I thought I would enjoy this new series - it has much to offer but when an old lady who robs a store with a loaded pistol is found innocent and set free is a little too much for me. Just because you are old (how old is old) and poor (how poor is poor) gives you the right to take from someone else and be ready to harm someone???? I can understand if the writers had her stealing food instead of the cash drawer and it turned out the gun was not loaded or a toy gun, but instead the writers gave the green light to take and harm if you don't have it - they pointed out it was the government's fault - why is it the government's fault if the woman did not have money - they did not steal from her or take away her funding - she just outlived her savings - I am a senior citizen and feel sorry for people in this person's predicament, but I also have a belief you can not harm people who have because she does not - even though the store keeper had funds in his cash drawer, he still has bills to pay, taxes to pay, and now he is out. I know it is a TV show, but let us not give crazies more ideas to commit crime!!!! There can be other ways to create a comedy.
Review of Harry's Law
