Quacker Tracker (1967) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
By this point, they were mostly going through the motions.
llltdesq16 August 2003
This cartoon is nothing special-routine and average at best. Not too bad for the period, but that's not saying much. By 1967, it was fairly obvious that the only thing expected from the animation department was the production of enough material to fulfill contractual obligations. Speedy is a high point and although Daffy still isn't a natural foil for Speedy, they actually have a logical reason for him to be chasing "the fastest mouse in all Mexico" for a change. Mediocre backgrounds and lame, canned music didn't help. For absolute completeists and Speedy fans.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not that great to be honest
TheLittleSongbird8 May 2010
Now Quacker Tracker had its moments, but personally I don't think it is that good. Some of the gags and dialogue are funny, and Speedy and Daffy are fine. As are the stellar vocal characterisations of Mel Blanc. So what let it down? Well the animation wasn't that great, not the characters as such but more the backgrounds. They lack vibrancy, and as a result are one of the poorer looking Looney Tunes cartoons. Then there is a routine and predictable story, uneven pacing and the music wasn't that great either being poorly timed and the fact it was canned didn't help either. Overall, had its moments but it wasn't that great. 5/10 Bethany Cox
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed