"Midsomer Murders" The Ghost of Causton Abbey (TV Episode 2018) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
A welcome return as a body is found in a brewery
Tweekums11 March 2019
This episode opens five hundred years in the past with the execution of a monk in Causton Abbey; as he is about to die he curses the place. Back in the present the Abbey is now home to a craft brewery. A party is taking place to celebrate the launch of a new beer, which is due to be available in supermarkets. This being Midsomer it is not surprising that the next morning a body is found... a man was boiled to death in the brewery. The first suspects are the local real ale society, whose beer festival was overshadowed by the event but more suspects emerge when it is learnt that the dead man was a writer who had helped locals ghost write autobiographies... including an old East End gangster.

We may have been kept waiting for this batch of episodes but if this one is anything to go by the wit will have been worth it. The story is classic Midsomer; ancient curses; multiple suspects/motives and plenty of familiar faces amongst the guest cast. One might think that the idea of a brewery in a five hundred year old abbey where somebody was executed is unlikely but my local pub is in part of a thirteenth century priory which was used as the condemned man's cell! The story progresses nicely with new suspects being introduced and a few nice twists along the way. This episode also introduces new pathologist Fleur Perkins; on the strength of this episode this character, played by Annette Badland, will be a welcome addition. The cast give a solid performance throughout. Overall a fine episode that fans of the series should enjoy.
20 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fresh blood for Midsomer.
dsmoscowrent17 June 2018
Warning: Spoilers
It is highly pleasant to note that some welcome changes have taken place concerning our favourite and much loved series "Midsomer Murders". It is not only the new character that has been introduced - we have finally seen new names among the script writers. This fact encourages us to believe that the traditional plot scheme will be abandoned and new impressive plot twists will be found.

The first episode of the Season 20 inspires hopes. First of all, we get acquainted with a new pathologist Fleur Perkins who really makes much of an impression. She might not be liked by fans because she contrasts sharply with any other pathologist we've seen throughout the series both in appearance and character. Hopefully she will fit in the team.

Another surprise - the victim is not killed in the opening scene! Someone gets killed though right in the beginning, but it is not the victim whose death will be investigated, which marks a certain break with a traditional scheme when the main murder took place in the first scene. There was nothing bad about it, but I sometimes feel nostalgia for earlier episodes when there was some plot development before the murder was committed and the audience got to know the victim better. In the latest seasons the first victim was always killed right in the beginning and we knew from less to nothing about her/him.

As for this paticular episode, it was not so great as expected. First of all, it should have been titled "The Curse of Causton Abbey", not the "Ghost" because we see practically nothing of the Ghost except for a couple of mentions. Second thing - as it sometimes happens in Midsomer, the murders might be very loosely connected with the major subject of the episode, like it is in this one. Neither the curse legend nor the beer are eventually of any importance for the final plot twist. It is sad that both the brewery and the story of the killed monk serve merely as a background and bear no importance. The motive for the killings was too far-fetched and not especially convincing. There is only one good thing to mention - for the first time for many years we can see something similar to a collusion and the murder acts not on his own, but this plot line does not follow to its logical end either. Repeated introductions of interracial marriages can surely be regarded as a fad. In addition to this we will witness a gay relationship between two black guys - nothing against it, but this story line does not see any logical development either and is abandoned very quickly which makes think that it was introduced as a tribute paid to modern fashion. Sometimes it becomes clear that the plot is a little bit contrived, artificial, and even preposterous. Many characters are very quickly forgotten, some story lines are loose. Hopefully next episodes will be far more better that this one. Still, it was great pleasure to watch - anyway, it is the first episode of the new jubilee Season 20!
18 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not so great as I thought
harrykivi19 June 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I was waiting so much for the 20.season. Settings, stories, murders seemed so offering and interesting. If the 19.season started off very well, with one of the best episode of John Barnaby era, than 20.series starts off not that well (though not badly at all).

This time the story is about cursed brewery. In medieval times, bad munks were killed by boiling and that what happens to Adam Osoba, a writer, who made a lot of enemies.

Starting off what's good about this episode. The production values are good and this episode is relatively well pictured by Matt Carter. Murders are brutal and interesting. Twists and turns keep coming. Episode is mostly entertaining. Some pretty awesome moments with Barnaby trying to get on with new pathologist. And of course the new pathologist! Fleur Perkins is definitely the most interesting pathologist after George Bullard.

The acting is solid too. Angela Griffin, Elaine Page and especially Micheal Byrne fare the best of the guest stars.

But if you leave these good things out, there really isn't anything great to say about the episode. I wish that more was done with setting of cursed brewery, which was quite intriguing. The title of the episode is also misleading- ghosts do not have anything to do with the story.

Some characters(Kwame Asante) are easily forgotten and not mentioned after one-two interrogations.

Identity of the killer(s) is decent, but motives feel bit far-fetched at best. Overall, there wasn't anything great from "The Ghost of Causton abbey" . But it's enjoyable at least.

Overall, final verdict is 6/10.

HK.
12 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Brewery murder
TheLittleSongbird14 April 2019
It has been stated many times regarding my love for mystery/detective dramas and shows, ever since being introduced to 'Inspector Morse' and Agatha Christie during my early secondary school years and watching the episodes and adaptations (and of course reading the books) over and over. There is a wide range of types of mystery shows/series/dramas, "intellectual", gritty, light-hearted, a mix of comedy and grit, foreign-language, not-for-the-faint-hearted, full-on-suspense you name it and there are classic examples of all.

When in its prime, 'Midsomer Murders' was one of my favourite examples of the mix of light-hearted and not always for the faint hearted. It was for a while a near-consistently very good to great show and a personal favourite, especially Seasons 1-9 before as far as the Tom Barnaby era goes. Before becoming more uneven but generally still more than watchable and at its best great. Since Tom left though, it has in my mind not been the same and there is a vast personal preference to Tom than to John. The general standard of the John Barnaby era episodes in my mind has been somewhat disappointing but watchable to above average without being classic, although a few of the show's worst ever episodes are from this era ("Night of the Stag" being a particular low-point).

Enough of that, lets talk about how the start of Season 20 "The Ghost of Causton Abbey" fares. On the most part, not too shabbily. Far from a 'Midsomer Murders' classic or one of the best episodes, but at the same time it's lightyears away from being a low-point and is a vast improvement over the disappointments that were "Death By Persuasion" and especially "Curse of the Ninth". As far as the John Barnaby episodes go, it's in the better half.

There are flaws. Some of the characters and subplots could have been much better explored or followed all the way through, suffering from being neglected prematurely (especially Kwame, an immediately forgettable character) and feeling incomplete to the point of basically nothing. That way you question their presence in the first place. Would have liked more development to Sylvia too, but Elaine Paige in a rare television appearance in recent years has such a presence as the character that it doesn't matter as much.

Also was mixed on the final solution. Liked how it was shot and staged, quite unique for 'Midsomer Murders', and the identity of the murderer was a surprise and just about buyable. Less convincing was the motive, which was far-fetched and last minute-like. Also felt that the pacing was on the rushed side in this scene, if slowed down the viewer could properly digest what was being said, my mind was in a whirlwind admittedly.

On the other hand, "The Ghost of Causton Abbey" has much to recommend, starting off very promisingly in one of the most grisly opening scenes in 'Midsomer Murders' history that really sticks in the mind for a while. The production values cannot be faulted as usual. It's beautifully and atmospherically shot with suitably picturesque scenery. The music fits perfectly, with some lush jauntiness and sometimes an ominous quality, and the haunting theme tune is one of the most memorable and instantly recognisable of the genre. The atmosphere was a mix of picturesque and unnerving, which is appropriate and suits the tone of the show very well.

For me, the writing while patchy was an improvement on the writing for most John Barnaby era episodes, with a nice mix of thought provoking and amusing like 'Midsomer Murders' at its best was. The story mostly did engage, with a diverting and suitably keeping-one-guessing mystery, with lots of twists and turns and enough suspects to not make things too obvious, making up for some subplots and characters being under-explored. The chemistry between the actors is more natural and warmer than before, while the acting is generally good. Didn't have as big a problem with John as have done in previous episodes and he works well with Winter. Michael Byrne gives the best guest supporting turn, he clearly was having fun, and Annette Badland is a surprising joy as Fleur, by far the best pathologist of the show since Bullard. Love her deadpan and lively personality and sense of humour, she is far from bland or condescending.

Concluding, pretty good episode. 7/10
11 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Worth the wait.
Sleepin_Dragon10 March 2019
It's been a long time coming, but finally Midsomer Murders returned to Sunday nights, I will of course miss Vera and Endeavour, but on this form, Midsomer will do just as well. One of the best episodes for a while, it had a terrific opening, great story, and a terrific set of characters.

It didn't rely on anything outrageous, no bonkers killings, just a great, straightforward character driven murder mystery, reminiscent of its earlier years.

I've been critical of the Morticians since George Bullard, I felt neither Kate nor Kam had much in the way of character, that all changes with Fleur, she was terrific, sassy and funny, a huge character and welcome addition. Annette Badland did a great job.

It was the mature cast that shone through, Anita Harris, Elaine Paige and Michael Byrne all terrific. Both Harris and Paige need more roles on screen.

I'm a bit miffed it's taken so long to finally see it, considering it's been seen in many countries, ITV that's not on.

Well worth the wait, this was excellent. 9/10
22 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Pathologist Autopsy Thy Self
balldave3 September 2020
An otherwise intricate story, quite engaging, spoiled by the periodic presence of the new forensic lead: Annette Badland. Obnoxious par excellence. And frankly, difficult to believe her in this role. She's a distraction not a healthy addition!
6 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Fascinating sub-mysteries throughout
vitoscotti9 April 2023
Superb writing with non-stop intriguing twists and turns. For me, not a fan of new American television and movie actors it reinforced the superior quality of British actors today. These are somewhat recent but the quality is reminiscent of the classic British mysteries. It was impossible to predict what would happen next which can diminish a story's entertainment value. I especially enjoyed the work of three sctors. Michael Byrne as broken down old gangster wannabe Keith Grundy was outstanding. Brilliant twist to have him as a big bag of wind only being a babysitter in reality. Stunning sisters Amber Aga as Emani Taylor and Anjli Mohindra as Faiza Jindal were enchanting. Glad they weren't killed off early. Poor Paddy the dog escapes pruning. I'm undecided on crusty Annette Badland as Fleur Perkins. She may grow on me.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Pathalogical Pathologist
harrierncd-113 February 2023
Claire Badland's character adds as much to Midsomer Murders as fingernails scraping across a blackboard add to education. At best she is an annoyance, at worst she can drive one to abandon the show, the series. I truly hope that Dr. Ballard, may he rest in peace, is not spinning in his grave because of the pompous distraction that DI Barnaby's new pathologist is. Surely, such a self-absorbed character cannot be retained beyond this initial entry. Unfortunately, I looked beyond this episode and am extremely sad and perplexed to see that this character survived at least for three seasons beyond this one.

Thankfully my remote allows me to fast-forward until she is out if frame. Yikes, is the creation of her character essentially a cancellation-wish by the writers, producer, etal.,?
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Great except for abrasive pathologist
Johnny_West18 March 2022
A lot of people compare the original pathologist George Bullard (played by the late Barry Jackson), to Fleur Perkins (played by Annette Badland). There is no comparison. Bullard had some attitude, but he was always professional and could provide information and estimated cause of death at the scene of the crime.

Perkins is just plain rude, and she refuses to provide most meaningful information until she is at the lab. Perkins makes like she is doing everyone a favor, or that they are bothering her. Working with anyone like that is a chore. Perkins is not a professional whose focus is on solving crime.

The story was pretty good. The supporting cast was good. Amber Aga and Anjli Mohindra were convincing in their roles. Like usual, Barnaby's wife is a big zero. Why two people that are in their fifties had a baby on a murder show is beyond me.
11 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Good One!
ummajon20037 June 2021
I really enjoyed this episode! It had my attention the entire time. There were excellent performances by Annette Badland, Michael Byrne, and Elaine Page, each with very interesting characters. The setting of the old Abbey created an intriguing atmosphere. Lovely exterior buildings and interiors as well. @omae.zing.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Sad demise
aislingdublin18 May 2021
Box ticking and lack of comedy has taken this show down a cul de sac that they will never get out of. Most diverse villages in history....more like Central London. Story dreadful and has lost its way. Middle England has never been so boring but wonderfully diverse.
14 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Glad it is back. Still needs a little improvement
centuriontatum1 June 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I waited so long for Series 20 on Netflix I finally decided to sign up with Acorn. This series is one that I like. One improvement: instead of 3 murders this particular episode only had 2. One thing that needs to be improved: some of us had concerns that there were no people of color. In the last series there were more but they were all criminals. Same for the first episode in the new Series. I hope that is not true for every episode. Also: the sargent is really not stupid but does not know a lot and is not well informed or well educated. When one of the characters quoted Hamlet :"Horatio" he told her his name is not Horatio.Hope the episodes get better because I really like this show.
7 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed