"Only Fools and Horses" A Royal Flush (TV Episode 1986) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Not liked by sullivan and Jason 🤔
christerritt-5844417 October 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Don't quite understand why this episode has a bad rap, I throughly enjoyed A royal flush, granted its not one of the best. It shows del boys resentment of Rodney for making him give up the chance to be a partner with jumbo Mills down under, let's be honest, how del acted during the dinner scene was atrocious, not like him at all, given the fact that del boy took a beating for he's little brother three seasons ago, shows a meaner side to the loveable del boy....
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Just leave things alone
maddywilliams-8174017 July 2021
I've tried looking everywhere for the original that I watched and enjoyed, like all the other episodes, tirelessly, and knowing the full script in my head. This episode has been butchered for whatever reason. One of the funniest scenes is the opera, nothing to with Del being mean, but was cut out anyway. Don't bother showing it at all. Peoe don't have to watch it. But for those of us that want the original, let us have that choice.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fun, but not the best
Blobbybrew221 August 2006
A royal flush is an episode i have always wanted to happen, the Trotters meet royalty. And Del boy is, as usual, his wheeling and dealing self, selling dodgy spoons and ruining Rodneys big chance to become a friend of rich people. There are times i feel really sorry for poor old Rodders. I what to scream at Del to leave Rodney alone and keep his nose out. Rodney meets a fellow art student and they become friends. Rodney though, does the stupidest thing and tells Del that his friends father is extremely rich. OOPS!! Big mistake Rodders, as he finds out when Del invites himself to a swanky dinner with Rodney, his friend, her father and her fathers original guests. Trigger makes a slight appearance so you know you will get a laugh out of it.
10 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
The nadir of Only Fools
studioAT9 November 2017
Widely regarded as the worst OFAH episode and disliked by the cast and writer John Sullivan, I'm afraid I have to agree.

The sign of how much it was disliked is the fact that when it re-released onto DVD it came in a much more edited form, with over 20 minutes of footage removed, and a laughter track added.

Sadly it doesn't do much to improve the fact that this is a weak episode of the show, bar a strong performance from Nicholas Lyndhurst as Rodney.

The main set pieces of the episode (the opera, the shooting, the dinner party) are all quite slow and the representation of Del isn't in keeping with how he has been portrayed previously, or throughout the rest of the show's run.

I'd love to be able to say that this is a good episode, but sadly it isn't.
24 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Just atrocious
librarian-4345216 September 2020
I love Only Fools and Horses. It is such a brilliant show. Not this episode, though. In this episode Del's character is mean-spirited and almost cruel to Rodney at times. This episode makes Del's character look so bad I frankly wish I'd never watched it. Del has always been a handful, but at his core he's a decent man who loves his brother. But that essential quality of goodness is largely missing in this episode. If they were shooting for humor, they missed the mark with this episode. I saw the unedited version, and nearly didn't make it through without turning it off. But I stuck with it, hoping for some whiz-bang ending to make up for the dismal slog that most of this episode is. It didn't arrive. In my opinion, this episode is only for Fools and Horses completists. All that being said, this is an otherwise great series. Every television series has its clunkers, and this episode was theirs.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A Plonker of an Episode
mrnickheath4 July 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I think I read somewhere that originally Fools and Horses was going to end with the Who Wants to be a Millionaire episode, but John Sullivan was convinced by the BBC to continue. On the strength of this hour long episode he needn't have bothered.

The characters are all really off, and don't match their portrayal in the previous 5 series'.

Rodney is really self confident chatting up Victoria, which is not him at all.

Trigger is brilliant trying to cover up Dels fly pitching to the police, which is way off the mark.

But worst of all is Del, who is frankly horrible in this episode. He's wound up Rodney many times, but the way he behaves in this episode is just plain cruel. And not Del at all.

One wonders whether John Sullivan did it on purpose to see if he would be asked back. The following years' episode The Frogs Legacy is pretty weak too, and they don't hit their stride again until 1988's Dates, and back to form fully on the Jolly Boys Outing.

Approach with caution.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Nothing to See Here...
Lunerar21 June 2020
I wanted to say that this was the worst ever episode of the entire show but it wasn't as bad as I remembered. Then I noticed the IMDB review from studioAT telling us that for the DVD release there were 20 minutes deleted and a laughter track added.

It must have been this DVD version I watched because it has a laugh-track and runs for under an hour whereas it's supposed to have a runtime of 75 minutes. I'm not hunting out the full version though. It is pretty bad although admittedly the shorter runtime makes it a little tighter.

Del is a real pain in the ass in this one. In the last episode he chooses his brother over a big chance of moving to Australia and becoming partner in a growing business but here he acts in complete contradiction to that and chooses the unlikely chance of making a profit and humiliates Rodney in the process.

If you have to watch it try to find the edited version. It's a lot less painful.

But painful nonetheless.
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Reviled with good reason
phantom_tollbooth20 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Not so much famous as infamous, the 1986 Christmas special A Royal Flush is renowned for being hated by most of the people involved in its production, especially writer John Sullivan. Sullivan felt, correctly, that Del comes across as too cruel and unpleasant in the episode. Although this is often put down to the fact that Sullivan wasn't present for the filming of the pivotal dinner scene, the out-of-character behaviour Del displays is clearly present in the writing, including in the bizarrely flat final scene which seems to be stretching to give him a plausible motive for his actions but fails spectacularly to be either convincing or funny.

A Royal Flush finds Rodney falling for an aristocratic woman he meets in the market, who turns out to be the daughter of the Duke of Maylebury. With the whiff of wealth in his nostrils, Del then insinuates himself into the relationship, ruining a night at the opera and a weekend in the country in the process. The humour of the episode starts out light and sweet, if a little stilted, as Rodney meets Vicky and their chemistry begins to develop. But the moment Del becomes involved the episode becomes broad and repetitive, with the same culture-clash routine being played out again and again. This is cringe comedy before that term became popular but it's a poor fit for Only Fools and Horses. The only way for this sort of plot to work is if the antics escalate and come to some sort of comedic head but A Royal Flush simply plays the same boorish behaviour over and over. It may as well be punctuated each time with the same shot of a nauseated nob losing their monocle in horrified disbelief as they declare "I say!"

Del isn't completely out of character throughout. Some of his interruptions are good-natured enough, like offering everyone ice cream at the opera, and while his heart has generally been in the right place in most cases he's always been as willing to exploit his family up to a point as he has been determined to protect them. He's also arguably done worse to Rodney in the past, such as convincing him that he was wanted for sexual assault in the retrospectively problematic episode Wanted. But that was a story about Del's tendency to take jokes too far, while A Royal Flush feels like a story about him bulldozing through his brother's life for his own selfish gratification. The justification he gives in the final scene, that he feared for Rodney's safety when Special Branch discovered his drug conviction, is feeble and so casually breezed past that it barely registers. And the ending, in which he metes out a painful physical punishment to Rodney on top of everything else, is as unpleasant and unfunny as the much criticised dinner scene before it, in which David Jason's drunk acting feels too nasty and bereft of his usual comedic nuance.

It's hardly surprising that A Royal Flush is one of the least repeated episodes of Only Fools and Horses. Its awkward production history, which included several delays due to illness and a frantic editing process that wasn't finished until the morning the episode was due to air, likely contributed to its poor quality but the script itself feels beyond saving. Sullivan took a crack at it in 2005, overseeing a re-edit that cut out 18 minutes of footage that painted Del in an even worse light, as well as adding a laugh track that had originally been omitted due to time constraints. This new version is the only one I've ever seen but if this is the improved version then only morbid curiosity could possibly drive me to seek out the original. With no series produced the following year, fans had to wait for the next Christmas special to see whether the series could bounce back from this debacle.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed