Flesh Freaks (Video 2000) Poster

(2000 Video)

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
seems like they blew the entire budget on tickets to Belize...
actor-308 August 2004
This is the most amateurish and boring (so-called) "horror" movie I've ever had the misfortune of seeing. I watched the first 30 minutes and could hardly stay awake (at 5 PM), then I couldn't stand any more. This is a movie that manages to make archeology in Central America look even more boring than it actually is. The (non-existent) "plot" concerns a group of archeologists in the Belize rainforest, supposedly excavating artifacts from an ancient Mayan temple. They're attacked by a "zombie" who looks like a young Canadian filmmaker with black paint on his face. That's probably because it is in fact a young Canadian filmmaker with black paint on his face... The movie is shot with horrible sound and shaky hand-held video, in a documentary style with realistic (i.e. very boring) dialogue. Most of the movie is an annoying, monotonous, droning voice-over by the one guy who managed to survive the murderous "zombie". The script is truly awful, with lines like "There was also an ancient well, its purpose long since forgotten". OK, excuse me, but isn't the purpose of a well usually the storage of water? I mean, did anyone actually think about reading this script through once it was written? It seems as if someone wrote the whole movie one night, probably after drinking several beers, and then decided with his friend to go to the travel agency the next day and buy two tickets to Belize, because he had a friend there who was an archeology student and would let them stay there for a couple of weeks.

I've honestly never seen a worse movie than this. Its only value is to show you what not to do if you're a young independent filmmaker. It was apparently made in Canada. It makes a Canadian university and the jungles of Belize look like the two most boring places on earth. All of the characters speak in monotonous droning voices and it's clear they're all consciously trying to remember their lines as they deliver them. They blew the entire budget for shooting the movie on the plane tickets which took them to the Central American jungle. (I don't know if it's Belize or not.) The most interesting shots in the movie are of an ant carrying a leaf and some birds, lizards and monkeys in the forest. There are absolutely no special effects at all, the gore is extremely fake and only seen for a few seconds in the entire movie, the constantly shaking camera is really hard on the eyes, and the makeup and costumes are non-existent. The "zombie" is a guy wearing ordinary clothes (jeans and a shirt, not even ragged!) with some black grease smeared on his face. It's quite obvious that he is a healthy young guy. Don't waste your time with this embarrassingly awful Canadian student movie. Some film students are definitely majoring in the wrong subject...
10 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Canadians should stick to werewolf films if anything
movieman_kev26 February 2005
A couple of anthropologists talk endlessly about whether one saw a zombie or a terrorist while the most fake 'zombie" ever kills people in mundane ways. LOW budget home-made zombie film that doesn't do anything right, the acting's atrocious. The plot horrid. The camera work terrible. and no suspense. All this adds up to one of the worst ways you can spend an hour and a half. I feel dumber just having watched this moronic trash. Only serious maschocists need apply. Don't say I haven't warned you.

My Grade: F

DVD Extras: Director's commentary; Outtakes; 2 short films (Flicker and Satan's Psycho Ghoul); Preview Trailer; and Trailer for "Kill them and eat them"
4 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
"I can't take this anymore." By the time this crap finishes you'll know how he feels.
poolandrews9 April 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Flesh Freaks starts as student Barry (Ronny Varno) returns to his native Canada from an archaeological dig deep within in Central American jungles of Belize. Something is wrong & his mate Stan (Etan Muskat) knows it, it was widely reported that the team of archaeologists Barry was working with were brutally murdered by terrorists according to newspaper reports but Barry has a different story to tell. Barry claims that during the dig they found a dead body in the ground which came to life & murdered everyone at the dig with himself being the only survivor, Barry claims the authorities weren't interested in his explanations & simply wrote the incident off as a terrorist attack. Meanwhile in a lab in Barry's college a Professor is examining a corpse when it suddenly come to life & kills him, then Barry's friend Lea (Erica Danya Goldblatt) is next to be killed & come back as a zombie. As more & more zombies are created Barry, Stan & their friend Jane (Eshe Mercer-James) are the only ones who realise what's happening & the fate of the entire city, possibly the world, rests in their hands!

This Canadian production was edited, co-written, produced & directed by Conall Pendergast & Flesh Freaks is one of the true classics of the new millennium, it has an international cast of five people, it has breath taking special effects, wonderful scenery beautifully captured with the latest cinematography techniques & the script is so powerful in it's depictions of it's character's inner struggles & the way they overcome the against all the odds situations they find themselves in it left me emotionally exhausted & drained... Fooled ya! Nah, sorry only joking because Flesh Freaks is one of the worst pieces of crap I've ever sat through & I've sat through my fair share of crap, believe me. Flesh Freaks has not one single redeeming feature about it, it's as simple & straight forward as that. It's one of the most boring films ever even at only 79 minutes long, the story doesn't make a blind bit of sense involving silly parasitic creature trapped in a cave for 1000's of years, the character's are awful & to top it all off it's one of the incompetent films you'll ever likely see. I hate Flesh Freaks, it's the sort of 'film' that gives decent horror a bad name, avoid at all costs! The worst thing about Flesh Freaks isn't the acting, the script, the special effects or the incompetence, no it's the fact it was made & got distributed at all because it's just wasted 80 odd minutes of my life that I could have been doing something else with, something far more fun like pulling my own fingernails out with pliers.

Frankly I wouldn't trust director Pendergast to direct traffic after seeing this abomination let alone another film in my beloved horror genre, Jesus Franco hasn't got anything on this guy! There are no scares or excitement, there's no atmosphere apart from one of extreme boredom & the tension is absolutely zero as Flesh Freaks lacks EVERYTHING that an effective low budget horror film needs to be at least partially successful. The zombies entire reign of terror seems to consist of walking down two corridors after Stan & Jane! Forget about any proper gore, the zombies look awful, there's an eye on the floor & a lot of fake looking watery blood splattered over the floor & walls but no graphic violence whatsoever.

With a budget that probably wouldn't buy a round of drinks at my local pub Flesh Freaks is an awful film to look at, the continuity is none existent, the entire thing is set in about three rooms & the Belise forest which to be fair looks quite nice but why so many pointless & boring wildlife shots? Probably to pad the thing out even though it lasts less than 80 minutes, that should tell you everything you need to know about the depth of the story here. Flesh Freaks went straight-to-video which is far too good for it, it should have went straight into the incinerator. The acting is among the worst ever & Mercer-James probably puts in one of the most awful performances ever, just look at her as she fights the zombies at the end, I've shown more concern & emotion when my friend at work Kelly has said she needs to walk over to the shop because she'd forgotten her lunch!

I'm sorry if I've sounded a little harsh but I'm sick of being fooled into watching crap like this because of a great sounding title & nice artwork on the DVD/video box. Flesh Freaks is pure total & utter crap from start to finish, it's a simple & straight forward as that! For filmgoing masochists only.
3 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Very poor zombie movie
n-hungness10 August 2007
And I thought some of my low-budget B-movies were bad...

Flesh Freaks is easily one of the worst movies I've ever seen. The plot is simple - zombies invade a university after an archaeological dig brings back some type of parasite that turns people into zombies.

The main problem I had with this film is the very poor quality. It is appears to be filmed by a regular hand-held digital camcorder you can purchase at Walmart. Seriously, much of the footage shot for this film looks like someone's vacation video, with pointless and lengthy shots of sunsets, shorelines, jungle, and insects. The cameraman also was too jerky and moved the camera too much, which constantly reminded me throughout the movie just how amateur this movie is. The sound quality is equivalent to any hand-held camcorder - crappy.

The only good point I can say about this movie is the makeup is pretty good. The makeup artist did a great job with the zombies, and the zombie masks were pretty good for the quality of the rest of the film. Also, lots of blood.

Negative points about the movie: 1. Too long. Lots of unnecessary footage of wilderness, shorelines, etc.

2. Half of the movie was shot on location at a university (Christmas break?). This film appears to have been shot by film college students on location.

3. Absolutely no skin. Zip. Nada. No nudity.

Think twice about buying this movie. Or even renting it. It probably appeals to only those involved in filming it or acting in it. Really, the whole thing looks to be someone's pet project in a film class. Avoid this movie at all costs. Before you watch this dreadfully tiring movie, watch something remotely entertaining, like Lawrence Welk or Andy Griffith.
2 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not an average clinker
goreman-55 February 2009
One of those low-budget cheapies that seem to be so popular in the States and the kind of title that you may just pass by now matter how grisly the sleeve is. However, Flesh Freaks is not an average clinker and is an entertaining exercise in well-executed splatter. For blood-hounds we have skull impalements , scalpel slashings, ripped out organs, scissor stabbings, crowbars, machetes, eyes pushed out, etc., a hefty mix I'm sure you will agree. The zombies themselves are a mixture of make-up and rather cool puppetry which is quite effectively blended but a little too hidden for my eyes by overly dark videography. However, there is a cracking shot of zombies staggering down a corridor that is very reminiscent of Fulci's The Beyond and gives new meaning to the term "lights out"! I was also impressed by the closing shots of parasites bursting from zombiefied heads which was very atmospheric. Conall Pendergast not only directs but is also credited as the writer, editor, co-spfx artist and co-producer - a definite talent to watch as they say.
36 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
No-Budget Zombie Romp
narnaz15 August 2010
Flesh Freaks, a no-budget Canadian zombie romp, manages to twist genre expectations while ladling on the requisite blood-soaked body count. While this basic concept has been done before, notably in Fred Dekker's retro shocker NIGHT OF THE CREEPS (1986), talented director Conall Pendergast and his pals provide their take with just enough zip to make for some refreshing, old-school schlock. Clever use of existing locations, including actual footage from Belize, gives the film a bit more scope than most shot-on-video outings. Moreover, the ever-moving camera-work by G. Gillard Golen, combined with an editing scheme heavy on dramatic digital zooms and Steve Kado's creepy, minimalist score, add immensely to the film's sense of dread. Minor faults do become apparent, such as inconsistent acting and stilted dialog, while an abundance of travelogue scenery conveniently pads the running time. As for the freaks themselves … well, realism apparently didn't figure into the make-up design by Pendergast and Alex Perkins! I'm guessing, however, that the inspiration for their crumbly zombies comes not from the watershed effects of DAWN OF THE DEAD (1979), but the comically stylized pull-over masks used in Mexican monster potboilers like THE BRAINIAC (1961), briefly glimpsed here in a theater scene. They're still fun creations, to be sure, and so is FLESH FREAKS, an amusing exercise in gusto and grue. Not to Mr. Kado – love the groovy theme music
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed