Although most other reviewers on IMDb have analyzed Jawed Karim's short, nineteen-second clip that became the first video ever uploaded to YouTube in terms of acting quality, setting, etc., one really cannot do this without sounding rather ridiculous from overdoing their analysis of such a simple clip. If one looked at it reasonably for what it is, they would have to say "Me at the Zoo" probably was entirely unscripted, a short video Karim made just to get something up on YouTube and nothing more. The acting comes off as 'great' because it wasn't acting: too natural to be memorized; one can't expect this to be a Hollywood blockbuster of any sort. It is thus important only for being one of the great 'firsts' in history, and there is nothing else one can say about it without overdoing their interpretation. This is also the reason why I have not bothered to give it a rating in the first place; if any rating was necessary, it would probably have to be a 10/10, but since IMDb has a voting average of 4.6/10, one can tell most people don't even look at it for it's historical context and rate it simply like they'd rate any professional film - a sad mistake to be sure. The only real analysis to be taken out of the video is how much it varies from the videos YouTubers upload today - a drastic difference that few tend to recognize as fact.
"Me at the Zoo" consists of a man - Jawed Karim himself - standing in front of the elephants at a zoo, explaining how they have really long trunks. This is all there is to it, and due to the simplicity of the video, it comes off as more of a home movie than a YouTuber trying to become famous. In fact, to get right down to it, that was all the website was back then: not a big buck business, not a way for people to become popular, just a place where one could upload little snippets of their personal life for others to enjoy. No commercialism, no advertising, that was all. Videos still got smash hits, but this was not to cash in on the popularity of a person, just to present people with simple entertainment. That's all "Me at the Zoo" is, and if there is any entertainment value to be had out of watching this video, it is that alone.
Nowadays, at least in my mind, YouTube has declined in this sense: it is no longer about producing enjoyable, brief clips for casual viewers to enjoy, but all about the YouTubers themselves, trying to make themselves popular and sell merchandise. It has transformed from being a fun site with which to share one's enjoyable moments of life into an actual job, resulting in becoming yet another one of the entertainment industry's numerous minions. A sad thing, considering how great it used to be before all the commercialism came in and took it over in just fifteen years, and amazing how it doesn't take long for something to go too far and go in over its head. "Me at the Zoo" is a hence a reminder of YouTube's past: a man enjoying a day at the zoo, telling us about the elephants he's watching, a simple home movie. Too bad home movies don't garner any interest on YouTube anymore; shows how far away we've gotten from what used to be a great thing.
5 out of 5 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink