Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
The Women (I) (2008)
3/10
The Sit-Com Factor
28 September 2008
This film could have been a decent re-make, and gosh knows it tried (or Ms. English tried). Assembling talented actors together with a successful & experienced writer/director should be a formula for a decent film. But Ms. English's experience - according to her IMDb bio - is exclusively limited to television work, and it is glaringly obvious throughout this film.

I am surprised that none of the reviews I have read mention what I found most unlikeable about this film, and what kept it from reaching even a portion of its potential: it looked and felt like it was made for television. To give some credit to Ms. English, many of the jokes that simply did NOT work on a movie screen would have been terrific on TV (and maybe a laugh track would have helped). So much of the camera usage and the lighting would have played out fine on TV but looked awkward or odd on a big screen. If the whole film had been chopped up into a mini-series or a sit-com, I think it could have worked. But this is cinema and sadly Ms. English's talents didn't translate. I cringed at so many different points in my embarrassment for the actors & the writers that I felt like I came out of the theater half shriveled! Meg Ryan is her usual perky, cute self (except for the awful plastic surgery she has had on her face), but where did she have a chance to use her talent?! She has made films where she doesn't recreate her stereo-typed role and done them well... but not here. Annette Bening seemed to simply go through the motions - such a great talent and yet such a poor performance! I enjoyed the other women characters but they were more caricature than substance, and it was sad to see. What worked in this film in the 1930s doesn't translate to the 2000s, and no one helped Ms. English get the changes & updates or subtleties right. If only she (as writer, director AND producer) had reached out for some assistance, I think it could have been good. But it was not.

It's so frustrating to go to a movie that has good stars and a good writer or director and come away feeling it was a waste of everyone's time & money! This New Yorker cartoon I saw yesterday is appropriate: A few movie execs are having a meeting & the caption reads: "Let's remake a classic with worse everything!"
16 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Greenfingers (2000)
10/10
Excellent stuff worth seeing!
21 August 2001
This lovely little film isn't trying to be anything it's not. It's interesting, touching, sad at times, and very, very funny! What more could you want for entertainment? I enjoy going to a movie and feeling good - okay, so YES, this is a feel-good movie. It has a really, really excellent feel-good plot. Bad guys make good... at gardening!

It's based on a true story, and that's one thing that really makes the story work. You root for the characters (you should!), you hope for the best (what's wrong with that?!), and along the way not everything goes as it "should". Well done folks. Also very well-acted. Scenery great. Characters great. Ending great (no, it isn't over-the-top good-good, if you hate that like I do...).

Sad to have to do the cliched and tired "if you liked _____ you'll love _____", but gotta do it: If you liked "Saving Grace", this is a great movie for you! (Though a friend of mine thinks I should say "if you liked "The Full Monty"...)

I say, spend the money if you are inclined, I don't think you'll regret a minute of it!
29 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Notting Hill (1999)
8/10
Second Opinion
6 July 1999
Warning: Spoilers
I inadverdently saw the film twice, and actually liked it better the second time around! I've read a lot of the comments below (geez 183 it's up to!) and nowhere did I see my original reaction. I just didn't think it was that great, and I was especially annoyed at the ending... I wanted to yell at him up on screen "DON'T DO IT!" (sorry if that is too specific)

However, this is a second opinion, and obviously is different... First, to sell the film they obviously had to tie things up - so to speak (had to??? hmmmmm). Yet I saw more reasons for the ending the second time around. It really held up, I wasn't bored, I still laughed a lot (espec. at the flatmate and sister!) and I came out pleased.

One big beef though, both times around: are we theater-goers so unintelligent or so banal that they have to THROW the happy-ending, wrap-it-all-up, garbage in our faces??? Why did they not end at the press conference??? Why do we have to see all that extra junk at the end. I could figure that out myself, thanks.

All in all enjoyed it, and it was actually worth the money.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed