're supposed to buy that the UFO/spacecraft caused it. Also the Canadians in the countryside seem to be completely oblivious to the danger. Meanwhile, Dave and Joan are heading to the missile base with the baby weapon; completely absurdly, they get hijacked by some leather-jacketed hoods.

Somewhat conveniently, the hoods quickly die from 'plutonium radiation.' Well, Dave must've known that little side-effect from the time the baby bomb deal was constructed. And with that in mind, wouldn't the military have provided some safer and quicker transport arrangements? Are we really supposed to buy that the immediate fate of New York City, and ultimately, of the entire world, is subject to the whims of a couple of James Dean wannabes? All of this stuff could only make sense if David we're some off-the-grid beatnik savant/scientist, who, at the last minute, because nothing else worked, was allowed to participate. As it is, David is running around most of the latter part of the movie as though he is a sort of beatnik nutcase.

The baby missile deal works so well that there's a (stock footage naturally) gigantic nuclear blast. From just five miles up, the blast could conceivably destroy New York City anyway, and possibly kill everyone with radiation. Well, no stock footage of that. So we just end with (stock footage) of everyday N.Y.C. street scenes. Not even need of Ella's baby or the David/Joan wedding plans.

Man, this was a bad movie. I'm only disparaging the domestic subplots because the characters are so two-dimensional that they're very hard to identify or empathize with. When romances, families, and ordinary, peaceful life is presented in an authentic way it can help the plot. After all, that's why we fight (UFOs or what have you): to keep our way of life intact. But in The Lost Missile the domestic subplots actually conflict with the UFO plot.

David, Joan, Joe, and Ella never come across as individuals with personalities worth rooting for. They seem to resist blending into the main plot; this would only makes sense if they were outsiders, as I hinted in my beatnik/scientist alternative role for David. I criticize some sci-fi movies of this era for focusing too much on a small group of locals, and neglecting a broader perspective that would help plot believability. But in this movie there really isn't a focus.

The stock footage, ironically, is by far the best stuff in the movie. I would've liked The Lost Missile a lot more if it were nothing but stock footage (and, fine, a narrator to tie things together). That sounds crazy, and it is. That's because this movie was so disjointed: in tone, pacing, and acting, that it never really seems to take off, so to speak.

Only recommended for Cold-War era military aircraft enthusiasts. Otherwise, The Lost Missile blew up on the launch pad.. 3/10.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed