"Night Court" Dan's Operation: Part 2 (TV Episode 1986) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
I liked it
person848721 August 2019
If only for the heartfelt ending. Not all of the jokes aged well, but this some good character development for Dan Fielding and Harry.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Excellent tv for time frame
gladstone-7740110 August 2022
Great show for the Era, really compared to TV today with all the bs in them, it's still a fantastic show. Just wonder why in list a the cast why some are left out like Peg, the first offender in from of the judge. They deserve to b noted like everybody else.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
More contrived than humorous
cdunbar-959-32482219 February 2024
Night Court wouldn't be the same without John Laroquette as Dan Fielding; he's a fine actor, capable of a nuanced performance but equally effective in broad comedy. Fine actors aren't always enough to sustain a plot though; there has to be good balance between performers and story. For me this episode was a fail from that angle.

The clichés of Dan's established personality are exaggerated beyond the point of return. In earlier seasons, his lecherous behaviour was considerably dialled down. When it's no holds barred, the element of believability that makes the best humour great is lost.

It's ludicrous to think Dan could attempt sexual relations while hospitalized with a grave ulcer. This episode becomes fantasy because of its absurd twists. The final scene with Harry is a tender moment that redeems the story somewhat but not enough of a payoff for the contrivances that led to it.

Rating based on performances rather than storytelling which is poor.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Ridiculously stupid
nbrice1816 July 2022
Warning: Spoilers
If Dan had been in a coma he'd have been in ICU.

I don't like over the top characters and don't find them funny. The writers are making Dan dumber and dumber each season. Why would an ADA be so broke, needy and pathetic? His sexual behavior is stupid, not amusing (and I hate PC and woke BS). Comedy writers have a habit of doing this; think Major Frank Burns on MASH and Ted Baxter on MTM. After awhile it's grating and not comedy.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed