Reviews

10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
A perfect role for Jennifer Lawrence. A comedy that understands current young adult dating culture
26 October 2023
I feel the role of Maddie was perfect for Jennifer Lawrence. I have never seen her play a role more convincingly and I have to guess that that is because it was almost natural for Jennifer to play the part.

Another thing I have to appreciate about this movie is that it displays relationships and modern dating/sexual dynamics among young adults more realistically (in accordance with modern realities that is) than other comedies of a similar genre that I have seen.

There were certainly some parts that were unbelievable, as is common among comedies. (No guy's "unit" is going to fit in a Chinese finger trap for example. Also escaping a cop with a naked guy on the windshield? Yeah right. Also Percy is suddenly so comfortable and forward that he ends up, within minutes of entering the house, naked in bed with Natalie? That breaks the character of both Percy and Natalie.) But these bits usually serve to move the story in an important way, so I want to excuse them.

The last thing I will say about this movie is it will definitely offend some people, especially those who do not understand modern dating/sexual dynamics among young adults. In a way, I sort of want to recommend this movie to those people because I think it could help them understand how the "dating culture" (among young adults at least) has changed so dramatically (and especially in the last few years), but I am pretty sure they would not enjoy the movie, which, being a comedy, was sort of the most basic objective of the movie.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
More focused on Teela than past series were focused on He-man and Adam combined
25 July 2021
Warning: Spoilers
First off, the animation and most of the artwork is great. He-man himself, when featured, is done well (although I don't feel quite the same about prince Adam). The many Easter eggs were a lot of fun to spot.

That said, I have to now admit that as a huge fan of the original and 200X (Mike Young) series, I found it a little hard to watch this new series.

The general story would have been okay, but there was way too much time spent in overly-and-unrealistically-emotional conversations and not enough time spent developing story and characters independent from Teela. A lot of the conversation is inconsistent, illogical, or irrational. For example, Teela is apparently ridiculously livid about not knowing the secret of Adam being He-man, but then when Duncan mentions there is another secret she should probably know, Evil-Lyn cuts him off and Teela immediately states she doesn't want to know yet.

The tone is always and only heavy and depressing, which is certainly a departure from the original series. In earlier series the story and tone was more mysterious, fun, and fascinating. The focus in the older cartoons was often on the villains - explaining their motivations and what they were doing before they encounter the Masters. Most of the villains had streaks of logic to them or at least intentions that could be explained (think Evil Seed and Plundor for example). Yeah, I get that in this new series Evil-Lyn and Beastman ally with Teela's group, and that is fine but it could of been explained a little better or independent from the Teela narrative. Basically we always and only find things out when Teela does, and that does not give the viewer time to appreciate or understand characters that come into the story. Merman's debut for example, was a joke. Tri-klops and Trapjaw are only shown when Teela breaks into Snake Mountain. (And by the way, the whole technology as a religion does not work - especially when they say a prayer(?!?), but having a (non-religious) cult that overly-embraces technology can certainly work.) The technology cult would have been a fantastic thing to develop before and independent from Teela's break-in. Then the audience could understand it better and it could have then been woven into the story with Teela's break-in, instead of thrown on the viewer. There is almost no foreshadowing in this series and it is a shame. For a final example of poor villain development, we have Scare Glow. He is not really explained at all and we only get from the new series that he loves knowing the fear of others.. um, okay, but how did he get to be who he is and how did he end up in Subternia?

So now let's talk about Teela directly; Teela was always a reliable, friendly, social and socially-ambitious, supportive character although she could often be a smart aleck and a bit self-righteous, but in this new series she is a brooding, bitter, apathetic-toward-others, tough-girl, who seems nearly eager to abandon everyone (except apparently Andra). Fans of the original Teela are of course going to be a little bit upset. And, it is understandably hard for viewers (old fans or not) to connect and relate to the new Teela. Her new appearance I suppose supports the character change, but it was quite dramatic and again understandably upsetting to fans of the original character.

Finally, I know many cartoons work in a sort of narrative fashion now, but the charm of the episodic nature of past He-man cartoons was that good stories/episodes could stick out and bad stories/episodes could be forgotten. With this series the story is continuous and never deviates from Teela.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tenet (2020)
3/10
Ridiculously reality and physics ignorant and inconsistent while desperately trying to appear smart
26 September 2020
The movie was a bad science fiction trying to be an action movie. The concepts and physics/reality-bending rules that are established by the movie are broken all over the place. The movie makes absolutely no sense whatsoever even if you try to suspend your critical thinking. I got the strong impression that they wanted to make a movie with an original idea and they recognized that the idea of "objects" (including) people moving backwards in time would be hard for people to just accept, so instead of making it as believable as possible, by limiting the use of the concept to as little as necessary, the writers of this film did the opposite; They double-down on the false science, claiming that fiery explosions will give someone moving backwards hypothermia, and people moving backwards cannot breath normal air but can do just fine with a non-air-tight oxygen mask, for example. I can't help but think the writers and director were hoping that by making the reality-bending rules so complicated, that it would cause the audience to not question any of it. It really came off as: "this movie is too smart for you to get, so just stop trying to think about it. You are too stupid to get it." But the reality is the movie itself it just ridiculously reality and physics ignorant, desperately trying to appear smart.
8 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Platform (2019)
2/10
Displaying human nature in an absolutely unbelievably dismal way
29 August 2020
In the real world, most people are compassionate. Most people are considerate. Plenty of people are self-sacrificing. Many people live to make the lives of others better. This movie however never questions that people are uncaring towards others and are even intentionally malicious towards others by nature. The whole idea of this movie depends on an unrealistically terrible portrayal of human nature. Why would people eat in insanely messy ways if they knew others would eat the leftovers? It also suggests that even people who find themselves in fortunate circumstances might just kill themselves because they are so concerned with the mere idea of having to face future hardships. Whoever conceived this movie has a dark and dismal view of humanity. This movie could actually push the idea into the mind of the viewers that they should expect others to never have compassion. I worry it could have a bad influence on people. In the real world people generally care about each other, even strangers.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Swan (2004–2005)
10/10
A brave, inspirational, and original idea in television
4 January 2020
I don't watch much TV, and I can't tolerate watching anything more than once, except for The Swan. I would love to see a reboot of this show. It is inspirational how the women change their lives. The reveal is a little dramatic, but the transformations are remarkable and leave the women better off, so I do not understand the hate that some gave this show.

There are very few television shows that uplift, strengthen, and help the participants more than this show. It is truly inspirational to watch. Most of the women were selected specifically because they are dealing with difficulties and trauma. The ones that can use it (which is most) are all helped through counseling during their 3 month transformation, while also supported in good habit formation (regular exercise when not recovering from surgery and eating healthy). The cosmetic operations are just a part of the transformation, but yes, an important part. Apparently people (at least during the time that this came out) do not want to admit that cosmetic surgeries can bring confidence, peace-of-mind, comfort, opportunities, and an overall better quality of life to those that get them, but it is just a fact. I would think that normal, compassionate humans would understand how awesome it is that the show gives the show participants, who are specially selected as people who have struggled, particularly with appearance, an amazing opportunity that transforms them in a way that can bring them more confidence and comfort. We need to see more television like this.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Undoes some of the damage that 8 did
22 December 2019
I am not a true Star Wars fan, but I am certain some real fans will be pretty happy with this movie, and that is how it should be. 8 fowled things up for the true fans and this one (9) undoes some of that damage. The story wasn't that crazy to follow but fit together pretty well. It was fun, with many satisfying moments.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Discovering Ardi (2009 TV Movie)
9/10
Highlights the painstaking efforts legitimate experts and scientists go through to make their claims
4 November 2019
Yes, this is a documentary about a particular ancient hominid, and that alone is cool, with some pretty nice graphics and music, but what makes this particular documentary so great is that it shows and explains the tremendous effort the scientists go through to formulate their claims and hypotheses on the species and other ancient hominids. This a great documentary for people that think what is understood by the scientific community on ancient hominids is more conjecture than evidence.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Uniquely Brave Disney Movie
11 February 2019
I personally really appreciate the interesting story, tone, and mood this movie conveys. Disney took some interesting chances with this film, and financially it did not pay off, I assume because Disney's audience in the '80s could not appreciate the slightly darker tone of the film, then again, if you compare this movie with the likes of The Dark Crystal or Labyrinth, this movie is mild in its creative weirdness. The story feels like a rushed epic, but in the end, the movie remains as something that, in the world of animated films, Disney never attempted again, and it is a shame.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fantastically Educational
28 September 2012
The numerous examples provided in this documentary very effectively support the conclusions that Klein is making. This is NOT a conspiracy film by any stretch. This is just a history lesson that has you draw your own conclusions. It makes a major point that should be no surprise to any of us - that "shocks" have been opportunistic to the powers that are determined to promote their success above the general welfare. I appreciate this documentary because it focuses on important truths that too many of us refuse to accept even though the evidences are overwhelming. The documentary might be a little overwhelming for someone who is not familiar with the facts presented since they are presented in such volume so quickly. The documentary could have easily been twice as long, but I suppose that is what the book is for.
13 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Attacking the diversity that is part of what makes Obama great
27 September 2012
The facts mixed among the larger misconceptions were enough to show at least one truth: Obama is more interesting than most of our former presidents.

It seems like D'Souza grossly misunderstands what the American dream is. Obama's dream for America is most likely only a slight adaptation of the American dream. In a way, this documentary shows where Obama gets SOME of the motivation he has to attempt to keep the American dream a reality.

Probably the biggest joke of the documentary is how the information is presented in a way as if it is exposing the best held secret of the century. Take for example the discussion with Dr. Paul Kengor, which appropriately, is acted out in the form of a fake phone discussion as if the fact that Obama was mentored by Frank Marshall Davis is some sort of intensely damning secret.

D'Souza made some predictions that most any fool could make, yet he is apparently so impressed with himself he can't help but dedicate a little section of the documentary to gloat. In that segment he further predicts that Obama would look to reduce the deficit by cutting military spending and raising the taxes on the wealthiest Americans... Well, you don't say!?! The air of self-proclaiming-genius coming along with the simplest of observations is enough to make any decently educated individual sick.

It is hard to say what is most disturbing about the documentary. If you are not as susceptible, paranoid, and ill-informed as D'Souza might be and/or D'Souza hopes his audience is, then the facts presented in this documentary are definitely NOT what will disturb you. Whether it be the ridiculous dramatization of the significance of the information, the undeniable misrepresentation of realities, or D'Souza's misguided personal obsessions, there is a lot to find disturbing, but it is not the facts (if you can spot them among the misconceptions) on Obama.

I highly recommend you avoid paying any money to see it.
25 out of 73 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed