"The Alfred Hitchcock Hour" Ten Minutes from Now (TV Episode 1964) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
fast moving, atypical episode
HEFILM17 July 2013
Most every one of the sequences in this episode involve threat or a chase of one type of another. The main conflict between bomber and psychiatrist--played well by Lou Jacobi in a nice serious role for a change, could have been developed more to make this drama rather than just good twisty storytelling. There are probably too many characters involved to pay off emotionally.

The lead character and his frustrated artist rant and anti-society angle was certainly topical and maybe even a little ahead of its time when the show aired. By the end of the 1960s movies would be full of out right loner villains who were portrayed as heroes just because they were going against society. This character is from that mold, you do find his ways of beating the police enticing.

It is a pretty unique mad bomber story from professional short story writer Jack Ritchie whose work is sadly overlooked, probably because he wrote short fiction not novels, but he contributed frequently to Hithcock's books and magazines and had a long busy career.

One of the best scenes is between a female police woman undercover and the bomber. It's well written and acted.

There are some nice overhead angles from director Alf Kelijan. It's all really good and the twists are quite good too though a couple strain credibility they don't break it. One of these will be a shock too because all of a sudden you'll see David Caradine pop up out of nowhere.

These twists could have been cleaned up easily but, again they don't ruin it by any means and it does keep you guessing.

If it had only been a little deeper on a character level, or I supposed if this had been a half hour episode (because there you wouldn't miss the extra character depth), this would be great instead of really good. It's tracked rather than scored with existing music, more and an original score, could have helped propel some of the action.

Funny social commentary opening intro with Hitch talking about modern newspapers.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
WARNING! Do NOT Read the IMDB SYNOPSES, It Is a TOTAl Spoiler
poetcomic129 July 2020
As is OFTEN the case, IMDB, which can have you banned for reviewing with spoilers give a COMPLETE spoiler to this episode IN ITS OWN SYNOPSES. I am sure this was a worthwhile and interesting episode but casually glancing at the synopses, the marvelous surprise ending is given plain as day.
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fun Plot...Way Too Long
Hitchcoc22 May 2023
We are made throughout this episode to wonder what is in it for this guy. He's an artist with little talent and a chip on his shoulder. When a museum refuses his work and the public works commissioner is overexerting his power, he begins to pretend to carry bombs around in boxes wrapped in paper. At no time does he say he has a bomb. The stupidity police jump to that conclusion. He is really smarter than they are. After the third time chasing him and revealing nothing but paint supplies and alarm clocks, and being approached by a pretty female police officer, he makes his big move. He says he will release a button in ten minutes. What is he really up to?
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What The Heck Is He Up To
dougdoepke10 February 2016
Of course, the series trademarks are tension at most or curiosity at least, along with an ironical and usually surprise ending. In short, for the typical entry, plot is uppermost, though character can also play a big part. My point is that Spoiler Alerts mean a lot for audience enjoyment of the average 60-minute episode. So, why then does the IMDb synopsis not include a Spoiler Alert in summarizing this entry's highpoints. I'm glad I didn't read their summary before watching the entry, because curiosity kept me riveted and would have been ruined had I read the synopsis first. Shame on IMDb.

Anyway, as to the story itself, why in the heck is frustrated artist Bellington baiting the cops with phony shoebox bombs. His behavior is squirrelly enough that you never know when the bomb might be real. Then there's the verbal sparring with the head-doctor who may use educated words but still can't figure the bomb guy out. Thus, it's hard to anticipate where the story is going, which is a good sustaining hook. Besides actor Rhodes makes his loony intellectual Bellington persuasive enough so that anything seems possible. On the downside, some padding is noticeable, particularly with the extended psychiatrist interview; plus, the cat-and-mouse with sexy Neile Adams that may be welcome relief from all the guys, but is hardly necessary to plot development. All in all, the entry's distinctively different and worth tuning in. Just don't read IMDb's killjoy summary first.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"He shouldn't have used so much yellow."
classicsoncall15 December 2022
Warning: Spoilers
This had one of those situations that suggest you get more with honey than with vinegar. Did James Bellington (Donnelly Rhodes) have to be so extremely rude and uncooperative in order to pull off the art heist he was planning? The answer probably lies in the fact that he was just somewhat slightly insane, doing the same thing over and over again with the shoebox containing harmless objects each time the police closed in. In hindsight, it seems improbable that Lieutenant Wymar (Lonny Chapman) would have missed duplicates of seven paintings imitating art masters when he searched Bellington's apartment. Or did Bellington keep them in another location? That seems to be a bit of a plot hole. The quick David Carradine cameo was a neat surprise, I didn't actually recognize him until alerted by a couple other reviews here. All in all, I felt a little let down by this episode since the twist could have been more successful with a better script and a suave art thief.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Intelligent story hidden inside of a simple crime angle
Enrique-Sanchez-5621 March 2014
I am absolutely mad about this character that Donnelly is playing.

There is something so intelligent about his approach to his protest that it hearkens back to an innocent time - which could have only occurred precisely in this post-beatnik/pre-hard-rock era. A time when protest of an artistic nature was pure and trying to find itself, believing in itself wholeheartedly as a statement of artistic uniqueness. I am not sure if anyone who reads this might understand from what perspective I am writing. It is not a commonplace area of television content.

Another reviewer sensed the frustrated and wayward loner in the main protagonist. I did, too. The protagonist feels he can outwit the authorities with his clever cat-and-mouse game. He has a point to make, even as he mouths it, we know his frustration is greater than one from the average person. He feels above the fray and beyond the comprehension of those who surround him. But we who are drawn in to this characterization must prepare to be turned inside out...because...

The story has a twist...and we are the ultimate winners in this insightful and unusual episode.

Played so deftly by Donnelly Rhodes...
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Donnelly Rhodes and Lou Jacobi
kevinolzak28 April 2012
"Ten Minutes from Now" benefits from a climactic twist that makes up for its sluggish pace. Donnelly Rhodes features as starving artist James Bellington, who is suspected of sending threatening letters to the parks commissioner, and gets caught carrying a suspicious shoebox containing the sound of ticking. Revealed to be a false alarm, Bellington is interrogated by a psychiatrist (Lou Jacobi), on behalf of the harried police lieutenant (Lonny Chapman), who believes that the man is insane, and might either commit murder or suicide in the coming days. Even an undercover policewoman (Neile Adams) cannot prevent Bellington from continuing to taunt the authorities with phony bomb threats, until he finally takes refuge in a museum full of priceless art, threatening to blow up the building 'ten minutes from now.' Donnelly Rhodes became best known for his role as Dutch on SOAP, from 1978-1981, appearing in a later HITCHCOCK, "The Trap." Neile Adams had only two dozen credits, occasionally opposite her husband of 16 years, Steve McQueen. The most pleasant surprise is the unbilled appearance of a smiling David Carradine, 27 years old, and in just his second year on television (he too appeared in a later HITCHCOCK, "Thou Still Unravished Bride").
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Poetcomic1 is right...do NOT read the summary before you watch the show...it's full of spoilers!
planktonrules27 May 2021
"Ten Minutes from Now" is an episode of 'The Alfred Hitchcock Hour" that seems pretty interesting...until you stop and think about the plot. Then, you realize it all makes little sense and is way, way too long. A half hour version definitely would have worked better.

James Bellington appears to be insane. Throughout the episode, again and again, he does things that make it look like he's a mad bomber intent on blowing up an art museum. But, again and again, the packages he's holding end up being phonies. Why would he do all this? Is there another reason for his bizarre and obviously inflammatory actions?

There are many problems with this episode. The first, and biggest, is the IMDB summary that completely explains the plot...complete with the plot twist. The second problem is that the show lasts an hour and should have been only a half hour....and it's very heavily padded. The final obvious problem is that although again and again the police keep realizing that Bellington hasn't committed any crimes, he had been engaged in Aggravated Menacing or Inducing Panic and probably several other crimes...and could have been arrested and jailed. All in all, a bad episode...no other way to say it.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
He has a very complex color sense
kapelusznik1826 July 2015
Warning: Spoilers
****SPOILERS*** The city's parks commissioner gets a series of threatening letters stating that the displays at the museum aren't up to par and whoever is sending them is going to blow the palace sky high if they aren't improved. As it turns out the person sending those letters is frustrated artist and self-styled philosopher James Billington,Donnelly Rhodes,who with what seems like a shoe-box bomb later pays a visit to the place. As it turns out after Billington was arrested by the police all he had in it was an alarm clock and what looked like a half eaten tuna-fish sandwich! with the police and museum authorities thinking that this Billington is some kind of nut they have him examined by psychiatrist Dr. Glover, Lou Jocobi, to see if he's insane or not. Dr. Glover after examining him and his art work feels that the guy's not really nuts but an ego maniac playing some kid of weird cat and mouse game with the police for, in confusing them, his own sick satisfaction!

Released since he, regardless in how crazy he is, didn't break any law Billington still comes to the museum with a shoebox and makes like he's, in everyone's mind, going to blow the place up which it turns out he isn't that's giving everyone police museum authorities as well as museum visitors high blood pressure as well as nervous breakdowns. In what seems like a last desperate attempt to get attention and be taken seriously Billington goes the full nine yards in his next and final visit. that's in him making it very obvious but not quit spelling it out that this time around he really means business! With the entire museum emptied out in fear that this threat by the what has now been dubbed by the local newspapers as the "Shebox Bomber" is not a joke but the real deal!

***SPOILERS*** As were soon to see Billington wasn't as crazy as he seemed to be by having everybody think that he nuts when in fact he wasn't. And in the end got away with a major heist of the museum not only in broad daylight but with the police not being able to arrest him, like he always says he didn't break any laws, but not even having the slightest cue to the crime that he committed right under their noses! P.S "The Master" Alfred Hitchcock for anyone who's still around to watch it in his ending statement filled us all in to what really happened after this "Alfred Hitchcock Presents" episode ended. That really made about as much if not less sense then the episode itself!
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed