(TV Series)

(1977)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Quincy channels Adam-12
rayoflite2418 August 2015
A Dead Man's Truth starts off with police officers James Wells (Mark Lambert) and Pete O'Neil (Dabney Coleman) responding to a silent alarm at an electronics store. When they enter the dark building, the burglar suddenly emerges ignoring the warnings of Officer Wells and the young officer shoots at him from a distance killing him. Quincy is called to the scene by a nervous Monahan who wants everything handled properly since this involves a police shooting death and there is a pushy reporter on hand claiming that the police department has been engaging in cover-ups to protect their own. When Quincy conducts his analysis and autopsy, his findings contradict part of Officer Wells' story leading him to break down and admit that he planted the gun on the burglar after he couldn't find one at the scene. Other facts don't add up leading Quincy to investigate further to determine how the burglar was really killed.

One thing that really struck me in the opening scenes of this episode is how much it resembled the series Adam-12 to the point where I was wondering if they had borrowed some of the footage. You have the older, experienced cop and the younger one patrolling together at night and even riding in the same make/model patrol car they used for Adam-12 in the later seasons. I think I even remember a similar plot on an Adam-12 episode where Officer James Reed came under fire after being involved in a questionable police shooting.

Those similarities aside, I would say that this is a fair episode that does feature a murder investigation and maintains relevance to this day as the conduct of police shootings remains a very hot button topic. There are a few technical problems which make aspects of the plot improbable, but I won't go into detail on that so nothing is spoiled for anybody.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Decent but unremarkable.
planktonrules24 March 2013
"A Dead Man's Truth" begins with a couple cops entering a building that appears to have been broken into by someone. When they enter, a guy jumps out and the rookie cop shoots him. Considering it is dark and he had broken into the place, it SHOULD have been a routine investigation. However, three problems make the investigation complicated. First, the young cop panics. When he finds no gun on the dead man, he plants one on him! Second, there are powder burns on the dead guy which are not consistent with the police report. Third, there is a hotshot reporter who seems much more interested in sensationalizing everything than getting to the truth. Can Quincy sort it all out by the end of the episode?

This is only a decent episode but no more. It suffers from a few problems. Quincy seems a bit more interested in exonerating the cops than thoroughly investigating the case. And, the missing 'second bullet' is something ripped right off an earlier episode of "Dragnet" ("The Shooting Board"). And, third, Quincy declares which hand the shooter used based on their dominant hand--which is NOT always the case. While I am right-handed in almost everything I do, I shoot left-handed because my left eye is my dominant eye--as eye dominance can easily determine which hand you use to fire a hand gun. Enjoyable but flawed.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
an excellent twist
Lt-Columbo1 March 2022
This is an episode that I actually remember from when I was a little kid. It has quite a twist ending. Quincy is one of the best shows ever produced. If you're reading any reviews that are negative, there's something wrong with the reviewer.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Flow mechanics
xbatgirl-3002923 July 2022
Warning: Spoilers
So did Quincy need to repeat the phrase "flow mechanics" few few more times? He only said about 50 times in a row, so maybe someone missed it. It made me giggle thinking a technical term like that in a procedural show must have been impressive at the time.

Anyway, this episode was a little slow and doesn't play too well in 2022. Like another reviewer said, Quincy seemed way too quick to make his initial judgement, with minimal investigation, then his main focus is clearing the cop, not getting the truth. I couldn't help contrasting this with CSI, how they would investigate a police shooting, and how Grissom would behave. A completely different approach decades later.

The obvious problem is that the cop was corrupt yet Quincy and the others kept referring to him as a "good kid" who made a mistake. A woman turned in a gun to the station and the "good kid" kept it for himself, then after the shooting, he planted evidence. I don't get how that makes a good, innocent cop. He wasn't a killer, but he shouldn't have a job.

Not part of the plot but the two cop partners' voices were also super distracting. One was Dabney Coleman talking about an octave higher than he would in later roles. No idea if it happened by trying to hide his natural accent or if he later took lessons to lower it. The other cop sounded exactly like a woman at times. In fact, I was just watching a pretty poor copy of the show and when the opening teaser played, I did think one of the cops was going to be female. Nothing really wrong with that but it was just weird the 2 actors were cast together as partners. Obviously Coleman went on to do much bigger things, with a different voice. The best part of the show was getting to watch Coleman and Howard Hessman in early roles.

David Spielberg was great playing a sleazeball reporter. I recently watched the series version of Bob and Carol and Ted and Alice. He's so good as a likeable, funny schlub on that show, but here I just hated him, which I always figure is proof of good acting.

This episode really drags a lot in the middle. For much of it Quincy is just told what happened, like how the reporter was the one who discovered where one gun came from and he told Quincy about it, rather than Quincy doing the investigating himself. There's also a great deal of time spent on flow mechanics and office politics. Then the ending happened very fast. If the middle had been cut in half and the ending stretched out, it think there would have been more excitement and suspense.

So altogether a pretty uneven episode with positives and negatives. Ok to watch but I don't need to see it again.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed