"Hawaii Five-O" For a Million... Why Not? (TV Episode 1971) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A "McGarrett-less" Five-O
Aldanoli8 March 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Out of the long run of "Hawaii Five-O," this episode features what is likely Jack Lord's briefest screen time as McGarrett. It's not clear if this was an idea dreamed up by screenwriter Jerome Coopersmith or -- for unexplained reasons -- Lord really had to skip most of this episode. But McGarrett is stuck on the Big Island for the trial of Johnny Oporta (the character played by Henry Darrow in "No Bottles . . . No Cans . . . No People" from just a few weeks earlier). So, instead it's Danny Williams, Chin Ho, and Kono to "hold the fort" in McGarrett's absence. Apart from a couple of shots of McGarrett in a phone booth and one brief scene in which he seeks -- and is denied -- permission from the judge to return to Honolulu for one day, Lord is missing in action for this episode, which deals with an intricate bank heist.

The bank robbery itself is worthy of something out of "Mission: Impossible," complete with a phony "attempted robbery" at the outset, a bank employee who's in on the scheme, and key contributions by two employees of a company that makes and ships "tiki gods" -- small wooden figurines depicting ancient Hawaiian deities. This setting allows for some of the show's better character-driven moments -- burly character actor Jack Kruschen plays the company's front-line manager whose expertise is largely unappreciated by the son of the former owner, who had a much more personal relationship with Kruschen's character. One telling scene has the new boss in his office practicing golf putts as Kruschen looks on in disgust -- an important moment even though it only indirectly advances the plot.

This episode also includes the last of three appearances by reliable tough-guy Sam Melville as the gang's ringleader. Melville's acting is fine, but his role as an embittered Vietnam vet, unfortunately, is less successful as a revelation of character than Kruschen's moments, coming off as clichéd and unnecessary. Particularly annoying are throwaway comments that Melville's character makes about being against "peace and poetry" and "setting things right in this country," which ring completely hollow considering that he's shown ruthlessly killing three people.

Oddly compelling, however, is an unintentional reunion -- no, make that a "pre-union" -- of future regular Al Harrington and future semi-regular Glenn Cannon. Harrington makes his last appearance in the role of a heavy, and Cannon (who gets gunned down as an unwitting accomplice shortly into this episode) would begin his 7-year run as District Attorney John Manicote later this season. The following season's opener would showcase both Cannon and Harrington, playing Five-O agent Ben Kokua for the first time (replacing "Zulu as Kono" whose departure was never satisfactorily explained). So here we have Cannon in his last pre-Manicote role, and Harrington for the last time playing opposite Zulu, whom he would replace. There's also a delightful sequence in which Che Fong shows the value of persistence as he and his technicians find an important clue by painstakingly examining each piece of movable type found on the floor in Manicote's print shop to look for fresh ink on the letters and numbers.

Perhaps most noteworthy, however, is Danny Williams' comment in the closing scene that's placed in ironic contrast with the plans of the conspirators to score $1 million apiece. Echoing Jack Kruschen's line that was lifted for the title, Danny comments that, for $182.50 a week take-home, "Why Not?" -- suggesting that a member of an elite unit like Five-O was probably paid (gross) only about $15,000 a year. Even for 1971, that seems like paltry pay for the second in command of an outfit like Five-O . . . especially in an expensive locale like Hawaii!
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
One of the better shows...
planktonrules22 March 2010
Warning: Spoilers
A few things to note: Al Harrington, who later played 'Ben' (a member of Five-O), plays a secondary thug on the show--a role he often played before switching to good-guy status in season 5. Glenn Cannon, who was the recurring D.A. 'John Manicote', oddly is playing a printer in this one. Continuity on this show was generally VERY poor--partly because the reserve of resident actors in Hawaii was very limited. However, in an odd bit of GOOD continuity, McGarrett's absence during much of the show is attributed to his being in court--testifying in the Oporta murder trial. This Oporta character was an up and coming gangster who appeared earlier in season 4.

This show seems to have an immediate edge, as for some reason heist movies/TV shows have a real attraction to most viewers (think of classic films such as "Grand Slam" and "Rififi"). This time, the show involves a rather complicated scheme to rob a local bank with HUGE reserves of cash. It's unusually detailed and interesting for a "Hawaii Five-O" episode and has nearly enough material to make a good movie. In addition, the acting is very good along with the writing.

While it was NOT a super-important part of the show, I did love the little exchange between the old criminal and his skinflint boss late in the show. While it didn't excuse the robbery, part of you could understand this guy's motivations as he'd worked a lifetime for this company, only to have the boss' son take over and not feel any sense of loyalty or thankfulness for all his hard work. It gave the show a bit of color--as did the awful coldness of the ringleader--now he was a fine piece of work!!
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Danno deserves a raise
WilliamJE11 August 2022
For a Million.... Why Not? Is a pretty good heist episode of Five-0. It is greatly helped by guest star Jack Kruschen in my humble opinion. Greed wasn't his character's main motivation. His wanting to get back at his boss was. How many of us have felt similarly to our superior at work?
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A terrific heist story
searchanddestroy-125 August 2014
For those who know my comments, they already know that I am a great heist stories lover. Armored truck heists in particular. This episode is a great one in this field. The modus operandi used by the gangsters is very similar as the ones you watched in LE PACHA, CRUEL GUN STORY, L'HOMME DE MARRAKECH, and WORLD IN MY POCKET: great armored truck heist tales. With of course, THEY CAME TO ROB LAS VEGAS, but with another way to hijack the truck loaded with the loot.

I crave for heists, that's the reason why I Watch the most of crime series, not speaking of the films, as you can guess.

Besides this, HAWAI FIVE 0 is a fabulous TV show that will remain one of best ever. When I was a kid, I only realize that I did not see so many of them. Now, I can...I have all of them. The whole batch.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
One of the More Interesting Heists
RedbirdCraig28 December 2023
Warning: Spoilers
This episode was interesting for a couple of reasons. One, the setup of the heist was more elaborate than most, with a fake bank robbery and a cast of characters with seemingly little connection involved in the scheme. Two, this is one those what I call "DH" episodes where Jack Lord doesn't take the episode off but just pre-films about 3 minutes of scenes and leaves everything to the rest of the crew, sort of like a designated hitter in baseball.

I don't know if it's because the writers didn't have to account for the Jack Lord screen time but I felt like this gave more opportunity for the plot to develop. It gave James MacArthur more screen time and more opportunity to be the one figuring out the crime instead of always being McGarrett who has to come up with the ultimate solution to the means/motive.

Sam Melville was, as usual, very good at being the heavy. One oddity was seeing Al Harrington and Glenn Cannon as bad guys when we know them mostly as being on the good side of the law, especially Cannon.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed