Diggerz: Black Lung Rises (2017) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
So bad it's great
skington-6442528 May 2021
I'm conflicted about how to rate this movie. It's quality is about a 1/10, but it's watchability is 5/10. In the first ten minutes I thought, "Oh no, this is terrible." The next half hour I hate-watched it just for the laughs. But slowly I started seeing it for what it is: a movie so bad that it's good. The acting and writing are poor, but the plot is actually pretty fun, with a Scooby-Doo vibe. I loved this movie.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
a kebab with all
ops-525359 June 2019
Have you ever seen a walking talking chunk of kebab, wearing welding glasses and a pick axe in his hand. well this walking kebab is the monster in this horror thriller mystery slasher, filmed on location in trinidad,colerado, known for its santafe railway stop, its mining history, the first female sports jounalist, being the only woman then covering the world series/baseball, and famous for its weed, that is on wholesale on main street, working as a magnet and gravitates people from the surrounding states that doesnt have as liberal cannabis policy as colerado.

its in fact a flick that has its roots in history. in 1903 there were a vast explotion in the main mine, killing 13 miners, and the monster has appeared to commemorate his working buddies, by killing 13 citizens of the trinidadian population. the cruel killings are pretty graphic and the make or break-up department have had a handfull to work with.

its nt a good film, very primitive and amateuristically made, the cast are at best b'sides them selves, and the score is made by the children of trinidad school of arts, and so are the drawings. the plot are very predictable and the story easy to follow, so if you are a walking kebab yourself its easy to follow.

there are also a mysterious figure entering the scene in front of every killing, sending a message to the victim to come, that was the lamest figure of them all. ive seen this actress before, cause its a female, but dressing her up like a bearded midget with a large spoon and a frying pan , ringing the bell like the timekeeper in a boxing match.

i did though view the entire movie, and the grumpy old man had some history learned, but as a feature film its playtime is far too long and the scare jumps are absent, but i will not unrecommend it, because it has a tiny little bit of fun in it.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Really Bad
mikedegroot13 June 2019
I'm not sure how this movie has an above average rating because it is really bad. Like some of the other reviews have already said, this isn't even worthy of "B movie" status. This is closer to a mix of a horribly made soap opera and a college student's sophomoric project that barely got a D+. No need to go into details, just as there is no need to watch this movie at all. I only rate a movie a 1/10 if it is truly broken and awful so I'll give it a 2/10, but it really doesn't deserve any more than that. Skip it.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
An insult to all B-movies, more like a Z-movie
politehere8 June 2019
I can force myself to sit through the most boring movies as long as they look professional. In this case, however, I felt like I was going to be sick, so I fast-forwarded through much of the movie. This is the first movie I've ever had to fast-forward. I'm no movie-maker, so I don't know how to explain what was wrong with this movie. You know how professional movies look different than movies that have been shot on ordinary video cameras or cell-phones? I'm not sure, but either it's because of the type of cameras used in professional movie-making or it's due to digital post-processing work done on computer after filming (perhaps both). Well, this movie looked as if it was in a raw state, shot on a family video camera or on a cell-phone with 4K quality. That means, it looked ridiculous, because the performances were theatrical, over-the-top and tried to imitate professional movies, while the video looked extremely amateurish, a bizarre combination that would make any movie utterly unwatchable. It had worse special effects than movies made in 1970s. The make-up was a joke. The female character had a kind of breathy voice quality that made me feel as if someone was scratching their fingernails on a chalkboard. Believe me when I say this is the worst movie I have ever laid my innocent eyes on, and I'm not the kind of person who would say that about just any movie. I've seen quite a few B-movies, but this was no B-movie. It was of Z grade quality. I suspect this was made as part of a student film project. Please, save yourself by pretending this movie never existed.

Final score: 0/10
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Bad, just bad!
Max_Lucas8 June 2019
If you fast forward through it, it makes it a little better.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
No No No No No
janhmyburgh8910 June 2019
This is TERRIBLE... What a waste of time. I agree this isn't even a B movie. Not worth your time.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The horror is that this was ever made
ant36au18 February 2020
I can only blame my insomnia for sitting through this absolute insult to the genre and to the audience that come across it,the makeup of the monster is abysmal looking like someone paper mache'd a balloon,stuck some goggles on it and plonked it on the actors head,the diggerz character,who is supposed to male is clearly female with a dodgy beard glued on and the overall effects throughout the entire movie are horrendous ,then we come to the relentless bad dialogue that just keeps assaulting you ears with just how bad it is,note to script writers,NOBODY on the planet talks like this!,with dialog this bad and zero acting skills it comes as no surprise that the acting is a complete travesty as well,so bad that you should just save yourself two hours of pure torture and never watch this movie.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Another rating highly skewed
I won't do much here other than to say the reviews in IMDB are accurate. This is a poorly made movie in every facet. The acting and directing are "drama club" level, the camera work looks like it was done on a high quality home camcorder, and the special fx are simply laughable. I never take IMDB avg ratings as the Bible, and this movie is a perfect example of why. I suspect that numerous folks who worked on the film, their families, and friends each voted in the 8-10 star range. Sadly, this film barely gets off the ground. I regret watching very few movies, as there is almost always something of value hidden in 90 minutes, but this is a true regret...AND it's just shy of two hours.

Do yourself a favor...pass on this one. I only watch indie horror these days, so I can appreciate minute budgets when In the hands of a capable director, cast, and script. This fails on all three. Loads of better films out there. I take my reviews very seriously - check'em out- so I hope you'll heed this warning.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Digger
garnet-9932319 February 2022
Awesome it's filmed in my State Colorado and a the town Trinidad not to far from me. It's for sure low budget the acting is bad but watchable. The Minor's costume was for sure home made great for Halloween idea the diggers beard was a stick on so take a chance and watch it 😊
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed