Money Train (1995) Poster

(1995)

User Reviews

Review this title
81 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Snipes and Harrelson Redux.
nycritic12 June 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Popcorn is the word that most describes this action-comedy movie from Joseph Reuben, the man who directed other standard fare like SLEEPING WITH THE ENEMY, TRUE BELIEVER, THE STEPFATHER, DREAMSCAPE, and most recently, a notorious bomb called THE FORGOTTEN.

So let's see how I can dive into this pool without hitting a hard surface. This is a "buddy-movie" in which two uber-American guys of very different temperaments and backgrounds share a bond that goes beyond anything they might go through. One of the two is by default a loose cannon and drives the plot with his antics. There may be some tension when a corrupt high official threatens the loose cannon. Add a sexy new co-worker into the mix (which becomes the focus of their intense, male attraction) and basically you have a story that has been of late the norm in the Hollywood popcorn machine.

Now, trying to cash in (I believe, I could be wrong) on their previous outing WHITE MEN CAN'T JUMP, Woody Harrelson and Wesley Snipes play not buddies from the 'hood but foster 'brothas' (if we can believe this baby) who are closer than a cuticle is to a finger even though Snipes has to act as older brother to a rebellious and unpredictable Harrelson: and on that note, neither is miscast. Snipes does convey steel while Harrelson gives off his just-under-the-surface danger, especially when he grins at smarmy boss Robert Blake in one subway scene.

Pitching in for the Latina female is Jennifer Lopez who, without being as angry and nasal and in-your-face as Rosie Perez, actually manages to be engaging though this is early in her career, before she decided to punch out and play her (bland) self once she became the trademark known as J. Lo. She all but steals her own pat scenes, especially in one tense exchange she has with Chris Cooper playing a not-so-nice fellow who pushes people onto subway platforms, a reality among New York strap-hangers.

But trying to over-analyze this film in terms of shots and composition and visual technicality would be like trying to compare one grain of popcorn to the next: there would be no difference, no relevance in taste, texture, and all that is left to do is munch down. That the action scenes on the subway platforms (for anyone who is actually acquainted with riding the subways in New York City) are as implausible as ever and only convey the type of hyper-masculinized action that makes superheroes of its actors, but who really cares? It's fluff, entertaining, mindless, inane, and that's just what people going to see this type of film expect.
33 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Quality cast make the most of a plot that is beneath them
bh_tafe327 June 2014
Action is an interesting film genre. You go in expecting little and are pleasantly surprised if you get more. Films like Face/Off, Die Hard, Speed, Under Siege, while formulaic, were all able to offer the viewer more than they expected going in and so have become beloved classics of the genre. The Money Train tries to be more than a lot of the action films that came out and simply disappeared in the early 90s, but falls a little short. While the film certainly isn't bad, it isn't considered a classic of the genre, and, while not a financial failure, relatively few people saw it and even fewer remember it.

The film reunites the stars of White Men Can't Jump, Woody Harrelson and Wesley Snipes as a pair of law enforcement officers John (Snipes) and Charlie (Harrelson) who basically decide to steal from their boss (Robert Blake) who is a real piece of work. John has a hot girlfriend Grace (a pre Selena Jennifer Lopez) and Charlie has a gambling problem. Sound familiar? There are some funny moments and the dramatic scenes between Snipes and Harrelson are excellent. But aside from these, there really aren't any memorable moments. While the pairing of Snipes and Harrelson isn't tired, it doesn't have the same impact it had on their previous outing. Blake is menacing and odious but his character is not a believable or effective villain. Chris Cooper, who has a smaller role in this as Torch, would have been a better antagonist.

Money Train is OK and a reasonably entertaining way to spend a couple of hours, but it is also a missed opportunity. Snipes, Lopez, Harrelson and Blake try hard, but the finished product is less than the sum of its parts, and that's possibly the most frustrating thing of all.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An enjoyable time-passer
bellino-angelo201415 July 2019
I am not a huge fan of thrillers, but once in a while there are some that surprise me. I just prefer thrillers that aren't that violent or gory and I had low expectations for ''Money Train''. Thankfully, I was wrong. While the movie is far from a must-see, it was an ok and enjoyable time-passer.

The leads (played by Woody Harrelson and Wesley Snipes) are two foster brothers that work as transit cops. While Snipes' character has a good life, Harrelson's life is a mess. Then, as a sort of personal revenge, he decides to steal the money train (that carries the New York subway's workers' salaries). But when something goes wrong will his brother save him? See the film.

The bottom line is that the movie is fun. Along with the two leads also Jennifer Lopez (in one of her first movies and one of her best) and veteran Robert Blake (few years before he retired) give nice support. The actors' performances are ok and the story is not great, but decent.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What's with all the bad reviews?
stevewest-117 March 2002
Reading the reviews below this seems to be a love-it-or-hate-it kind of film. Regardless of whether you 'get' the story and the rapport between Harrelson and Snipes, you can't overlook that this is a well made film.

I've only seen it twice, once when it first came out on video, and again in the past week. I didn't think it was that remarkable when it first came out, but when I watched it the second time around, I found it highly entertaining and well executed. Granted, it's not the best film ever but I don't think it's deserving of a lot of the bad reviews given here.

As a film it succeeds, and if you've never seen it before, it's worth checking out.
55 out of 73 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fun
TheMan30514 October 2002
The movie doesn't have much of a plot but it's still a pretty entertaining movie. Which features great performances from the cast. It's nice for a Saturday night at the movies.

3(***)out of 4(****)stars
18 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Simple entertainment
rbverhoef18 February 2005
Don't think, just watch. Woody Harrelson and Wesley Snipes once again are, after 'White Men Can't Jump', a pretty funny team. Don't care for the plot, just see these two actors having a lot of fun with their characters and the situations they find themselves in.

Here they play two brothers, sort of. They are both cops, operating in and around a metro station. A criminal nick-named Torch (Chris Cooper), you can imagine what his crime is, is the villain they are trying to catch. There are also problems with Donald Patterson (Robert Blake), the man who controls the tracks. He puts his "money train" above everything, so when Charlie (Harrelson) and John (Snipes) delay that train with their police work, he gets mad. Another thing about money: Charlie is a bad gambler and owns a man named Mr. Brown (Scott Sowers) a lot of it. Jennifer Lopez, she plays Officer Grace Santiago, is the love interest for one of the two leads, of course leading to friction between them.

The film is called 'Money Train' so you understand the main story has to do with that train. I liked that story. The other stories seem to be there for Harrelson or Snipes and the fun they can have with them. The Lopez-character is necessary to explain certain actions that follow, the Cooper-character provides the film with some extra action-sequences. I didn't mind those things. They make sure the film delivers what it promises us. Action and comedy. Every scene between Snipes and Harrelson makes you smile. As a team they come close to Owen Wilson with anybody (Ben Stiller, Jackie Chan). If you don't expect too much there is a very good chance you will enjoy 'Money Train'.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Pointless plot and badly developed characters
The-Sarkologist15 October 2013
Warning: Spoilers
After watching this movie I had one question, what was the point? The plot existed but was so thin that they had top fill it up with boring relationship scenes which served no purpose to the movie and a psycho-pyromaniac who gets his thrills from pushing people in the front of trains and burning women in ticket booths.

The thin plot is that there are two brothers (whose names I can't remember) and there is the running joke that one is white and one is black, but the joke isn't funny. The white one has incurred a huge gambling debt and needs the money. They work as transit police who seem to have nothing better to do than to set up muggers in subway stations. Personally, I find it quite stupid because I don't think any police force has the resources to pretend to be drunks hoping to catch purse snatchers, and even then there is no point because the penalty is not that high.

There is a train which carries all of the revenue from the ticket sales and it is dubbed the money train. This train has priority over all other trains and the controller, Paterson, is quite a mean little rat. The white guy, who owes lots of money, decides that he will steal the money train, and he does so. This is pretty silly because there was only one guard on the train with around three million dollars on it. Honestly, this movie was pretty poor and the struggle of actually building a plot is shown with the existence of a mad man. Personally, don't bother.
12 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The train is coming......
FlashCallahan2 March 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Two foster brothers work as transit cops. While one's life is as good as it gets, the other's is at an all time low.

After losing his job, getting dumped by his brother, and getting seven bells kicked out of him by a loan shark, He implements his plan to steal the titular train.

A train carrying the New York Subway's weekly revenue. But when things don't go according to plan, will his brother be able to save him in time....

It was inevitable that after the success of White Men can't Jump and Bad Boys, that Hollywood re-team this pair because of the chemistry they had in that 1992 comedy.

Make them cops, and you have a sure fire hit on your hands..Well you would if the main focus was on the killer The Torch, played wonderfully by Chris Cooper, rather than Harrelson trying to steal because he's gambled his life away.

And this is why the film doesn't work. Harrelson is supposed to come across as a lovable rogue, but he's just a hindrance to everyone and everything, and he comes across as a complete moron.

Snipes is the voice of reason, and is the reason to watch this film. He's on top form here, acting wise and action wise, and elevates the film whenever he's on screen.

The film has a very nasty racist streak down it, in the form of Robert Blake's abhorrent pantomime villain. The only thing that's missing from his outfit is a white hood, the script is so blunt with it's casual racism, it ruins the flow of the film.

The ending borrows from Speed, and although it's set at Christmas, it's about as festive as the hangover after new year's day.

But it's not boring, Lopez makes a good supporting character, and the afterthought of The Torch sub-plot is the most interesting part of the film.

If this was the primary part of the narrative, it could have been quite a good comedy thriller.

Instead, the film wants you to root for a gambling loser who thinks that the world owes him something.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Well, not really very good, but watchable
jmorrison-218 July 2005
Not really a very good movie. Much of the plot is unbelievable and implausible.

However, I do find that I enjoy watching this from time to time. I seem to enjoy just about anything with Wesley Snipes. I believe he is very underrated. His easygoing, but dedicated cop in this works for me. He works hard, is smart, and seems to be someone you can rely on. He cares deeply for the "brother" who grew up in his house, but he is frustrated in constantly having to bail him out of trouble.

I suppose Woody Harrelson's character is probably the worst thing about this for me. His character is seriously annoying, and it would be hard to believe him surviving as a police officer, with all his personal problems. It's okay to suspend disbelief, but a movie like this should at least have an air of plausibility.

Robert Blake's subway manager is quite a bit over-the-top, but provides a real antagonism for the buddy/brother cops, and establishes himself as the real villain for the plot.

The plan, and the execution of the robbery, (and Snipes character going along with something like this), REALLY stretches plausibility, but there is an easy camaraderie between the 2 actors, and the action is good.

It ain't all that good, but it isn't unwatchable.
18 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The best j-lo
Brooklyn-Boy27 May 2005
The movie itself is kind of good.

It has funny scenes and stuff but the movie itself it's no too good, it could be better, it could have more scene actions, it could be a better plot.. anyway some details that could do it better.

But it was one of the first movie when we could see that Hispanic beauty named Jennifer Lopez AKA J-Lo.

When i saw this movie and i saw her i had the feeling she was going to be something great, and it's because since that moment she looked so damn beautiful and so sexy that i thought she was going to be something big.

And in that film she looked even better than never, with that beauty and that sex appeal Ms Lopez have.

So this movie is recommended for all Ms Lopez' beauty lovers.
10 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
What a huge waste of time
Tanu Tuva10 July 2016
This is the kind of movie that makes you regret watching it, but holds on to you with the false promise that something worthwhile is going to happen eventually.

It was advertised as a heist movie. The heist takes place in the last 30 minutes. Prior to that, there is less than 5 minutes of discussion about the heist, and a lot of nothing about no less than four yawn-inducing subplots. The girl, the bad boss, the mob that wants to collect a debt, and the mugger they chase, and chase. With all the time wasted on those tangents there is very nearly nothing in the way of story development for what is supposed to be the main plot.

Granted the main characters need a motive and the mob provides it, but it shouldn't take literally two-thirds of the movie to establish a motive.

The insidious thing about it is that, when you have to wait so long for the plot to start, you have an incentive to sit through the long prelude only to be disappointed by the most ridiculous, and simply lame, heist in memory.

Skip this garbage. It's the product of some Hollywood hacks with no brains at all who don't have the sense to know when to send a script back for a re-write.
12 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Underrated and under appreciated action comedy! Verdict 9.5
UniqueParticle17 June 2019
So glad I bought this buddy money pot of a buddy cop film! Starring the delightful Woody Harrelson and Wesley Snipes in a fun banter extravaganza and heist awesomeness! This definitely has its flaws but the pros outweigh everything. Chris Cooper is a great villain and Joseph Ruben directed a nice ballbusting experience! Also Donald Robertson (Robert Blake) was great as the jerk boss cop.
23 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
This Film Had Everything
whpratt122 April 2006
Enjoyed this film because of its location in NYC and the fact that transit cops were depicted. If you have to travel on the Transit System in NYC you will enjoyed this film even more, because it mentions all kinds of Subway Stops, and there is plenty of action down below. Wesley Snipes,(John),"7 Seconds",'05, plays a real cool cop who has become very close friends with his co-worker, Woody Harrelson,(Charlie),"North Country",'05 and manages to steal Charlie's girl friend, Jennifer Lopez,(Grace Santiago),"Monster-in-Law",'05. Grace and John burn up the bed sheets with hot torrid love scenes. Robert Blake,(Donald Patterson),"Lost Highway",'97, plays a great jerk who is in charge of a train, called the Money Train. Great acting, lots of comedy and more than plenty of action. Enjoy
7 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Very Average but still good .
shadowman12327 February 2006
Money Train is one of those films that is NOT A MUST SEE , but it is worth a check out if it is on the TV or if you got nothing better to do on your Friday night then its worth a rent . In my opinion I found it a lot more enjoyable then White Men Can't Jump , its sort of like a down graded high speed version of Oceans 11 . The chemistry between Snipes and Harrelson is spot on and it works well for a third time . There is not much of a plot to the film just an average screw your average ass-hole boss movie which I like at this point and time because it reminds me of the relationship I have with my boss not to mention the slight money problems I'm having . Jennifer Lopez just bobs up now and then but in this case her screen presence is welcoming . I don't want to be fussy and pick out several little pieces and analyse them , this film was a simple time killing pop-corn movie that should viewed when you don't feel like watching something heavy or you'd rather check this out rather than Santa's Slay .

MONEY TRAIN - 5.6 OUT 10 - THATS WHAT WE LIVE WITH .
14 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
That's what we live with!
Mr Parker21 August 2002
Personally speaking, I don't quite know what to make of this picture. I saw it again on late night cable the other night and I was laughing hysterically throughout. Wesley and Woody play two brothers (!) who work as transit cops. Woody's a gambling junkie with a huge debt on his back while Wesley plays the straight man who's getting a little tired of constantly having to bail his brother out. Desperate, Woody plans to hijack the Money Train that rides along to each station, collecting the night's collections. Folks, believe me when I tell you that it actually gets more ridiculous. Add to the mix a pyromaniac token booth bandit, a pre-lobotomy Jennifer Lopez, Robert Blake in a performance so hammy that you can almost smell the bacon coming from your tv, action sequences that are unabashedly ridiculous and you have yourself... Money Train. My favorite moment comes when Robert Blake, after having been informed of the possibility of civilian casualties if the hijacked Money Train continues to speed ahead on the local line, responds with the now-classic line, "That's what we live with." I was laughing so hard that tears were squirting out of my eyes. This movie is utterly ridiculous yet strangely riveting. Wesley Snipes plays his usual cocky, confident self and it seems to me that he won't accept a role these days unless he gets to kick someone in the face. Woody Harrelson looks like he smoked one too many blunts in this one. I actually prefer his character here over Wesley's and that's not saying much. Jennifer Lopez looks damn good but I can't help but think how stupid she is in real life. I really don't know where else to go with this review other than to recommend watching it. You might like it but not because it's quality stuff but because it'll cheer you up, it's so bad. Actual rating ** out of ***** but on the laugh-o-meter I'll give it a full **** out of *****.
24 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Neglectful !
elshikh416 April 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I recall reviews about this movie where one critic was so furiously saying: "This is one of the worst train movies!", and another critic shouted: "How unethical this end was!". Ok, to tell you the truth, they weren't completely wrong!

Undoubtedly, that climactic sequence looks confused move, since the train's heist is nothing but sudden third act's plot, not the whole movie, and not related to what seemed as the basic conflict, the subway's burner, which ends strangely earlier. So, with the misleading title, you have to feel disappointed or at least muddled, repining: "this is not a train movie", and it is, but you're the last to know!

And yes, some of the bosses are megalomaniac idiots, or psychos anyway, but still making the money train's manager as the story's villain wasn't that right or believable, especially with his behaviors near the end. Sure that movie needed another villain.

Speaking about the end, it wasn't as simple as what this kind of fun action movies used to present, being for many people as unethical. But it's originally a story about the relationship between 2, totally incompatible, brothers where one wins eventually love, and the other wins well.. money.. dirty money, just to assure the difference between them both as one good cop and one forever hustler, who their arguments are endless. Nevertheless, having endless argument about that "dirty money" situation in the last shot was a bit odd, and based on the above; it mirrored more disparagement from the 2 scriptwriters' side, not a serious effort to make such an unfamiliar controversial ending.

Plus, I hated the sex scene, why to degrade your actors like this? Turning humans into cheap merchandises is just woeful. And with lots and lots of profanity too, it's like not art anymore, however a degradation commerce!

(Joseph Ruben) is the man who can make attractive visual work yet mostly with not attractive scripts. He's a very good director, however surely not the best when it comes to feeling anything wrong with the writing that he deals with. So, the direction of his movies was always smarter than their scripts.. and that's a tragedy!

Save this and that, it's a fair action with fine cast. Definitely this is better than (Wesley Snipes) & (Woody Harrelson)'s last movie (White Men Can't Jump) which's not up to this one's lovely time, let alone being one of the silliest movies ever. (Harrelson) did it so well as a childish loser. (Snipes) was charismatic and performed some of the most memorable fights. Despite how (Robert Blake)'s character was badly stereotypical, and his performance was scary in the wrong place, part of me loved how he played that nasty captain as a deranged version of (Napoléon); if only that was in a serious movie! All the elements, including the cinematography, the editing, and most of all the music, was solid maybe more than the main story.

Another side of the movie's misfortune is that it came in the year of 1995 where movies by the names of (Die Hard with a Vengeance), (Bad Boys), (Assassins), (Heat), (Se7en), and (Braveheart) were produced. Tough I know. Especially with the more successful results from the box office, the critics, or both.

At any rate, it's mishmash of Hollywood stuff, and neglectful script; in terms of writing and morality. So try to enjoy the Hollywood stuff. Otherwise, you'll be so furious like those critics.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Snipes and Harrelson play brothers who steal a train (eventually)
Tweekums27 September 2016
Warning: Spoilers
John and Charlie Robinson are step brothers who work on the New York subway as transit cops. For the most part their job seems to consist of one of them acting like a drunk and waiting for low-lives to attempt to rob them then the team arresting them. During one such operation a petty thief flees through the tunnel to the nest station where the 'money train' is stopped while its crew collect the day's revenue… they shoot and kill the thief. John and Charlie are disgusted by their over-reaction but their boss, Donald Patterson, is unconcerned; he regards the money train as his and thinks any potential threat to it must be eliminated.

Charlie, who has money problems, jokes that one day they should rob the train but John is unimpressed. As well as dealing with petty thieves they are also looking for a character known as 'The Torch' who has been attempting to set fire to ticket offices and the female employees inside them. The brothers' lives seem to be going in different directions; both fancy new team member Grace Santiago but she is keener on John and Charlie is heavily indebted to some shady characters; John gives him the needed money but he is robbed before he can return it. With nowhere else to find the money Charlie's thoughts turn to the money train.

This isn't a great film but I rather enjoyed it. Wesley Snipes and Woody Harrelson have a decent chemistry as the two very different foster brothers and Jennifer Lopez is good as love interest Grace. Robert Blake is suitably unpleasant as Patterson; he makes it easy to root for the brothers when they finally decide to rob his train. The story itself of solid enough although anybody expecting lots of time to be spent on the planning and execution of the robbery will be somewhat disappointed… if the title hadn't been 'Money Train' one would think the film would be about the hunt for the Torch at least until that plot line is wrapped up after about an hour. Inevitable one needs to suspend ones disbelief quite a bit… most notably when the robbery finally takes place and all the guards leave the train, and the money that was already collected, when they collect money from a station. This doesn't matter too much as it was never meant to be particularly realistic; just fun. Overall I'd say that despite its flaws the film is fun; there are some decent laughs and some exciting moments.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
All that $$$ and they still couldn't afford a plot
CuriosityKilledShawn6 February 2016
When Money Train was first released to poor reviews and low box office in winter of 1995 it caused quite a controversy as a pointless, tasteless, and tacked-on subplot in which a weirdo lights subway cashiers on fire came true in real life. The authorities denounced the film and demanded it be banned in some form. Columbia refused to bow to their demands and bad word of mouth spread. It finally came out here in the UK in May of 1996 (essentially summer, for a Xmas/New Year- themed movie) and was slapped with an utterly ridiculous and unjustifiable 18-rating.

Wesley and Woody play brothers (don't ask) John and Charlie, apparently without last names, who are New York transit cops. Their sole duty, it would seem, is to play drunk and entrap would-be muggers on the subway platforms. Charlie is a loser and a gambler and is in debt to scary Mr. Brown (Scott Sowers, in his second train-themed action movie of that year) for $15k. John loans Charlie the money but he is soon pick- pocketed by an old woman on the train (oh, the irony). Meanwhile (kinda) Chris Cooper (looking like Bill Maher) plays Torch, a pyromaniac terrorizing the subways.

Don't expect any of these threads to kick in right away. Money Train spends AGES AND AGES AND AGES building up to...not much. Jennifer Lopez shows up as Grace Santiago a character who does...nothing. I'm not kidding, Jennifer Lopez does nothing in this film and serves absolutely zero purpose other than to have Wesley extremely unerotically hump her in a ridiculous, unnecessary, and anatomically-incorrect sex scene.

Then, after what seems like a freaking aeon, Woody finally decides to rob the money train, an apparently heavily guarded single car train filled with millions of dollars in daily subway revenue. He does this with great ease, without even breaking a sweat. None of the above plots connect. Nothing seems like part of a chronology or timeline. It's all just random, haphazard drivel.

Jennifer Lopez does nothing in this film.

Money Train really should have been a heist movie. It should have been 30 minutes of set-up and 70 minutes of action with a runaway train and ever-escalating chaos. Instead the money train is an afterthought with the majority of the movie circling emptiness and dwelling on nothing.

Jennifer Lopez does nothing in this film.

It cannot even be enjoyed on a no-brainer level as there is barely any action to speak of. The subplot of Torch goes nowhere and is forgotten about as soon as it abruptly ends. Money Train feels like an entire movie of subplots with nothing at its core. If Jennifer Lopez was eliminated from the movie it would have been tighter.

Jennifer Lopez does nothing in this film.

Where's the excitement? The only highlight in the movie is Robert Blake as the deliriously over-the-top transit boss Donald Patterson. He's the only person having fun in this drek. Mark Mancina, fresh off his breakout success with Speed, churns out a completely generic and forgettable score that never gets the chance to pick up literal speed since the movie goes nowhere. Director Joseph Ruben, the man who wrought no excitement out of misaligned bath towels in Sleeping with the Enemy or a sweary Macauley Culkin in The Good Son apparently rewrote much of Doug Richardson's script, I believe for the worse. There was a lot of potential here, but as I have said several times already this is a train that goes nowhere.

Jennifer Lopez does nothing in this film.

Is it worth watching? Sure, but there's very, very little to bring you back unless you're a train movie junkie.

Jennifer Lopez does nothing in this film.
8 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fun little buddy-cop movie, but definitely not one of the best
Rorschach1717 January 2007
The late 80s, early 90s was THE decade of buddy-cop comedy/action movies, and this is just one of those in a long line of them which graced (well more or less) our movie-screens. Every one has their favourite, from the classic Lethal Weapon series, back in the days when Mel Gibson was still sane, to the much later Bad Boys, the film that truly launched Will Smith's film career. Money Train was written by the same writer who gave the latter of those buddy-cop movies, and it really shows. You find the same kind of street-slang jokes and buddy camaraderie in both movies, but whereas the two cops in Bad Boys were childhood friends, in Money Train they are actually brothers. Well foster-brothers, which explains the fact one is black, one is white, and cue all the imaginable jokes you can think of with this type of sibling affinity. And not only are they foster-brothers, but partners in some New-York cop department which protects the Underground tube system.

Unfortunately, the chemistry between Wesley Snipes and Woody Harrelson isn't even close to that between Smith and Lawrence. They each respectively turn-out decent performances, Snipes is as cool as ever and Harrelson does his usual quirky, slightly goofy routine, which is all very entertaining; however they just never quite jell together. Then you add to the equation Jennifer Lopez as the women interest, in what was her first major big-screen roll. This only has two positive effects, first and obviously she does add some female charm to this 99% male cast, and secondly she makes her present acting seem to be of the same caliber as Diane Keaton!

As with a number of other mediocre cop movies, one major shortcoming is the lack of a distinct malignant unyielding adversary; someone to truly challenge our heroes while stimulating the audiences' affection for them. Here, the characters' "nemesis" are an uninspired boss/head-of-department tyrant type who only cares about protecting his "money-train"(which transports the Whole of the Undergrounds' cash); and a grossly under-used Chriss Cooper. His pyromaniac thief character seems either to have been hugely cut from the original script, or simply appended at the last minute to add some kind of dramatic tension.

An entertaining movie with a very decent script, to be watched without any too high expectations. The beginning drags-on for a while but the pace does build-up to an acceptable level after a while. Money Train could have been a lot better if it had been handled by a more competent director.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
TRAINWRECK
MadamWarden20 April 2020
Honestly the only reason to watch this is to be amazed at how little Wes and J-Lo have aged over 25 years compared to poor Woody

As for the actual movie, well, it was pretty 80's bad in 95 so it definitely has not aged well..
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Laughs a minute
stacey-dimples-198223 August 2006
I am a HUGE Wesley Snipes fan and I have to say that i thought this film was excellent. There are some really good laugh out loud moments that make it worth your while. Although it is rather slow in getting to the action its worth persevering for just for the action at the end. The camaraderie between Wesley and Woody is excellent-i can only imagine the 'tricks' they got up to onset-the pair of them together are a great comedy duo!

J Lo was a bit irritating but her personally I don't think her acting is up to much but at the end of the day the film is worth watching even if she irritates the life out of you!
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Money Train a Train Wreck
view_and_review4 September 2020
Warning: Spoilers
This is Snipes' and Harrelson's third movie together so a three rating is apropo. Don't think I'm giving it a 3/10 rating just because. No, no, no. This tripe earned its 3/10.

The movie started in fine form: funny and exciting. Snipes and Harrelson were playing off each other like it was "White Men Can't Jump 2." In this movie Snipes and Harrelson play foster brothers John and Charlie who are both decoy cops for the N.Y. Transit Authority. Essentially, their job is to catch would be thieves. One of them acts inebriated waiting for a thief to take advantage while plain clothes officers wait in the wings to catch the crooks. From the very beginning it is established that John is the responsible one while Charlie is a screw up.

The movie was humming along until in steps Grace Santiago (J. Lo). Now we have a love triangle. I hate love triangles. Both brothers had the hots for her yet she was only attracted to John. John was going to be a noble brother and step off (you know, bros before hoes) so that Charlie could have her, but she came at John so hard how could he resist? Naturally, that caused some problems.

But even more annoying than the two lovers and the third wheel was the Transit Authority chief, Patterson (Robert Blake). Wow! Was he ever the lampoon. All he was missing was a white cat to incessantly pet. They made him this megalomaniac who's sole concern was his coveted "money train." He acted with such impunity it was as though he was answerable to no one. At one point he fired Charlie in a fit of anger. I don't know much about the New York Transit Authority, but if they're anything like the NYPD then they have a powerful union that would get Charlie his job back with back pay.

But the firing was miniscule. It was something to help illustrate his power, control, and villainy. The fact is that he was depraved, and he became more and more depraved as the movie went on. He went from an unbearable jerk of a boss to an outright depraved criminal with no regard for human life. In his warped mind it was OK to endanger the lives of innocent people to stop his money train from being stolen. It's a move that even the most morally bankrupt supervisor wouldn't make based solely upon simple risk management. On the one hand you have a train with four million dollars and on the other hand you have a train full of passengers. A simple risk assessment would lead a person to value the lives of the passengers over the money because even if you don't personally value human life you should at least know that they can and will sue the pants off of you for risking their lives.

But we needed his character to be so deplorable in order for us to root for Charlie heisting the train. Hollywood can't have us ethically torn on this matter. Make the victim of the robbery a horrible person and we can all sleep at night.

It was just too farcical. Then you can add to that the fact John tells his new bae that Charlie is robbing the money train like they've been together forever. Why in the world would you share that information with her? Because you two are in love and you share everything? I can give you two good reasons not to:

1.) You just met her and you don't know what her next move will be and

2.) you took away her plausible deniability. It was a dumb move from every respect.

We still got a happy ending from this fetid goop. John saved Charlie's hide, Charlie made off with half a mil, they got to punch the lights out of Patterson, and Patterson was arrested. Not that I cared much by this time, I just wanted it all to be over.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
One Of Wesley Snipes Best Films (In My Opinion), With Great Action Scenes, An Awesome Finale And An Amazing Performance From Wesley Snipes!
callanvass12 October 2005
Warning: Spoilers
This is one of Wesley Snipes best (in my opinion), with great action scenes, an awesome finale and an amazing performance from Wesley Snipes!. All the characters are fantastic, and the story is really cool, plus Wesley Snipes is simply amazing in this!, and Woody Harrelson is fantastic!. Wesley and Woody had fantastic chemistry together, and i was really surprised, by how much i enjoyed the film!, plus Jennifer Lopez surprised me, by giving a very good performance!. Robert Blake is excellent as the dick, i hated him, and i thought, it had some great humor as well!, plus the ending is hilarious. You really get to see Snipe's incredible Martial art abilities, and the fight scenes are awesome!, plus one of my favorite scenes is when Snipes and Lopez have a boxing match, it was quite amusing!. Snipes and Lopez had great chemistry together, and it's very well made as well!, plus i thought Snipe's acting was fantastic!. This is one of Wesley Snipes best (in my opinion), with great action scenes, an awesome finale, and amazing performance from Wesley Snipes!, and i say it's a must see!. The Direction is great!. Joseph Ruben does a great job! here, with excellent camera work, awesome angles,and keeping the film at a very fast pace!. The Acting is fantastic!. Wesley Snipes is amazing as always, and is amazing here, he is extremely likable, hilarious had wonderful chemistry with Woody Harrelson, kicked that ass, had loads of charisma, seemed to be enjoying himself, never really took himself seriously, and was just amazing overall! (Snipes Rules!!!!!). Woody Harrelson is fantastic here, he is extremely hilarious had wonderful chemistry with Snipes,like Snipes seemed to be enjoying himself, had a great sense of humor, and once again him and Snipes made a terrific pair! (Woody rules). Jennifer Lopez is stunningly gorgeous!, and does very well with what she had to do, i was quite surprised, she also had great chemistry with Snipes. Robert Blake is great as the prick, i hated his guts, and cheered out loud when he got punched and arrested!. Chris Cooper is extremely creepy in his role, and was quite menacing. Bill Nun is great in his cameo (Nunn Rules!). Rest of the cast do fine. Overall a must see!. **** out of 5
20 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good Fun, but Just So-so flick.
oxblood20 January 2005
Hadn't seen this one before. Somehow it got past my radar. This is the third time Snipes and Harrelson have teamed up. The first was in "Wildcats" with Goldie Hawn back in the 80's. Later it was "White Men Can't Jump". In "Money Train", the combination of the three leads plus the sleazy performance of future prison resident, Robert Blake made this at least halfway enjoyable.

John and Charlie are brothers. Step-brothers to be exact which throws most people for a loop since one's black and the other's white. They're also subway transit cops in NYC working the decoy squad. John (Snipes) is the smooth responsible one. Charlie (Harrelson) is the screw-up with a gambling problem. Most of the movie centers around Charlie's $$$ problems. Enter Officer Grace Santiago (J-Lo). Now the close brothers drift apart over a woman. Add Blake as a sadistic transit authority manager who threatens the brothers' careers.

I'm a big fan of action/comedies like this and others like "True Lies", "Lethal Weapon" I-III and "Demolition Man". This movie is amusing and has some decent action but the plot for the most part is just so-so. The most interesting plot lines seem to just fade out in favor over weaker ones. They should have fed off the comedy elements more. They could have worked the Snipes/Lopez angle, a little more as well. I think Hollywood is still a little skittish about showing real love relationships between minorities. Still, it's worth a look.

Snipes is his usual self, flexing muscles and fighting skills. Woody is less than Woody. Funny but nothing that equals his performances in "Natural Born Killers" or "People vs Larry Flynt". J-Lo in her film debut, is sexy as ever and handles herself well. But Robert Blake is intense. A good return to the big screen in which he goes a bit overboard but remains believable. Too bad it may be a while before we see him in a good role again. Maybe in 15-20.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
No Money's Worth Here.
anaconda-4065814 January 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Money Train (1995): Dir: Joseph Ruben / Cast: Wesley Snipes, Woody Harrelson, Jennifer Lopez, Robert Blake, Chris Cooper: Title suggests theft in that the money is the riches and the train is the getaway. Unfortunately viewers missed that train and had to suffer through the entire film. Wesley Snipes and Woody Harrelson who previously starred in White Men Can't Jump are brothers and undercover cops in the subway area. Snipes looks out for adopted brother Harrelson who is constantly in trouble due to debt. Jennifer Lopez joins them thus causing romantic divisions. Trouble arises when Harrelson decides to rob the money train leading to an ending that applauds theft. Basically another buddy flick, with director Joseph Ruben handling the action effectively without a screenwriter anywhere to be evident. Snipes and Harrelson recite tired formulas where nothing is learned. Why this film could not concentrate more on their adopted relationship is beyond me. Instead it is more or less an excuse to pair the actors up again in hopes of repeating previous success. Lopez is a romantic prop with little purpose here other than to unintentionally cause a brief division between the duo cops. Robert Blake is forgettable as the foul mouth ranting supervisor. Message of theft and brotherhood sidelined for pure nonsense. Viewers should let this train wreck pass them by. Score: 3 / 10
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed