I really like season 1 with the narration,the historical films or pictures and the moving art with explanations and the actresses and actors playing out events. Most of what the show was talking about was based on historical facts based on records with some interjection using logical assumption or what people believed at the time, hence the title "Lore". that's the problem with history isn't it is tho,that so much of it becomes people's opinions or what they assume was correct and not actually based on pictures, writings or filmed events. Nonetheless, i thoroughly enjoyed the first season and very much less so the second season where it became more of a mainstream horror TV show rather than something that was actually historical. then there's all these people in the reviews that are stating what the show said was wrong when no..it can't be proved wrong or right if it's peoples historical opinions. when you don't know something from history just because most people agree on the answer doesn't mean it was necessarily the actual way it happened or what the origins were etc. In some cases there wasn't a way to prove exactly the way things happened,what people said or where turns of phrase came from. You aren't right, and neither is the show. Remember it was mainstream scholars and historians that said Troy didn't exist.
Review of Lore
