"Poirot" Murder on the Links (TV Episode 1996) Poster

(TV Series)

(1996)

User Reviews

Review this title
27 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Other than a poorly timed flashback, not much to complain about
bensonmum221 April 2008
Warning: Spoilers
While on holiday with his friend, Captain Hastings, renowned detective Hercule Poirot is pressed into service to help solve a murder. A very wealthy man's body has been discovered in a sand bunker at a golf course with a knife in his back. His wife is found bound and gagged with a story of two Chilean kidnappers that took her husband in the middle of the night. With no other witnesses, the police quite naturally believe the woman's story. But to Poirot, these events seem oddly familiar and quite suspicious. Poirot must look back into the past to stop a killer from murdering again in the future.

As with Hickory Dickory Dock (which I wrote about yesterday), Murder on the Links is a good episode, just not a great one. There are a number of changes from Agatha Christie's original work – most I didn't really care for. I suppose, however, one has to expect that certain creative licenses will be taken to adapt Christie's books to the screen. And other than one significant issue I have with an early flashback (which I will get to in a moment), most of the mystery elements from the book are here and most work satisfactorily. The acting is nice. I've run out of positives to say about David Suchet. He, quite simply, IS Poirot. Hugh Fraser gives another wonderfully understated performance as Poirot's Dr. Watson, Captain Hastings. The supporting cast is strong, but none of the actors really stand out above the others. Another big plus for Murder on the Links is the attention to detail taken in the sets and the setting. I'm no expert, but the movie looks like it's straight out of the 1930s. Sure, there are one or two discrepancies here and there, but overall, the movie looks incredible. The train station and the hotel are both amazing.

My biggest complaint with Murder on the Links comes from a flashback at the very beginning of the movie. Certain key elements of the mystery are revealed way to early in the script. You find out things within the first 5 minutes that would have been best left until near the end. Otherwise, I don't have any other significant issues with this installment of the Poirot series. A 7/10 seems about right to me.
19 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Strange anachronism
pawebster19 September 2005
This was a very entertaining adaptation with super French atmosphere, complete with antique racing bikes and many other period details. It's great to see such trouble taken. But how strange that there should be a glaring anachronism. The story starts with a voice-over newsreel in what we later find out was 1926! Sound newsreels were certainly not current at that date.

The story is complex and the plot a bit preposterous, but it's great fun. Hastings gets more to do that usual with a real romance.

More Poirots with Suchet seem to be in the pipeline, which is good news.
25 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Multilayered mystery
gridoon202425 March 2011
Warning: Spoilers
"Murder On The Links" is constructed like a Chinese Box: a mystery within a mystery within a mystery. And yet, it plays very fair with the audience: some clues are subtle, some are obvious, but in general everything you need to solve the case is right there for you; Hercule Poirot will still do it faster, though! Sure, there are some hard-to-swallow conveniences (would you discuss your criminal plans in your garden?), but these come with the (genre) territory. The production is impeccable (as usual), Captain Hastings gets one of his best parts in the entire series, and Poirot's antagonism with a similarly vain French Inspector provides some solid comic relief. If "Murder On The Links" does not quite belong in the front line of "Poirot", the second line of films from this series are still worth watching and re-watching. *** out of 4.
17 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"Another enjoyable mystery!"
jamesraeburn20034 November 2003
Hercule Poirot travels to Deauville in France to accompany his friend Captain Hastings on a golfing holiday. On the evening of their arrival, Poirot is approached by wealthy tycoon Paul Renauld who tells him that he believes his life to be in danger. The next morning Renauld is found dead in a bunker dressed in nothing but an old overcoat and stabbed in the back with a letter opener.

Another enjoyable feature-length adaptation of an Agatha Christie whodunit. The dramatisation by Anthony Horowitz is very good, the lighting first rate as is Andrew Grieve's direction and the performances from David Suchet and Hugh Fraser are up to their usual standards. Bill Moody also does fine work as the arrogant Inspector Giraud of the French police who believes that he will solve the case before Poirot does. The two detectives set a wager, if Giraud wins Poirot must shave off his precious moustache and if Poirot wins Giraud must give up his famous pipe after which he is named after as "The Pipe".
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Has its problems but a solid Poirot mystery
TheLittleSongbird20 December 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I really like the book; like a vast majority of Agatha Christie's books, the mystery is complex and involving. This adaptation has its problems, but is very solid. I do not think it is the best Poirot; After The Funeral, Five Little Pigs and Sad Cypress were better, but it is better than Cards on The Table, Murder in Mesopotamia and Murder of Roger Ackroyd. I think I will start with the pros. For one thing the whole dramatisation looks beautiful with the gorgeous French settings and the sumptuous costumes. The music is lovely as well, and the acting is stellar. David Suchet is impeccable(as always) as Poirot, and Hugh Fraser gives one of his best performances as Hastings. Out of the supporting performances, Diane Fletcher and Sophie Linfield are the most impressive, while Ben Pullen does well as Jack. The direction from Andrew Grieve was excellent, and the plot was complex enough. However this adaptation isn't the most faithful to the book, and as much as I hate comparing books to adaptations the problems are to do with that. I did get the feeling that in the first twenty minutes that I was being told too much. Another problem was with the character of Giraud. I had no problem with the acting of Bill Moody, but in the book Giraud is a tall man in his early thirties not a middle aged roly-poly "British" one. My main problem though was Bella Duveen, the actress was beautiful but perhaps too old, but the real disappointment was the complete elimination of "Cinderella" and the idea of Hasting's love interest and Jack's ex being the same person that confused me greatly when I first saw this. Plus there are plot changes that bore little resemblance to the book. All in all, lovely to watch and well acted, but the plot changes and the faults in characterisation bring it down. 8/10 Bethany Cox
15 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the best
quaxo_794 August 2001
Definitely one of the best 'Agatha Christie's Poirot'-films!

Faithfully adapted from the book, Murder on the Links is mystery of the highest level. Suchet, as the Belgian detective, and Fraser, as Poirot's good old friend, are getting better every time. The beautiful locations are perfectly chosen and the music, this time with a French touch, is as always brilliantly composed by Christopher Gunning.

Murder on the Links is highly entertaining and a must-see for Agatha Christie fans!

10/10
21 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Convoluted.
rmax30482317 March 2014
Warning: Spoilers
It's as if Dame Agatha had three or four mysteries half-plotted in her mind and raveled them up into one that was as convoluted as the meat of a walnut. The dynamics are really complicated. There are one or two false climaxes. And the villain has murdered a wealthy man, knowing that the inheritance will go to his wife, and then the villain will murder the wife, on the assumption that the inheritance will then pass to the now-deceased widow's single offspring, whom the villain will then marry, with any luck. And that's the simple part.

There are multiple references to a ten-year-old murder case in another country that have virtually nothing to do with the case at hand. So it's all pretty twisted. Either that or my brain is turning into tofu. I intend to leave it to the American Culinary Institute for analysis.

As usual, though, the locale and characters are first rate. The story was shot in the real Deauville. It was a short distance from Paris, on the Normandy coast, and was extremely chic and expensive for more than a century. The villas, the beach, the hotels are all authentic. At the line of departure in the bicycle race, you may notice some beach chairs lined up in separate stills on the inland side of the boardwalk. These bear the names of prominent visitors, including Kirk Douglas and William Wyler.

Nowadays it may be suffering the decline of Atlantic City for the same reasons. Now, it's easy to get to anywhere you like for a vacation. That doesn't make the setting less genuine and in 1936 Deauville was booming for the wealthy. But then all the period decor looks accurate, from the cars to the Briar pipes.

Speaking of pipes, the blustering local detective who claims to be the best investigator in France, including Poirot, the guy who looks and sounds like Teddy Roosevelt, is surely modeled after George Simenon's Inspector Maigret, only far more arrogant.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Masterful mystery fools one to the very last second
SimonJack20 January 2019
Captain Hastings (Hugh Fraser) is the only regular sidekick of Hercule Poirot to accompany him in this super mystery among super mysteries. David Suchet as Poirot comes up against an even more flamboyant detective, Giraud, of the French police. Also known as "The Pipe" for the Sherlock Holmes style pipe that he smokes constantly, Giraud does not have the manners and genteel methods of Poirot. Bill Moody plays the pompous French jackass perfectly.

"Murder on the Links" takes place when Hastings lures Poirot to Cherbourg, on the French side of the English Channel. He convinces him it's a bit of a Riviera coastal setting. In truth, the good captain has his eyes set on golfing. Fortunately for him, the accommodations are luxurious and the place has exemplary chefs and cuisine to satisfy our super sleuth.

The movie opens with scenes 10 years before the main story. The headlines and crime story being reported then have clues that Poirot will eventually discover to help him solve the puzzle of this fantastic who-dunnit. While audiences see the earlier story, few of us have it in our grey cells to piece this together with later clues and developments to solve the crime.

Thank goodness Hercule Poirot is here to do it for us. And to entertain with another fantastic rendition of a superb Agatha Christie mystery. "Murder on the Links" must be toward the very top of the heap for intrigue and difficulty in solving. Yet, even with that, it's all quite clear when Poirot explains it at the end. And, Captain Hastings even finds romance in this edition of the great BBC series.

When they first arrive and Poirot uncovers his ploy, Hastings tries to urge him to give golf a try. Poirot says, "To hit a little ball into the little hole in the middle of a large open field - No! It is not the taste of Poirot."
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Interesting story, just a little dull.
Sleepin_Dragon24 November 2015
Poirot is up against the obstinate Inspector Giraud to uncover the killer in a well known stabbing. Times are happier for Hastings as he meets the beautiful singer Bella Duveen.

It's not my favourite adaptation I must admit, I find it a little formulaic, somewhat bland. The most enjoyable segment, has to be the news cast concerning the case of the Beroldy's, it was very well done.

I like the clash of personalities between Poirot and Giraud, it gives an interesting dynamic for our Belgian, I like the wager they have together. Unfortunately Giraud makes me feel like I'm watching Maigret.

I find the camera work quite drab, it pans from one actor to another, it's a little flat. Apart from our main cast I also find some of the acting a little off the pace too, Bill Moody (Giraud,) Diane Fletcher (Mme Renauld) I find a wee bit wooden.

6/10 seems a fair score, watchable because it's part of the Poirot series.
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Romance at Deauville
mirkobozic11 December 2018
Warning: Spoilers
"Murder on the Links" is an another one of the Poirot mysteries with a prologue from the past, where we find the origins of the plot decades before. In this case, it's in the form of a b/w film, which I found quite charming. The story is about the murder of a man in Deauville, where the body is recovered from a golf pit. We learn of a couple on the run from a woman from his past who turns their life upside down. Poirot happens to be vacationing there with his friend Hastings, and literally stumbles into a wager with the local detective about solving the case. This time, we are treated to two rather rare occurences in the series: Poirot's sense of humor and a love interest of Hastings'. This makes "Murder on the Links" quite fun to watch. And though it's hard to find an episode in the series that would be very bad, this one certainly is up there with the more successful ones, not least due to the beautiful scenery and the charming singer Hastings is romancing.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
OK but overly complicated
It's not a bad adaptation of the story but it's much different than the novel. And they made it way too difficult to follow all the overdone twists and turns. OK, but could have been a lot better.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Poirot enters into a rivalry with an uppity police detective
blanche-29 February 2015
I guess the esteemed police officer Giraud had never read any Poirot mysteries, because he happily goes up against him in "Murder on the Links," from 1996.

Poirot and Hastings are approached by a businessman Paul Renaud, who has been receiving threats. The next morning, Madame Renaud is found bound and gagged, and her husband's dead body is found on a golf course nearby.

Poirot and Giraud disagree about the solution to this crime, so they make a wager. The one who catches the killer has to give something up. In Poirot's case, it's his mustache, and in the case of the police detective, it's his pipe.

Well, we all know Poirot isn't going to shave off his mustache. Hastings, however, loses his heart to a lovely singer. She becomes his wife, the "Bella" mentioned in subsequent episodes.

Very good episode with an interesting denouement.
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Decent, but too long
luszikelemen14 November 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I am a huge fan of Poirot and have watched every episode and read all books many times. This is the perfect episode to fall asleep to - it reveals a lot early on (in terms of main suspect backgrounds) and drags on endlessly. By the end of it, you wake up feeling rested.

The sets are quaint and Suchet's acting is on point as always, however a little too much much information is provided to the viewer at the beginning, and while the subplots are charming and add to the overall well-known dynamics between characters, I personally find Hastings' faiblesse for women overdone in this episode, and like others pointed out, the antagonistic detective is a bit too strong.

Still a decent episode, but too relaxing for its own sake.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
worst Poirot-movie i know! Full of mistakes!
wilco9620 December 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Ik know it is impossible to keep all details of a book in a movie. But this movie has changed nearly everything without any reason. Furthermore many changes have made the story illogical. A few examples: 1) in the movie "Paul Renauld" really meets Poriot before he dies (in the book Poirot only gets a letter), telling him he is afraid to be killed. This is completely stupid because if Renaulds plan would have succeeded, Poirot would have known that the dead man would not have been Renauld.(Poirot was in the morgue when Mrs Renauld identified the victim). 2) The movie has "combined" two persons into one! "Cinderella" has been removed by the movie. The girl Hastings falls in love with and the ex-girlfriend of Jack Renauld are one person in the movie! Why for god's sake? 3)Hastings finds the victims cause he is such a bad golf player. Totally unfunny and stupid. 4) The movie tells secrets much too early (for example at the very beginning). So you know things you shouldn't know. 5) The murderer gets shot at the end by a person who doesn't exists in the book. Perhaps because the person ("cinderella") who stops the murderer does not exists in the movie. 6)The book is very complex. The movie takes only about 90 minutes. Sure it is difficult to include all the necessary details but it is impossible if you include stupid things which were not in the book and have no meaning (e.g. bicycle race).
22 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
S6E03: Murder on the Links: Good, accessible mystery with enjoyable supporting material
bob the moo1 November 2014
Following the pattern of the episodes in season 6, this episode opens with a prologue which probably tells the viewer a bit too much early on; perhaps not giving too much away, but directing our attention a certain direction very early on, so it was a little distracting to be looking at every female character of a certain age with a suspicious eye, and looking at the main man (clearly to become the victim), with a too-knowing eye compared to how I normally come into these films. With this setup still in mind, we jump forward 10 years to find that Poirot and a welcomingly-returned Hastings are on holiday in France, although perhaps not the first choice of Poirot himself in terms of destination and hotel. From here the mystery unfolds with the murder, which is added to by Hastings finding romance while Poirot is challenged to a wager by someone believed to be the best detective in France (which is impossible, Poirot notes, since Poirot is here now).

Unlike the previous episode, where perhaps the mystery was an afterthought to comedy, style and other such things, here the mystery is done well. Okay perhaps we are told too much too soon, but it doesn't ruin the mystery so much as make it more accessible to the viewer (which I am totally fine with since I spent Hickory Dickory Dock believe that the mouse did it since he always happened to be on the scene of the crime – basically I need all the gentle guidance I can get!). Generally it unfolds well since the viewer is allowed to be a bit ahead of Poirot by knowing the base of the story (he has to return to London to get this information), so when he roars past us and the mystery goes beyond this, then we are not too far behind so don't feel like we are doing a standing start when things twist and the reveal begins.

There are side issues, which mostly work. I enjoyed the wager between the two detectives, even though I think Moody was a bit too heavy in his playing; I even quite liked Hastings' subplot even though it seemed telegraphed and to come from nowhere to somewhere too quickly. The look and feel of the production is very good, with good locations through Normandy giving the episode a base of France – although it did make me wonder how there was not a single French person in the entirety of France? We get Poirot speaking with an accent, but everyone from local detectives through to the guy working the train platform was speaking in English accents (sometimes very regional ones) – it was distracting and a shame not to at least have local color in the smaller characters.

The main actors do as well as usual, particularly with Suchet on form as ever. Fraser is fun but the romance pushes him a bit out of his comfort zone and I didn't think he worked as well in this. The supporting cast are solid enough to do the job, with good playing across the board – even those I thought could have done better or been cast differently, they still were okay. Overall Murder on the Links is a solidly enjoyable episode, which is accessible to the point where the viewer feels involved but not so much that it is obvious at any point. The mystery comes first, so the supporting material is allowed to be just that – and mostly it works even if the wager and the romance have their aspects that could have been better.
12 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Some changes I believe but still enjoyable
Iain-21527 May 2008
Warning: Spoilers
This is a most enjoyable 'mid period' Poirot, beautifully shot and well acted on the whole. It is quite a while since I read the book and as such I am not best placed to comment on any changes but I do remember enough about it to be fairly sure that most changes were surely quite minor - the story does not seem to suffer as a result. I agree with other reviewers who complain that the opening footage gives far too much away at too early a stage but I have noticed this with other Poirots too ('One,Two Buckle My Shoe' springs to mind). I don't know why they chose to do this.

Suchet is excellent as always and whilst I don't count myself among those fans who feel that Poirot is nothing without 'the gang' of Hastings, Japp and Lemon (actually I sometimes find their insertion into stories where they don't belong rather annoying) I have to say that this is surely one of Hugh Fraser's finest episodes. The supporting cast are very good but there are no standout performances. On the whole though, an enjoyable and highly recommended way to spend a couple of hours!
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the greatest adaptations of Agatha Christie's novels
Kingslaay30 May 2017
This was one of the most complex Poirot mysteries I have seen and thankfully it was very well dramatized so the viewer was able to follow the nature of the crimes committed. I believe Agatha was at the height of her powers when she wrote this great novel.

David Suchet is brilliant once again as Hercule Poirot. Not only are we treated to a first class deception and murder but also to an entertaining wager as Poirot deals with an arrogant detective wishing to upstage him. Captain Hastings also has his own plot and involvement in this story. Pay close attention and enjoy this great mystery, definitely recommended.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Hole in one
safenoe8 January 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Belinda Stewart-Wilson guests stars as the Dubbing Secretary in Murder on the Links, and for those who are into golf and those into Agatha Christie stories, then you'll enjoy Murder on the Links.

I only wish there were more French accents to help distinguish between the British actors and French characters as I kind of found it confusing at times, but still. Also, the interweaving cast of characters pretty much called for each character to wear name tags so I could keep up with each one.

I'm enjoying spending the new year catching up on Poirot and admiring the acting and production skills init.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Interesting, with some good twists and a nice romantic touch
grantss21 May 2016
Hercule Poirot and his good friend Captain Hastings are holidaying at a resort in Deauville, France. A wealthy local businessman, Paul Renauld, approaches Poirot and tells him he believes his life is in danger from Chileans who are trying to defraud him. That night Renauld's wife is found tied up in their home, with Mr Renauld feared abducted. The next day Renauld is found stabbed to death on the golf course of the resort. While suspicion immediately falls on the nameless, faceless Chileans, Mr Renauld's stepson also had a motive, and had threatened to kill his stepfather. However, some of the neighbours and other parties have connections with the Renauld family that make things decidedly more complex. Poirot investigates but is hamstrung by a bullying egomaniac from the French Police, Monsieur Giraud. Giraud is no fan of Poirot and believes he is a better detective than Poirot and they take a bet on who will solve the case first. Meanwhile, Hastings falls in love.

Interesting, with some good twists and a nice romantic touch. Some of the connections are obvious and some of the big reveals can be seen a distance away. However, there is still more than enough mystery and detail that you won't figure out to make this quite intriguing.

The introduction of Giraud was an interesting change, as the police are normally in awe of Poirot and try to help him in any way. Giraud being so anti-Poirot and clearly stymieing his efforts makes for an original and refreshing change of pace.

The Hastings romance was also interesting and welcome. Hasting was always the romantic fool in the Poirot movies, often putting sentimentality and his feelings for a woman ahead of rationality and the thought that they could be involved in the murder. Here the romantic side gets dialed up a notch, and it is good to see.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Well done adaptation
OrWright13 July 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Overall, I almost liked the adaptation more than the book because it removed a character I didn't care for (Cinderella) and that removed a layer of complication which wasn't crucial for an already complicated mystery.

The movie did a good job of revealing each layer of the setup accompanied by flashbacks. I agree with reviewers that the first five minutes revealed a bit much about the past parallel case. I wonder why they didn't show that during the segment where Poirot goes to London.

There were a few unnecessary changes from the book which seem inexplicable like the scuffle with the gun at the end. However, this film was a very enjoyable and mostly faithful adaptation of this mystery.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Stupid illogical convoluted solution
surangaf1 December 2015
Warning: Spoilers
As a murder mystery this is awful. It is an insult to viewer/reader. Solution as explained by Poirot does not eliminate other suspects logically. Instead he interprets all the evidence in an extremely convoluted way involving coincidences, to implicate the murderer of his choice. Other far less convoluted interpretations of same evidence would make better cases against Jack, Bella, Madame Renauld, and Stonor. If the murderer is not killed at the end, she would have been acquitted by any court that used logic. In fact no actual case can be made against murderer with evidence presented. Only valid evidence against her comes from her getting killed during final attempted murder at the last moments of episode. Even that is rather dubious since other more credible suspects kill her. Viewer is bullied in to forgetting logic and believing the solution by reenactments, and final attempted murder at the end. Of course since most of details are taken from book, adapters of this were merely trying to hide the stupidity of solution in book by such means.

Other than stupidity of solution, this episode displays the high production values and acting one comes to expect from the series.
8 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
BIG continuity error
davidfto24 May 2007
This movie contains a scene where Poirot and Capt Hastings return to the Reynaud house to confront Mme Reynaud.

For most of the scene, Poirot is resplendent in his grey suit with matching grey bow tie, but for 2 shots in the scene, his bow tie changes to a red one. How did they overlook that?

It's actually not the only occasion in which Poirot's clothes change within a scene, but as I identify the others, I may add them here too.

Another error noted is in 'Death in the Clouds' where an airport scene, full of wonderfully historic aircraft, has a very modern Cessna taxiing in the background.
10 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Entertaining if too long
The Normandy setting is lovely, the rare handsome protagonist a nice addition. The mystery gets remarkably convoluted, even by Christie's standards, featuring plots within plots and multiple weapons and lots of mistaken identities. (The resolution makes sense for about two seconds; afterwards I would be hard-pressed to explain it to someone in detail.) With the running time stretched to over 90 minutes, the director once again struggles to fill it. And so we are treated to a dozen tedious exchanges of "What do you think you're doing?!" between Poirot and his French police counterpart; long scenes from a bicycle race; and lastly a tacked-on, drawn-out ending of the Hastings In Love variety. I enjoyed watching, especially the lavish interiors. But as for the storytelling, sometimes less is more.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Murder on the links
coltras3518 February 2023
While Poirot and Hastings are holidaying in Deauville, France with his close friend, Captain Arthur Hastings, a businessman - Paul Renauld whose assets include several South American business interests and the hotel where Poirot and Hastings are staying - claims that someone, probably from South America has made threats against his life. The next day he is found stabbed to death on a nearby golf course. Poirot also makes the acquaintance of Monsieur Girand of the Surete, an arrogant police official that views himself as the better detective. This clash of egos leads to a bet between the pair over who would solve the Renauld case first.

The suspects are: Madame Eloise Renauld, the victim's wife, the victim's stepson, who disliked him, Jack's fiancée, who was frustrated by the victim's opposition to the engagement, Madame Bernadette Daubreuil, Marthe's mother and the former lover/possible partner-in-crime of the victim, Bella Duveen, Jack's former lover, who may have mistaken the victim for him and Mr. Stonor, the victim's private secretary, who is in love with Madame Renauld.

A solid adaptation of one Agatha Christie's classic mystery, and it's well-paced, captures the era really well, follows the novel fairly closely, executes his twist and turn and red herrings quite well. It's well-acted, especially by Hugh Bonnerville as Hastings.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Oh 'pipe' down !
balldave9 January 2021
It will take your best constitution to sit through the idiotic postering and bloated pronouncements of the French detective Giraud. He challenges Poirot to a contest to see who can solve the 'murder on the links' first.one of the prizes is Giraud's famous pipe that he puffs relentlessly. The character is pompous to be sure but too overplayed to be natural and continually annoying. Almost matched by the Captain Hastings bland presentation as a dolt 'extraordinaire' ! His bumbling and puppy dog, blank expressions are a distraction on the same level as Giraud. He's wasted here.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed