The movie was three hours long...and it seemed longer. I was looking forward to seeing an adult movie, but spend three hours watching a grey movie with ugly cinematography and didn't even notice the much talked about black and white photography, because it didn't contrast with the bland grey of the rest of the film. There was a big deal about it being filmed in IMAX, but it remind3d me of watching 8mm home movies, of a family you don't know, or really care to get to know.
The lead actor was the old man from Poltergeist, and he even wore the same hat! Most of the cast was non-descript and interchangeable,, which only made the show harder to follow because they all looked alike and the bland photography and lack of color and similar outfits didn't help. The actors didn't really seem to help, as Robert Downey Jr. And Casey Affleck (whose only connection to acting is being Ben's brother) served mostly as wallpaper... there presence wasn't really needed as the movie was intensively dialogue driven ( as in, they could have just done an audiobook and I probably wouldn't have noticed).
The movie was not as long as it was LOUD. Lots of booming noises, and yet, some of the dialogue was muffled and hard to understand. And there was a LOT of dialogue. It seemed as though this was intentional as the movie was more like a documentary than a drama where you are engaged by the actors and become involved in the story. It seemed as though the dialogue could have been more engrossing if they had just read a Statistics textbook out loud. It was very clinical, after three hours, you were told a lot about the characters, but as there was no chemistry or emotional involvement between them, you never feel it. In fact, they portrayed Oppenheimer as cold, and then tried to tell you he was a womanizer. It just didn't work...he did not come off as charismatic, yet he had numerous love interests. Physically, he looked like he hadn't quite survived a hunger strike and had the body of a 10 year old...not something anybody would be attracted to or want to look at, way too much for a whole documentary. Not that I cared to be subjected to his female love interests, as they were filmed in a way to delete any possibility of physical attraction. Christopher Nolan has received a lot of criticism for purposely not having sex scenes in his movies. It turns out he knows his weaknesses and set out to prove it with these unattractive scenes.
As far as documentaries go, I'll wait for Ken Burns to make one that is involving and interesting.
The lead actor was the old man from Poltergeist, and he even wore the same hat! Most of the cast was non-descript and interchangeable,, which only made the show harder to follow because they all looked alike and the bland photography and lack of color and similar outfits didn't help. The actors didn't really seem to help, as Robert Downey Jr. And Casey Affleck (whose only connection to acting is being Ben's brother) served mostly as wallpaper... there presence wasn't really needed as the movie was intensively dialogue driven ( as in, they could have just done an audiobook and I probably wouldn't have noticed).
The movie was not as long as it was LOUD. Lots of booming noises, and yet, some of the dialogue was muffled and hard to understand. And there was a LOT of dialogue. It seemed as though this was intentional as the movie was more like a documentary than a drama where you are engaged by the actors and become involved in the story. It seemed as though the dialogue could have been more engrossing if they had just read a Statistics textbook out loud. It was very clinical, after three hours, you were told a lot about the characters, but as there was no chemistry or emotional involvement between them, you never feel it. In fact, they portrayed Oppenheimer as cold, and then tried to tell you he was a womanizer. It just didn't work...he did not come off as charismatic, yet he had numerous love interests. Physically, he looked like he hadn't quite survived a hunger strike and had the body of a 10 year old...not something anybody would be attracted to or want to look at, way too much for a whole documentary. Not that I cared to be subjected to his female love interests, as they were filmed in a way to delete any possibility of physical attraction. Christopher Nolan has received a lot of criticism for purposely not having sex scenes in his movies. It turns out he knows his weaknesses and set out to prove it with these unattractive scenes.
As far as documentaries go, I'll wait for Ken Burns to make one that is involving and interesting.
Tell Your Friends